Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 1/2011

01-02-2011 | Original Article

Comparison of Supreme® and Soft Seal® laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: a manikin study

Authors: Hanako Kohama, Nobuyasu Komasawa, Ryusuke Ueki, Aoi Samma, Masashi Nakagawa, Shin-ichi Nishi, Yoshiroh Kaminoh

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In the 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, the laryngeal mask (LMA) was proposed as an alternative to tracheal intubation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We compared the utility of a newly developed LMA, the Supreme® (Supreme), with a conventional LMA, the Soft Seal® (Soft Seal).

Methods

A total of 19 novice doctors in our anesthesia department performed insertion of the Supreme or Soft Seal on a manikin with or without chest compression. Insertion time and number of attempts for successful ventilation were measured. After successful ventilation, the amount of air entering the stomach and maximum ventilation pressure were measured. The subjective difficulty of using the devices was also measured.

Results

The ventilation success rate of first insertion did not differ between the Supreme and Soft Seal without chest compression. However, the success rate was significantly lower with the Soft Seal than the Supreme during chest compression. Insertion time was lengthened by chest compression with the Soft Seal, but not with the Supreme. Maximum ventilation pressure was higher with the Supreme than the Soft Seal. The amount of air entering the stomach was significantly lower with the Supreme than the Soft Seal. The Supreme also scored better than the Soft Seal on a visual analog scale of subjective difficulty in insertion.

Conclusions

The Supreme is an effective device for airway management during chest compression.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hazinski MF, Nadkarni VM, Hickey RW, O’Connor R, Becker LB, Zaritsky A. Major changes in the 2005 AHA guidelines for CPR and ECC: reaching the tipping point for change. Circulation. 2005;112:206–11.CrossRef Hazinski MF, Nadkarni VM, Hickey RW, O’Connor R, Becker LB, Zaritsky A. Major changes in the 2005 AHA guidelines for CPR and ECC: reaching the tipping point for change. Circulation. 2005;112:206–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gatward JJ, Thomas JC, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:351–6.CrossRefPubMed Gatward JJ, Thomas JC, Nolan JP, Cook TM. Effect of chest compressions on the time taken to insert airway devices in a manikin. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:351–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:260–3.CrossRefPubMed Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:260–3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:262–5.PubMed Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:262–5.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R, Clarke PA. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:555–62.CrossRefPubMed Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R, Clarke PA. Evaluation of the LMA Supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:555–62.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tan MG, Chin ER, Kong CS, Chan YH, Ip-Yam PC. Comparison of the re-usable LMA Classic and two single-use laryngeal masks (LMA Unique and SoftSeal) in airway management by novice personnel. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:739–43.PubMed Tan MG, Chin ER, Kong CS, Chan YH, Ip-Yam PC. Comparison of the re-usable LMA Classic and two single-use laryngeal masks (LMA Unique and SoftSeal) in airway management by novice personnel. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:739–43.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by Pentax-AWS Airwayscope®: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010 (in press). Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Evaluation of tracheal intubation in several positions by Pentax-AWS Airwayscope®: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010 (in press).
8.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of tracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) during chest compression: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:306–8.CrossRefPubMed Komasawa N, Ueki R, Nomura H, Itani M, Kaminoh Y. Comparison of tracheal intubation by Macintosh laryngoscope and Pentax-AWS (Airway Scope) during chest compression: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010;24:306–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Katz SH, Falk JL. Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wang HE, Simeone SJ, Weaver MD, Callaway CW. Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:645–52.CrossRefPubMed Wang HE, Simeone SJ, Weaver MD, Callaway CW. Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:645–52.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sørebø H, Svensson L, Fellows B, Steen PA. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005;293:299–304.CrossRefPubMed Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, Sørebø H, Svensson L, Fellows B, Steen PA. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005;293:299–304.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.CrossRefPubMed Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Berg RA, Sanders AB, Ewy GA. Importance of continuous chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: improved outcome during a simulated single lay-rescuer scenario. Circulation. 2002;105:645–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Klouche K, Povoas H, Bisera J. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:368–72.CrossRefPubMed Yu T, Weil MH, Tang W, Sun S, Klouche K, Povoas H, Bisera J. Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation. Circulation. 2002;106:368–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Coulson A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Wiseman L, Ingham T, Cheung D, Popwycz L, Hall B. A comparison of the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel after manikin-only training. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31:286–9.PubMed Coulson A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Wiseman L, Ingham T, Cheung D, Popwycz L, Hall B. A comparison of the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel after manikin-only training. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31:286–9.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:852–7.CrossRefPubMed Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:852–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme: a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:79–83.CrossRefPubMed Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme: a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:79–83.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:1010–4.CrossRefPubMed Ali A, Canturk S, Turkmen A, Turgut N, Altan A. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Classic in adults. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:1010–4.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask Supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:55–62.CrossRefPubMed Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask Supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:55–62.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme—a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:405–10.CrossRefPubMed Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme—a new single-use LMA with gastric access: a report on its clinical efficacy. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:405–10.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:815–9.PubMed Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT. Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:815–9.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Ho BY, Skinner HJ, Mahajan RP. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:921–4.CrossRefPubMed Ho BY, Skinner HJ, Mahajan RP. Gastro-oesophageal reflux during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:921–4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:260–3.CrossRefPubMed Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24:260–3.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Alexander R, Hodgson P, Lomax D, Bullen C. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and Guedel airway, bag and face mask for manual ventilation following formal training. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:231–4.CrossRefPubMed Alexander R, Hodgson P, Lomax D, Bullen C. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and Guedel airway, bag and face mask for manual ventilation following formal training. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:231–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Adnet F, Cydulka RK, Lapandry C. Emergency tracheal intubation of patients lying supine on the ground: influence of operator body position. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:266–9.CrossRefPubMed Adnet F, Cydulka RK, Lapandry C. Emergency tracheal intubation of patients lying supine on the ground: influence of operator body position. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:266–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Validation of the Pentax-AWS Airway Scope utility as an intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth. 2010;24:582–6.CrossRefPubMed Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y. Validation of the Pentax-AWS Airway Scope utility as an intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth. 2010;24:582–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, Dumerat M, Motamed C, Sauvat S, Duvaldestin P, Dhonneur G. Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1146–50.CrossRefPubMed Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, Dumerat M, Motamed C, Sauvat S, Duvaldestin P, Dhonneur G. Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1146–50.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9.CrossRefPubMed Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:33–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Cattano D, Panicucci E, Paolicchi A, Forfori F, Giunta F, Hagberg C. Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: an Italian survey of 1956 patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1774–9.CrossRefPubMed Cattano D, Panicucci E, Paolicchi A, Forfori F, Giunta F, Hagberg C. Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: an Italian survey of 1956 patients. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1774–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, MacQuarrie K, Law JA, Pytka S, Imrie D, Field C. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:23–7.CrossRefPubMed Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, MacQuarrie K, Law JA, Pytka S, Imrie D, Field C. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:23–7.CrossRefPubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Jordan GM, Silsby J, Bayley G, Cook TM, Difficult Airway Society. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:708–12.CrossRefPubMed Jordan GM, Silsby J, Bayley G, Cook TM, Difficult Airway Society. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:708–12.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Supreme® and Soft Seal® laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: a manikin study
Authors
Hanako Kohama
Nobuyasu Komasawa
Ryusuke Ueki
Aoi Samma
Masashi Nakagawa
Shin-ichi Nishi
Yoshiroh Kaminoh
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-1054-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of Anesthesia 1/2011 Go to the issue