Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Gastroenterology
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Ultrasound | Review

Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling

Authors: Pujan Kandel, Michael B. Wallace

Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique plays an essential role for evaluation of gastrointestinal tumors. Several components affect the yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition outcomes such as sampling techniques, use of ROSE (rapid onsite evaluation), training and experience, and needle designs. In this review we discuss advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling.
Literature
1.
Kandel P, Wallace MB. Optimizing endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue sampling of the pancreas. JOP J Pancreas. 2016;17:160–5.
2.
Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, et al. Aproppiate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1127–31.CrossRef
3.
Keswani RN, Krishnan K, Wani S, et al. Addition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration and on-site cytology to EUS-guided fine needle biopsy increases procedure time but not diagnostic accuracy. Clin Endosc. 2014;47:242–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(939–959):e937.
5.
Fujii LL, Levy MJ. Pitfalls in EUS FNA. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:125–42.CrossRef
6.
Alomari AK, Ustun B, Aslanian HR, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of secondary tumors involving the pancreas: an institution’s experience. Cyto J. 2016;13:1.
7.
Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 2010;42:300–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Patil R, Ona MA, Papafragkakis C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of adrenal lesions. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29:307–11.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Levy MJ, Abu Dayyeh BK, Fujii LL, et al. Detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis by EUS fine-needle aspiration: impact on staging and resectability (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1215–24.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Levy MJ, Gleeson FC, Zhang L. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration detection of extravascular migratory metastasis from a remotely located pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:246–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Dumonceau JM, Deprez PH, Jenssen C, et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline—updated January 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:695–714.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:966–75.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, et al. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:319–31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Puli SR, Bechtold ML, Buxbaum JL, et al. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2013;42:20–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Thornton GD, McPhail MJ, Nayagam S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2013;13:48–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Woolf KMW, Liang H, Sletten ZJ, et al. False-negative rate of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic solid and cystic lesions with matched surgical resections as the gold standard. Cancer Cytopathology. 2013;121:449–58.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Dietrich CF, Annema JT, Clementsen P, et al. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:E311–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Tournoy KG, Praet MM, Van Maele G, et al. Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration with an on-site cytopathologist: high accuracy for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Chest. 2005;128:3004–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Sǎftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:117–25.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Jue TL, Sharaf RN, Appalaneni V, et al. Role of EUS for the evaluation of mediastinal adenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:239–45.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Yasuda I, Goto N, Tsurumi H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders: feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:397–404.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Al-Haddad M, Savabi MS, Sherman S, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with flow cytometry to diagnose lymphoma: a single center experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Aust). 2009;24:1826–33.CrossRef
24.
Mehra M, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. EUS-guided FNA combined with flow cytometry in the diagnoses of suspected or recurrent intrathoracic or retroperitoneal lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:508–13.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nakahara O, Yamao K, Bhatia V, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for undiagnosed intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:562–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Puli SR, Batapati Krishna Reddy J, Bechtold ML, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: it’s accuracy in evaluating mediastinal lymphadenopathy? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3028–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Bhutani MS. Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided mediastinal lymph node aspiration: does the end justify the means? Chest. 2000;117:298–301.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Vilmann P, Clementsen PF, Colella S, et al. Combined endobronchial and oesophageal endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline, in cooperation with the european respiratory society (ERS) and the European society of thoracic surgeons (ESTS). Euro Respir J. 2015;46:40–60.CrossRef
29.
Yamabe A, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscope for small gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E161–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, et al. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:1479–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
TenBerge J, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of the liver: indications, yield, and safety based on an international survey of 167 cases. Gastrointestinal Endosc. 2002;55:859–62.CrossRef
32.
Jani BS, Rzouq F, Saligram S, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review of technical and procedural variables. North Am J Med Sci. 2016;8:1–11.CrossRef
33.
Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:811–4.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Shahidi N, Ou G, Lam E, et al. When trainees reach competency in performing endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E239-e243.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Weston BR, Bhutani MS. Optimizing diagnostic yield for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a technical review. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;9:352–63.
36.
Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Elwassief A, Paquin SC, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology and biopsy in the evaluation of lymphoma. Endosc Ultrasound. 2012;1:17–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Carrara S, Anderloni A, Jovani M, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing 25-G and 22-G needles of a new platform for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid masses. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48:49–54.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini F, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43:709–15.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Vilmann P, Saftoiu A, Hollerbach S, et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:877–83.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Lee JH, Stewart J, Ross WA, et al. Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2274–81.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–7.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DA, et al. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy. 2009;41:445–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Siddiqui AA, Lyles T, Avula H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses in a veteran population: comparison of results with 22- and 25-gauge needles. Pancreas. 2010;39:685–6.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini F, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43:709–15.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Uehara H, Ikezawa K, Kawada N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic malignancy in relation to the size of lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Aust). 2011;26:1256–61.CrossRef
46.
Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi A, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia AP, et al. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1026–34.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni A, et al. Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy. 2005;37:362–6.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Hasan M, Ramesh J, Bang JY, et al. 100 multi-center randomized trial comparing the 19G and 25G needles for EUS-guided FNA of large solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;9(5, Supplement):AB112.CrossRef
51.
Wang K-X, Ben Q-W, Jin Z-D, et al. Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:283–90.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Gress F, Michael H, Gelrud D, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:864–7.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T, et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Aust). 2009;24:384–90.CrossRef
54.
Gerke H, Rizk MK, Vanderheyden AD, et al. Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction. Cytopathology. 2010;21:44–51.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36:397–401.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology. 2006;17:27–33.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, et al. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:185–90.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Aithal GP, Anagnostropoulos GK, Tam W, et al. EUS-guided tissue sampling: comparison of “dual sampling” (trucut biopsy plus FNA) with “sequential sampling” (trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy. 2007;39:725–30.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Berger LPV, Scheffer RCH, Weusten BLAM, et al. The additional value of EUS-guided Tru-cut biopsy to EUS-guided FNA in patients with mediastinal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1045–51.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Cho CM, Al-Haddad M, LeBlanc JK, et al. Rescue Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-guided trucut biopsy following suboptimal EUS-guided fine needle aspiration for mediastinal lesions. Gut and Liver. 2013;7:150–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Dewitt J, Emerson RE, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2011;25:2192–202.CrossRef
62.
Ginès A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, et al. Prospective study of a trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:597–601.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Ribeiro A, Pereira D, Escalón MP, et al. EUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:851–5.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Yun SS, Remotti H, Vazquez MF, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsies of pancreatic masses: comparison between fine needle aspirations and needle core biopsies. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:276–82.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Alatawi A, Beuvon F, Grabar S, et al. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. United Euro Gastroenterol J. 2015;3:343–52.CrossRef
66.
Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:347–54.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–49.PubMed
68.
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1040–6.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1034–9.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1017–24.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Hasan MK, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: initial assessment. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:338–46.CrossRefPubMed
72.
El H II, Wu H, Reuss S, et al. Prospective assessment of the performance of a new fine needle biopsy device for EUS-guided sampling of solid lesions. Clinical Endosc. 2018;51:576.CrossRef
73.
Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, et al. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1432–8.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, et al. Randomized trial comparing the franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1432–8.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Al-Haddad M. Fine-needle biopsy sampling under EUS guidance: is one needle tip really better than the other? Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1163.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–10.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS, et al. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1429.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Aadam AA, Wani S, Amick A, et al. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E497–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, et al. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1040–6.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Fabbri C, Fuccio L, Fornelli A, et al. The presence of rapid on-site evaluation did not increase the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions with core needle. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:225–30.CrossRefPubMed
81.
Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:872–82.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Wani S, Early D, Kunkel J, et al. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:328–35.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Kim JH, Park SW, Kim MK, et al. Meta-analysis for cyto-pathological outcomes in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration with and without the stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2175–84.CrossRefPubMed
84.
Abe Y, Kawakami H, Oba K, et al. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(837–844):e831.
85.
Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KH, et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:745–51.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Kin T, Katanuma A, Yane K, et al. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:900–7.CrossRefPubMed
87.
Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJ, et al. “Wet suction technique (WEST)”: a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1401–7.CrossRefPubMed
88.
Mennone A, Nathanson MH. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy to assess liver histology in vivo. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:338–44.CrossRefPubMed
89.
Becker V, Wallace MB, Fockens P, et al. Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo histology of intra-abdominal organs: first results in a porcine model (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1260–6.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Giovannini M, Caillol F, Monges G, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses. Endoscopy. 2016;48:892–8.CrossRefPubMed
91.
Kongkam P, Pittayanon R, Sampatanukul P, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (ENES): a pilot study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E17–23.PubMed
92.
Konda VJA, Aslanian HR, Wallace MB, et al. First assessment of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy during EUS–FNA procedures of the pancreas (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1049–60.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Karstensen JG, Cartana T, Constantinescu C, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses—a prospective validation study. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E78–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
94.
Bhutani MS, Koduru P, Joshi V, et al. EUS-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a novel technique with emerging applications. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;11:235.
95.
Chang KJ, Samarasena JB, Nakai Y, et al. Mo1502 endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided biopsy of the pancreas surface using a novel “through-the-needle” technique: can we biopsy the pancreas without trauma to the ducts? Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:AB405–6.CrossRef
96.
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, et al. A pilot study of EUS-guided through-the-needle forceps biopsy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:158–62.CrossRefPubMed
97.
Shakhatreh MH, Naini SR, Brijbassie AA, et al. Use of a novel through-the-needle biopsy forceps in endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E439–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Kovacevic B, Karstensen JG, Havre RF, et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided microbiopsy forceps in diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions: a multicenter feasibility study (with video). Endosc Ultrasound. 2018;7(6):383.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
99.
Wani S, Muthusamy VR, McGrath CM, et al. AGA white paper: optimizing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:318–27.CrossRefPubMed
100.
101.
Wei S, Lieberman D, Morrissette JJ, et al. Using “residual” FNA rinse and body fluid specimens for next-generation sequencing: an institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:324–9.CrossRefPubMed
102.
Aisner DL, Rumery MD, Merrick DT, et al. Do more with less: tips and techniques for maximizing small biopsy and cytology specimens for molecular and ancillary testing: the university of Colorado experience. Arch Pathol lab Med. 2016;140(11):1206–20.CrossRef
103.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Chen H, Singh RR, et al. Concurrent fine needle aspirations and core needle biopsies: a comparative study of substrates for next-generation sequencing in solid organ malignancies. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:499–508.CrossRef
104.
Rodriguez SA, Impey SD, Pelz C, et al. RNA sequencing distinguishes benign from malignant pancreatic lesions sampled by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:252–8.CrossRefPubMed
105.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Stewart J. Preanalytic variables in cytology: lessons learned from next-generation sequencing-the MD anderson experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(11):1191–9.CrossRef
106.
Tiriac H, Bucobo JC, Tzimas D, et al. Successful creation of pancreatic cancer organoids by means of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling for personalized cancer treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1474–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
107.
108.
Kim MP, Evans DB, Wang H, et al. Generation of orthotopic and heterotopic human pancreatic cancer xenografts in immunodeficient mice. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1670–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
109.
Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1034–9.CrossRefPubMed
110.
Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1017–24.CrossRefPubMed
111.
Kandel P, Nassar A, Graddy C, et al. Mo1345 whole exome sequencing and genomic profiling of pancreas tumor tissue obtained with a novelfork-tipped eus guided fine needle core biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:455–6.CrossRef
112.
Suzuki R, Thosani N, Annangi S, Guha S, Bhutani MS. Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA-based cytology distinguishing malignant and benign IPMNs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatol off J Intern Assoc Pancreatol. (IAP) 2014;14(5):380–84.CrossRef
113.
Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathol off J Br Soc Clin Cytol. 2013;24(3):159–71.CrossRef
114.
Larghi A, Fuccio L, Chiarello G, et al. Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope. Endoscopy. 2014;46(1):39–45.PubMed
115.
Turhan N, Aydog G, Ozin Y, Cicek B, Kurt M, Oguz D. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective study of 50 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39(11):808–17.CrossRefPubMed
116.
Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami F, et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(2):290–98.e291.
117.
Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V, Konjeti R, Vargo JJ, Parsi MA. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):168–76.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling
Authors
Pujan Kandel
Michael B. Wallace
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01552-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Journal of Gastroenterology 5/2019 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Meaningless comparison of resection depth between cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection

Letter to the Editor

Response to the letter by Sumida et al. regarding our manuscript “Evaluation of ballooned hepatocytes as a risk factor for future progression of fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”

Correction

Correction to: Proton pump inhibitor monotherapy is effective to attenuate dyspepsia symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter prospective observational study

Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Linked color imaging can enhance recognition of early gastric cancer by high color contrast to surrounding gastric intestinal metaplasia

Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

NS5A-P32 deletion as a factor involved in virologic failure in patients receiving glecaprevir and pibrentasvir

Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Independent and additive effects of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 polymorphisms on the development of non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Heart Failure Video

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch now

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits