Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Original Article

Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case–control study comparing 6 methods

Authors: Jae Young Hong, Seung Woo Suh, Hitesh N. Modi, Chang Yong Hur, Hae Ryong Song, Jong Hoon Park

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Several methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. In adult scoliosis patients, the measurement is difficult due to degenerative changes in the vertebral endplate as well as the coronal and sagittal deformity. We did the observational study with three examiners to determine the reliability of six methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis patients. Ninety lateral lumbar radiographs were collected for the study. The radiographs were divided into normal (Cobb < 10°), low-grade (Cobb 10°–19°), high-grade (Cobb  ≥ 20°) group to determine the reliability of Cobb L1–S1, Cobb L1–L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1–S1, posterior tangent L1–L5 and TRALL method in adult scoliosis. The 90 lateral radiographs were measured twice by each of the three examiners using the six measurement methods. The data was analyzed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. In general, for the six radiographic methods, the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all ≥0.82. A comparison of the ICCs and 95% CI for the inter- and intra-observer reliability between the groups with varying degrees of scoliosis showed that, the reliability of the lordosis measurement decreased with increasing severity of scoliosis. In Cobb L1–S1, centroid and posterior tangent L1–S1 methods, the ICCs were relatively lower in the high-grade scoliosis group (≥0.60). And, the mean absolute difference (MAD) in these methods was high in the high-grade scoliosis group (≤7.17°). However, in the Cobb L1–L5 and posterior tangent L1–L5 method, the ICCs were ≥0.86 in all groups. And, in the TRALL method, the ICCs were ≥0.76 in all groups. In addition, in the Cobb L1–L5 and posterior tangent L1–L5 method, the MAD was ≤3.63°. And, in the TRALL method, the MAD was ≤3.84° in all groups. We concluded that the Cobb L1–L5 and the posterior tangent L1–L5 methods are reliable methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis. And the TRALL method is more reliable method than other methods which include the L5–S1 joint in lordosis measurement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams MA, Hutton WC (1985) The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 67:625–629 Adams MA, Hutton WC (1985) The effect of posture on the lumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 67:625–629
2.
go back to reference Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721CrossRefPubMed Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14:717–721CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 72:328–333 Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Jt Surg [Am] 72:328–333
4.
go back to reference Chen YL (1999) Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique. Spine 24:1786–1790CrossRefPubMed Chen YL (1999) Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique. Spine 24:1786–1790CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chernukha KV, Daffner RH, Reigel DH (1998) Lumbar lordosis measurement. A new method versus Cobb technique. Spine 23:74–79 (discussion 79–80)CrossRefPubMed Chernukha KV, Daffner RH, Reigel DH (1998) Lumbar lordosis measurement. A new method versus Cobb technique. Spine 23:74–79 (discussion 79–80)CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Klein JP, Verdonck B, Nijlunsing R, Cool JC, Van Horn JR (2002) The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J 11:535–542CrossRefPubMed Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Klein JP, Verdonck B, Nijlunsing R, Cool JC, Van Horn JR (2002) The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J 11:535–542CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional course lectures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 261–275 Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instructional course lectures. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 261–275
8.
9.
go back to reference Edwards C, Hamill C, Baldus C (2007) Radiographic measurements in adult spinal deformity: what is the intra-observer reliability? In: 14th annual international meeting on advanced spinal techniques (IMAST). Paradise Island, Bahamas, 11–14 July Edwards C, Hamill C, Baldus C (2007) Radiographic measurements in adult spinal deformity: what is the intra-observer reliability? In: 14th annual international meeting on advanced spinal techniques (IMAST). Paradise Island, Bahamas, 11–14 July
10.
go back to reference Edwards C, Wooten D, Baldus C (2007) Radiographic measurements in adult spinal deformity: what is the inter-observer reliability? In: 14th annual international meeting on advanced spinal techniques (IMAST). Paradise Island, Bahamas, 11–14 July Edwards C, Wooten D, Baldus C (2007) Radiographic measurements in adult spinal deformity: what is the inter-observer reliability? In: 14th annual international meeting on advanced spinal techniques (IMAST). Paradise Island, Bahamas, 11–14 July
11.
go back to reference Fahrni WH, Trueman GE (1965) Comparative radiological study of the spines of a primitive population with North Americans and northern Europeans. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 47:552–555 Fahrni WH, Trueman GE (1965) Comparative radiological study of the spines of a primitive population with North Americans and northern Europeans. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 47:552–555
12.
go back to reference Freedman BA, Horton WC, Rhee JM, Edwards CC 2nd, Kuklo TR (2009) Reliability analysis for manual radiographic measures of rotatory subluxation or lateral listhesis in adult scoliosis. Spine 34:603–608CrossRefPubMed Freedman BA, Horton WC, Rhee JM, Edwards CC 2nd, Kuklo TR (2009) Reliability analysis for manual radiographic measures of rotatory subluxation or lateral listhesis in adult scoliosis. Spine 34:603–608CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA (2000) Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 3:281–290CrossRefPubMed Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY, Shepherd JA (2000) Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 3:281–290CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688CrossRefPubMed Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682–688CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 26:E227–E234CrossRefPubMed Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 26:E227–E234CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242CrossRefPubMed Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B (2000) Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 25:2072–2078CrossRefPubMed Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B (2000) Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 25:2072–2078CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1997) Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine 22:734–743CrossRefPubMed Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1997) Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine 22:734–743CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25:575–586CrossRefPubMed Jackson RP, Kanemura T, Kawakami N, Hales C (2000) Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain. Spine 25:575–586CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:320–327 Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Jt Surg Am 72:320–327
21.
go back to reference Murata Y, Takahashi K, Hanaoka E, Utsumi T, Yamagata M, Moriya H (2002) Changes in scoliotic curvature and lordotic angle during the early phase of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 27:2268–2273CrossRefPubMed Murata Y, Takahashi K, Hanaoka E, Utsumi T, Yamagata M, Moriya H (2002) Changes in scoliotic curvature and lordotic angle during the early phase of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine 27:2268–2273CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 21:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed Polly DW Jr, Kilkelly FX, McHale KA, Asplund LM, Mulligan M, Chang AS (1996) Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability. Spine 21:1530–1535CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27:387–392CrossRefPubMed Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine 27:387–392CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386CrossRefPubMed Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Holland B, Janik TJ (1998) Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization. J Manip Physiol Ther 21:460–467 Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Holland B, Janik TJ (1998) Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization. J Manip Physiol Ther 21:460–467
Metadata
Title
Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case–control study comparing 6 methods
Authors
Jae Young Hong
Seung Woo Suh
Hitesh N. Modi
Chang Yong Hur
Hae Ryong Song
Jong Hoon Park
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1422-x

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

European Spine Journal 9/2010 Go to the issue