Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 3/2005

01-04-2005 | Original Article

Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading

Authors: Deed E. Harrison, Christopher J. Colloca, Donald D. Harrison, Tadeusz J. Janik, Jason W. Haas, Tony S. Keller

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

In the absence of external forces, the largest contributor to intervertebral disc (IVD) loads and stresses is trunk muscular activity. The relationship between trunk posture, spine geometry, extensor muscle activity, and the loads and stresses acting on the IVD is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in thoracolumbar disc loads and extensor muscle forces following anterior translation of the thoracic spine in the upright posture. Vertebral body geometries (C2 to S1) and the location of the femoral head and acetabulum centroids were obtained by digitizing lateral, full-spine radiographs of 13 men and five women volunteers without previous history of back pain. Two standing, lateral, full-spine radiographic views were obtained for each subject: a neutral-posture lateral radiograph and a radiograph during anterior translation of the thorax relative to the pelvis (while keeping T1 aligned over T12). Extensor muscle loads, and compression and shear stresses acting on the IVDs, were calculated for each posture using a previously validated biomechanical model. Comparing vertebral centroids for the neutral posture to the anterior posture, subjects were able to anterior translate +101.5 mm±33.0 mm (C7–hip axis), +81.5 mm±39.2 mm (C7–S1) (vertebral centroid of C7 compared with a vertical line through the vertebral centroid of S1), and +58.9 mm±19.1 mm (T12–S1). In the anterior translated posture, disc loads and stresses were significantly increased for all levels below T9. Increases in IVD compressive loads and shear loads, and the corresponding stresses, were most marked at the L5–S1 level and L3–L4 level, respectively. The extensor muscle loads required to maintain static equilibrium in the upright posture increased from 147.2 N (mean, neutral posture) to 667.1 N (mean, translated posture) at L5–S1. Compressive loads on the anterior and posterior L5–S1 disc nearly doubled in the anterior translated posture. Anterior translation of the thorax resulted in significantly increased loads and stresses acting on the thoracolumbar spine. This posture is common in lumbar spinal disorders and could contribute to lumbar disc pathologies, progression of L5–S1 spondylolisthesis deformities, and poor outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. In conclusion, anterior trunk translation in the standing subject increases extensor muscle activity and loads and stresses acting on the intervertebral disc in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP, Dolan P (1996) Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 21:434–438CrossRefPubMed Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP, Dolan P (1996) Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 21:434–438CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bogduk N, Macintosh JE, Pearcy MJ (1992) A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 17:897–913PubMed Bogduk N, Macintosh JE, Pearcy MJ (1992) A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 17:897–913PubMed
3.
go back to reference Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM (1999) Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24:1712–1720CrossRefPubMed Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus CR, Blanke KM (1999) Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 24:1712–1720CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Burdorf A, van Riel M, Snijders C (1992) Trunk Muscle strength measurements and prediction of low back pain among workers. Clin Biomech 7:422–429CrossRef Burdorf A, van Riel M, Snijders C (1992) Trunk Muscle strength measurements and prediction of low back pain among workers. Clin Biomech 7:422–429CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, Yamashita T, Avramov A, Getchell TV, King AI (1997) Mechanisms of low back pain: a neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic study. Clin Orthop 166–180 Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, Yamashita T, Avramov A, Getchell TV, King AI (1997) Mechanisms of low back pain: a neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic study. Clin Orthop 166–180
6.
go back to reference Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A (1997) Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture. Spine 22:2207–2212CrossRefPubMed Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A (1997) Stabilizing function of trunk flexor-extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture. Spine 22:2207–2212CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Peterson TK, Seltzer DE (2003) Comparison of dynamic posteroanterior spinal stiffness to plain film radiographic images of lumbar disk height. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26:233–241CrossRefPubMed Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Peterson TK, Seltzer DE (2003) Comparison of dynamic posteroanterior spinal stiffness to plain film radiographic images of lumbar disk height. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26:233–241CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dolan P, Adams MA (2001) Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) [Suppl 1] 16:S8–S16 Dolan P, Adams MA (2001) Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) [Suppl 1] 16:S8–S16
9.
go back to reference Guzik DC, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Park JH, Spengler DM (1996) A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine during upright isometric flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Spine 21:427–433CrossRefPubMed Guzik DC, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Park JH, Spengler DM (1996) A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine during upright isometric flexion, extension, and lateral bending. Spine 21:427–433CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Holland B (1998) Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. J Spinal Disord 11:430–439PubMed Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Holland B (1998) Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. J Spinal Disord 11:430–439PubMed
11.
go back to reference Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: Centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242CrossRefPubMed Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: Centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Harmon SF (2002) Can the thoracic kyphosis be modeled with a simple geometric shape?: the results of circular and elliptical modeling in 80 asymptomatic patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:213–220PubMed Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Harmon SF (2002) Can the thoracic kyphosis be modeled with a simple geometric shape?: the results of circular and elliptical modeling in 80 asymptomatic patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:213–220PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1997) Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine 22:734–743CrossRefPubMed Hedman TP, Fernie GR (1997) Mechanical response of the lumbar spine to seated postural loads. Spine 22:734–743CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Huang QM, Andersson E, Thorstensson A (2001) Intramuscular myoelectric activity and selective coactivation of trunk muscles during lateral flexion with and without load. Spine 26:1465–1472CrossRefPubMed Huang QM, Andersson E, Thorstensson A (2001) Intramuscular myoelectric activity and selective coactivation of trunk muscles during lateral flexion with and without load. Spine 26:1465–1472CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Boden SD, Hyon S, Toribatake Y, Tomita K, Hair GA (1999) The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine 24:1507–1515PubMed Hutton WC, Elmer WA, Boden SD, Hyon S, Toribatake Y, Tomita K, Hair GA (1999) The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism. Spine 24:1507–1515PubMed
16.
go back to reference Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19:1611–1618PubMed Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19:1611–1618PubMed
17.
go back to reference Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE (1998) Can the sagittal lumbar curvature be closely approximated by an ellipse? J Orthop Res 16:766–770PubMed Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE (1998) Can the sagittal lumbar curvature be closely approximated by an ellipse? J Orthop Res 16:766–770PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M (2002) Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:59–64CrossRefPubMed Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Hashizume H, Yoshida M (2002) Lumbar sagittal balance influences the clinical outcome after decompression and posterolateral spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:59–64CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Keller TS, Nathan M (1999) Height change caused by creep in intervertebral discs: a sagittal plane model. J Spinal Disord 12:313–324PubMed Keller TS, Nathan M (1999) Height change caused by creep in intervertebral discs: a sagittal plane model. J Spinal Disord 12:313–324PubMed
20.
go back to reference Keller TS, Roy AL (2002) Posture-dependent isometric trunk extension and flexion strength in normal male and female subjects. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:312–318PubMed Keller TS, Roy AL (2002) Posture-dependent isometric trunk extension and flexion strength in normal male and female subjects. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:312–318PubMed
21.
go back to reference Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462CrossRefPubMed Keller TS, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2003) Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity. Spine 28:455–462CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Haid C, Claes L (2000) Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:543–550CrossRefPubMed Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Haid C, Claes L (2000) Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:543–550CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kiefer A, Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (1997) Stability of the human spine in neutral postures. Eur Spine J 6:45–53PubMed Kiefer A, Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (1997) Stability of the human spine in neutral postures. Eur Spine J 6:45–53PubMed
24.
go back to reference Kiefer A, Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (1998) Synergy of the human spine in neutral postures. Eur Spine J 7:471–479PubMed Kiefer A, Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (1998) Synergy of the human spine in neutral postures. Eur Spine J 7:471–479PubMed
25.
go back to reference Krismer M, Haid C, Rabl W (1996) The contribution of anulus fibers to torque resistance. Spine 21:2551–2557CrossRefPubMed Krismer M, Haid C, Rabl W (1996) The contribution of anulus fibers to torque resistance. Spine 21:2551–2557CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319CrossRefPubMed Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ (1991) The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22:181–187 Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ (1991) The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am 22:181–187
28.
go back to reference Loder RT (2001) Profiles of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine in children and adolescents with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14:465–471CrossRefPubMed Loder RT (2001) Profiles of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine in children and adolescents with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14:465–471CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mueller G, Morlock MM, Vollmer M, Honl M, Hille E, Schneider E (1998) Intramuscular pressure in the erector spinae and intra-abdominal pressure related to posture and load. Spine 23:2580–2590CrossRefPubMed Mueller G, Morlock MM, Vollmer M, Honl M, Hille E, Schneider E (1998) Intramuscular pressure in the erector spinae and intra-abdominal pressure related to posture and load. Spine 23:2580–2590CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Nachemson AL (1963) The influence of spinal movements on the lumbar intradiscal pressure and on the tensile stresses in the annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 33:183–207 Nachemson AL (1963) The influence of spinal movements on the lumbar intradiscal pressure and on the tensile stresses in the annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 33:183–207
31.
go back to reference Nagurka ML, Hayes WC (1980) An interactive graphics package for calculating cross-sectional properties of complex shapes. J Biomech 13:59–64CrossRefPubMed Nagurka ML, Hayes WC (1980) An interactive graphics package for calculating cross-sectional properties of complex shapes. J Biomech 13:59–64CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, Lee B, Dunlap B (1999) A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24:1003–1009CrossRefPubMed Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, Lee B, Dunlap B (1999) A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 24:1003–1009CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, Diener H, Meade KP, Dunlap B, Hodges SD (2000) Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine 25:1548–1554PubMed Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, Diener H, Meade KP, Dunlap B, Hodges SD (2000) Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load. Spine 25:1548–1554PubMed
34.
go back to reference Pearsall DJ, Reid JG (1994) The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report. Sports Med 18:126–140PubMed Pearsall DJ, Reid JG (1994) The study of human body segment parameters in biomechanics. An historical review and current status report. Sports Med 18:126–140PubMed
35.
go back to reference Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Livingston LA (1996) Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann Biomed Eng 24:198–210PubMed Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Livingston LA (1996) Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Ann Biomed Eng 24:198–210PubMed
36.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F (1999) Loads on internal spinal fixators measured in different body positions. Eur Spine J 8:354–359CrossRefPubMed Rohlmann A, Bergmann G, Graichen F (1999) Loads on internal spinal fixators measured in different body positions. Eur Spine J 8:354–359CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Bergmann G (2000) Influence of load carrying on loads in internal spinal fixators. J Biomech 33:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Bergmann G (2000) Influence of load carrying on loads in internal spinal fixators. J Biomech 33:1099–1104CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Weber U, Bergmann G (2000) 2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device. Spine 25:2981–2986PubMed Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Weber U, Bergmann G (2000) 2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device. Spine 25:2981–2986PubMed
39.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Arntz U, Graichen F, Bergmann G (2001) Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during sitting. J Biomech 34:989–993CrossRefPubMed Rohlmann A, Arntz U, Graichen F, Bergmann G (2001) Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during sitting. J Biomech 34:989–993CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L, Bergmann G, Wilke HJ (2001) Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:E557–E561PubMed Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L, Bergmann G, Wilke HJ (2001) Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:E557–E561PubMed
41.
go back to reference Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24:2468–2474CrossRefPubMed Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24:2468–2474CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (2000) Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15:718–725 Shirazi-Adl A, Parnianpour M (2000) Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15:718–725
43.
go back to reference Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386PubMed Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE (1997) Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 10:380–386PubMed
44.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–62.CrossRefPubMed Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–62.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Rohlmann A, Neller S, Schultheiss M, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Claes LE (2001) Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator. Spine 26:636–642PubMed Wilke HJ, Rohlmann A, Neller S, Schultheiss M, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Claes LE (2001) Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator. Spine 26:636–642PubMed
Metadata
Title
Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading
Authors
Deed E. Harrison
Christopher J. Colloca
Donald D. Harrison
Tadeusz J. Janik
Jason W. Haas
Tony S. Keller
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0734-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

European Spine Journal 3/2005 Go to the issue

Announcements

April 2005