Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 7/2010

01-07-2010 | Original Article

Long-term return to work after a functional restoration program for chronic low-back pain patients: a prospective study

Authors: Cécile Poulain, Solen Kernéis, Sylvie Rozenberg, Bruno Fautrel, Pierre Bourgeois, Violaine Foltz

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Low-back pain is a major health and socio economic problem. Functional restoration programs (FRP) have been developed to promote the socio-professional reintegration of patients with important work absenteeism. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effectiveness of FRP in a group of 105 chronic low-back pain patients and to determine the predictive factors of return to work. One hundred-and-five chronic LBP patients with over 1 month of work absenteeism were included in a FRP. Pain, professional status, quality of life, functional disability, psychological impact, and fear and avoidance beliefs were evaluated at baseline, after 1 year and at the end of follow-up. Main effectiveness criterion was return to work. Fifty-five percent of the patients returned to work after mean follow-up time of 3.5 years, compared with 9% of the patients at work at baseline. Quality of life, functional disability, psychological factors, and fear and avoidance beliefs were all significantly improved. Three predictive factors were found: younger age at the onset of low-back pain, practice of sports, and shorter duration of sick leave at baseline. FRP show positive results in terms of return to work for chronic LBP patients with prolonged work absenteeism. Efforts should be made to propose such programs at an earlier stage of the disease.
Literature
1.
2.
4.
go back to reference Spitzer (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec task force on spinal disorders. Spine 12:S1–S59 Spitzer (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec task force on spinal disorders. Spine 12:S1–S59
5.
go back to reference Bigos SJ et al (2009) High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults. Spine J 9(2):147–168CrossRefPubMed Bigos SJ et al (2009) High-quality controlled trials on preventing episodes of back problems: systematic literature review in working-age adults. Spine J 9(2):147–168CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Henchoz Y, Kai-Lik So A (2008) Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: a literature review. Joint Bone Spine 75(5):533–539CrossRefPubMed Henchoz Y, Kai-Lik So A (2008) Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: a literature review. Joint Bone Spine 75(5):533–539CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M (2007) Functional restoration programs for low back pain: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 50(6):419–424, 425–429 Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M (2007) Functional restoration programs for low back pain: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 50(6):419–424, 425–429
8.
go back to reference Burke SA, Harms-Constas CK, Aden PS (1994) Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program. A multi-center, prospective study with a comparison group. Spine 19(17):1880–1885 (discussion 1886)CrossRefPubMed Burke SA, Harms-Constas CK, Aden PS (1994) Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program. A multi-center, prospective study with a comparison group. Spine 19(17):1880–1885 (discussion 1886)CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chou R, Huffman LH (2007) Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 147(7):492–504PubMed Chou R, Huffman LH (2007) Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 147(7):492–504PubMed
10.
go back to reference Genet F, Poiraudeau S, Revel M (2002) Effectiveness and compliance to a center-based short rehabilitation program with a home-based program for chronic low back pain. Ann Readapt Med Phys 45(6):265–272PubMed Genet F, Poiraudeau S, Revel M (2002) Effectiveness and compliance to a center-based short rehabilitation program with a home-based program for chronic low back pain. Ann Readapt Med Phys 45(6):265–272PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bontoux L et al (2004) Prospective study of the outcome at one year of patients with chronic low back pain in a program of intensive functional restoration and ergonomic intervention factors predicting their return to work. Ann Readapt Med Phys 47(8):563–572PubMed Bontoux L et al (2004) Prospective study of the outcome at one year of patients with chronic low back pain in a program of intensive functional restoration and ergonomic intervention factors predicting their return to work. Ann Readapt Med Phys 47(8):563–572PubMed
12.
go back to reference Jousset N et al (2004) Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine 29(5):487–493 (discussion 494)CrossRefPubMed Jousset N et al (2004) Effects of functional restoration versus 3 hours per week physical therapy: a randomized controlled study. Spine 29(5):487–493 (discussion 494)CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wands K et al (1990) A questionnaire investigation of anxiety and depression in early dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(5):535–538PubMed Wands K et al (1990) A questionnaire investigation of anxiety and depression in early dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 38(5):535–538PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bjelland I et al (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52(2):69–77CrossRefPubMed Bjelland I et al (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52(2):69–77CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chaory K et al (2004) Validation of the French version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire. Spine 29(8):908–913CrossRefPubMed Chaory K et al (2004) Validation of the French version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire. Spine 29(8):908–913CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marty M et al (1998) Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(2):126–134PubMed Marty M et al (1998) Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(2):126–134PubMed
17.
go back to reference Yvanes-Thomas M et al (2002) Validity of the French-language version of the Quebec back pain disability scale in low back pain patients in France. Joint Bone Spine 69(4):397–405CrossRefPubMed Yvanes-Thomas M et al (2002) Validity of the French-language version of the Quebec back pain disability scale in low back pain patients in France. Joint Bone Spine 69(4):397–405CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Merritt JL et al (1986) Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods. Mayo Clin Proc 61(3):192–197PubMed Merritt JL et al (1986) Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods. Mayo Clin Proc 61(3):192–197PubMed
19.
go back to reference Biering-Sorensen F (1984) Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(2):106–119 Biering-Sorensen F (1984) Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9(2):106–119
20.
go back to reference Shirado O et al (1995) Concentric and eccentric strength of trunk muscles: influence of test postures on strength and characteristics of patients with chronic low-back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76(7):604–611CrossRefPubMed Shirado O et al (1995) Concentric and eccentric strength of trunk muscles: influence of test postures on strength and characteristics of patients with chronic low-back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76(7):604–611CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
go back to reference Verfaille S et al (2005) Evaluation after four years of exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Readapt Med Phys 48(2):53–60PubMed Verfaille S et al (2005) Evaluation after four years of exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Readapt Med Phys 48(2):53–60PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bendix AE et al (1998) A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 7(2):111–119CrossRefPubMed Bendix AE et al (1998) A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 7(2):111–119CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hazard RG et al (1989) Functional restoration with behavioral support. A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 14(2):157–161CrossRefPubMed Hazard RG et al (1989) Functional restoration with behavioral support. A one-year prospective study of patients with chronic low-back pain. Spine 14(2):157–161CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Alaranta H et al (1994) Intensive physical and psychosocial training program for patients with chronic low back pain. A controlled clinical trial. Spine 19(12):1339–1349CrossRefPubMed Alaranta H et al (1994) Intensive physical and psychosocial training program for patients with chronic low back pain. A controlled clinical trial. Spine 19(12):1339–1349CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hlobil H et al (2005) The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupational health on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12-month results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):569–580CrossRefPubMed Hlobil H et al (2005) The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupational health on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12-month results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 15(4):569–580CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(4):473–477 Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O (1995) Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(4):473–477
28.
go back to reference Indahl A et al (1998) Five-year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(23):2625–2630 Indahl A et al (1998) Five-year follow-up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(23):2625–2630
29.
go back to reference Lindstrom I et al (1992) The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 72(4):279–290 (discussion 291–293)PubMed Lindstrom I et al (1992) The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. Phys Ther 72(4):279–290 (discussion 291–293)PubMed
30.
go back to reference Loisel P (1997) A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(24):2911–2918 Loisel P (1997) A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(24):2911–2918
31.
go back to reference Andersson GB, Svensson HO, Oden A (1983) The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 8(8):880–884CrossRefPubMed Andersson GB, Svensson HO, Oden A (1983) The intensity of work recovery in low back pain. Spine 8(8):880–884CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Taimela S et al (2000) The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain: a follow-up study. Spine 25(14):1809–1816CrossRefPubMed Taimela S et al (2000) The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain: a follow-up study. Spine 25(14):1809–1816CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term return to work after a functional restoration program for chronic low-back pain patients: a prospective study
Authors
Cécile Poulain
Solen Kernéis
Sylvie Rozenberg
Bruno Fautrel
Pierre Bourgeois
Violaine Foltz
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1361-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

European Spine Journal 7/2010 Go to the issue