Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Anesthesia
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy

Authors: Min Hur, Seokha Yoo, Jung-Yoon Choi, Sun-Kyung Park, Dhong Eun Jung, Won Ho Kim, Jin-Tae Kim, Jae-Hyon Bahk

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dynamic change in central venous pressure (CVP) was associated with fluid responsiveness. External jugular venous pressure (EJVP) may reliably estimate CVP and have the advantages of being less invasive. We investigated whether increase in EJVP induced by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Methods

Fifty patients who underwent RALP with steep Trendelenburg position were enrolled. PEEP of 10 cmH2O was applied for 5 min and then 300 ml of colloid was administered. EJVP, stroke volume variation (SVV), and cardiac index calculated by pulse contour method were measured before and after the PEEP challenge and colloid administration. Increase in cardiac index > 10% was used to define the fluid responsiveness.

Results

Twenty-six patients were fluid responders. Neither the increase in EJVP after the initial PEEP nor SVV was significantly different between responders and non-responders. They were not significantly correlated with an increase in cardiac index. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these two variables were not significantly greater than 0.5. However, a post hoc analysis revealed that AUC of a decrease in EJVP after removal of PEEP was significantly greater than 0.50.

Conclusion

Our study results suggested that SVV and increase in EJVP after applying PEEP were not accurate predictors of fluid responsiveness during RALP. Further studies are required to find an adequate preload index in robot-assisted urologic surgery with steep Trendelenburg position.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC. Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:4–10.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Walsh M, Devereaux PJ, Garg AX, Kurz A, Turan A, Rodseth RN, Cywinski J, Thabane L, Sessler DI. Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:507–15.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Henaine R, Lehot JJ. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:513–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Biais M, Bernard O, Ha JC, Degryse C, Sztark F. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:407–13.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, Huneke R, Schalte G, Autschbach R, Rossaint R, Buhre W. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93:782–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:1069–75.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Meininger D, Westphal K, Bremerich DH, Runkel H, Probst M, Zwissler B, Byhahn C. Effects of posture and prolonged pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamic parameters during laparoscopy. World J Surg. 2008;32:1400–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Kalmar AF, Dewaele F, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Heeremans EH, Struys MM, Absalom A. Cerebral haemodynamic physiology during steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:478–84.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Schramm P, Treiber AH, Berres M, Pestel G, Engelhard K, Werner C, Closhen D. Time course of cerebrovascular autoregulation during extreme Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2014;69:58–63.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Chin JH, Lee EH, Hwang GS, Choi WJ. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using dynamic preload indices in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery with pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:515–22.PubMed
11.
Wajima Z, Shiga T, Imanaga K. Pneumoperitoneum affects stroke volume variation in humans. J Anesth. 2015;29:508–14.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Chin JH, Kim WJ, Choi JH, Han YA, Kim SO, Choi WJ. Unreliable tracking ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system for changes in stroke volume after fluid administration in patients with high systemic vascular resistance during laparoscopic surgery. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142125.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
De Backer D, Taccone FS, Holsten R, Ibrahimi F, Vincent JL. Influence of respiratory rate on stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1092–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, Weis FC, Kilger E, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:476–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kawazoe Y, Nakashima T, Iseri T, Yonetani C, Ueda K, Fujimoto Y, Kato S. The impact of inspiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and the evaluation of indexing stroke volume variation to inspiratory pressure under various preload conditions in experimental animals. J Anesth. 2015;29:515–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Cherpanath TG, Geerts BF, Maas JJ, de Wilde RB, Groeneveld AB, Jansen JR. Ventilator-induced central venous pressure variation can predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60:1395–403.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Geerts BF, Aarts LP, Groeneveld AB, Jansen JR. Predicting cardiac output responses to passive leg raising by a PEEP-induced increase in central venous pressure, in cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:150–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Magder S, Lagonidis D, Erice F. The use of respiratory variations in right atrial pressure to predict the cardiac output response to PEEP. J Crit Care. 2001;16:108–14.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Parker JL, Flucker CJ, Harvey N, Maguire AM, Russell WC, Thompson JP. Comparison of external jugular and central venous pressures in mechanically ventilated patient. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:596–600.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Leonard AD, Allsager CM, Parker JL, Swami A, Thompson JP. Comparison of central venous and external jugular venous pressures during repair of proximal femoral fracture. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:166–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Kim N, Shim JK, Choi HG, Kim MK, Kim JY, Kwak YL. Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in central venous pressure and passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:350–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2642–7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Hoiseth LO, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkeboen KA. Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:777–86.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Seo H, Kong YG, Jin SJ, Chin JH, Kim HY, Lee YK, Hwang JH, Kim YK. Dynamic arterial elastance in predicting arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1794.CrossRef
27.
Phong SV, Koh LK. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:281–5.PubMed
28.
Rosendal C, Markin S, Hien MD, Motsch J, Roggenbach J. Cardiac and hemodynamic consequences during capnoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning: lessons learned from robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26:383–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1672–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P, Annat G, Bendjelid K, Viale JP. Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:163–71.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Valenza F, Chevallard G, Porro GA, Gattinoni L. Static and dynamic components of esophageal and central venous pressure during intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1575–81.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care. 2011;15:R33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Atkinson TM, Giraud GD, Togioka BM, Jones DB, Cigarroa JE. Cardiovascular and ventilatory consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Circulation. 2017;135:700–10.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Nanas S, Magder S. Adaptations of the peripheral circulation to PEEP. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:688–93.CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Shojaee M, Sabzghabaei A, Alimohammadi H, Derakhshanfar H, Amini A, Esmailzadeh B. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on central venous pressure in patients under mechanical ventilation. Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5:e1.
37.
McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123–33.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Metzelder S, Coburn M, Fries M, Reinges M, Reich S, Rossaint R, Marx G, Rex S. Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:776–84.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Slagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determine cardiac output and stroke volume variation. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112:626–37.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Maddali MM, Waje ND, Sathiya PM. Authentication of radial versus femoral arterial pressure waveform-derived cardiac output with transesophageal echocardiography-derived cardiac output measurements in patients undergoing on-pump coronary bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31:1183–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;32:33–43.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Metadata
Title
Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy
Authors
Min Hur
Seokha Yoo
Jung-Yoon Choi
Sun-Kyung Park
Dhong Eun Jung
Won Ho Kim
Jin-Tae Kim
Jae-Hyon Bahk
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2475-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2018 Go to the issue

Original Article

Prevalence and associated factors of preoperative functional disability in elective surgical patients over 55 years old: a prospective cohort study

Original Article

Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, delayed graft function, and infection after kidney transplant: an observational cohort study

Guideline

Executive summary of the Clinical Guidelines of Pharmacotherapy for Neuropathic Pain: second edition by the Japanese Society of Pain Clinicians

Letter to the Editor

In reply: Why remifentanil?

Original Article

Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Clinical Report

Postoperative renal function in parturients with severe preeclampsia who underwent cesarean delivery: a retrospective observational study