Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2008

Open Access 01-02-2008 | Original Article

High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis

Authors: Olaf J. Verhoof, Johannes L. Bron, Frits H. Wapstra, Barend J. van Royen

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The X-Stop interspinous distraction device has shown to be an attractive alternative to conventional surgical procedures in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. However, the effectiveness of the X-Stop in symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis is not known. A cohort of 12 consecutive patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated with the X-Stop interspinous distraction device. All patients had low back pain, neurogenic claudication and radiculopathy. Pre-operative radiographs revealed an average slip of 19.6%. MRI of the lumbosacral spine showed a severe stenosis. In ten patients, the X-Stop was placed at the L4–5 level, whereas two patients were treated at both, L3–4 and L4–5 level. The mean follow-up was 30.3 months. In eight patients a complete relief of symptoms was observed post-operatively, whereas the remaining 4 patients experienced no relief of symptoms. Recurrence of pain, neurogenic claudication, and worsening of neurological symptoms was observed in three patients within 24 months. Post-operative radiographs and MRI did not show any changes in the percentage of slip or spinal dimensions. Finally, secondary surgical treatment by decompression with posterolateral fusion was performed in seven patients (58%) within 24 months. In conclusion, the X-Stop interspinous distraction device showed an extremely high failure rate, defined as surgical re-intervention, after short term follow-up in patients with spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. We do not recommend the X-Stop for the treatment of spinal stenosis complicating degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anderson PA, Tribus CB, Kitchel SH (2006) Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 4:463–471PubMedCrossRef Anderson PA, Tribus CB, Kitchel SH (2006) Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 4:463–471PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Atlas SJ, Delitto A (2006) Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:198–207PubMedCrossRef Atlas SJ, Delitto A (2006) Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:198–207PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bassewitz H, Herkowitz H (2001) Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: current concepts of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:54–60PubMedCrossRef Bassewitz H, Herkowitz H (2001) Lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis: current concepts of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:54–60PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG (2005) Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine 30:S73–S78PubMedCrossRef Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG (2005) Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine 30:S73–S78PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cinotti G, Postacchini F, Fassari F, Urso S (1997) Predisposing factors in degenerative spondylolisthesis. A radiographic and CT study. Int Orthop 21:337–342PubMedCrossRef Cinotti G, Postacchini F, Fassari F, Urso S (1997) Predisposing factors in degenerative spondylolisthesis. A radiographic and CT study. Int Orthop 21:337–342PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dong G, Porter RW (1989) Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine 14:965–969PubMedCrossRef Dong G, Porter RW (1989) Walking and cycling tests in neurogenic and intermittent claudication. Spine 14:965–969PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grobler LJ, Robertson PA, Novotny JE, Pope MH (1993) Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology. Spine 18:80–91PubMedCrossRef Grobler LJ, Robertson PA, Novotny JE, Pope MH (1993) Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology. Spine 18:80–91PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF (2006) Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:323–327PubMedCrossRef Kondrashov DG, Hannibal M, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF (2006) Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 4-year follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:323–327PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS, Yerby SA (2005) The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 30:744–749PubMedCrossRef Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS, Yerby SA (2005) The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine 30:744–749PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN (2003) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 34:281–295PubMedCrossRef Sengupta DK, Herkowitz HN (2003) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 34:281–295PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Karadimas E, Smith F, Wardlaw D (2005) The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device. Spine 30:2677–2682PubMedCrossRef Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Karadimas E, Smith F, Wardlaw D (2005) The positional magnetic resonance imaging changes in the lumbar spine following insertion of a novel interspinous process distraction device. Spine 30:2677–2682PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vibert BT, Sliva CD, Herkowitz HN (2006) Treatment of instability and spondylolisthesis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:222–227PubMedCrossRef Vibert BT, Sliva CD, Herkowitz HN (2006) Treatment of instability and spondylolisthesis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:222–227PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ et al (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13:22–31PubMedCrossRef Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ et al (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13:22–31PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ et al (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 30:1351–1358PubMedCrossRef Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ et al (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine 30:1351–1358PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis
Authors
Olaf J. Verhoof
Johannes L. Bron
Frits H. Wapstra
Barend J. van Royen
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0492-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

European Spine Journal 2/2008 Go to the issue