Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

A simple morphological classification to estimate the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Authors: Atsushi Oba, Atsushi Kudo, Keiichi Akahoshi, Mitsuhiro Kishino, Takumi Akashi, Eriko Katsuta, Yasuhito Iwao, Hiroaki Ono, Yusuke Mitsunori, Daisuke Ban, Shinji Tanaka, Yoshinobu Eishi, Ukihide Tateishi, Minoru Tanabe

Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A novel morphological classification using resected specimens predicted malignant potential and prognosis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs). The aim of this study was to examine the predictive ability of morphological diagnoses made using non-invasive multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in P-NETs.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2015, 154 patients were diagnosed with P-NETs at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, and 82 patients who underwent surgical treatment were enrolled. The primary tumors were classified by MDCT into three types: Type I, simple nodular tumor; Type II, simple nodular tumor with extra-nodular growth; and Type III, confluent multinodular tumor. Patients were stratified by 15 clinical specialists according to classification and without any other clinical or pathological information. Clinicopathological features and patient survival were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

The mean observation time was 1004 days. Forty-six, 22, and 14 patients had Type I, II, and III tumors, respectively. Morphological classification was significantly correlated with advanced features such as tumor size, Ki-67 index, and synchronous liver metastasis (p < 0.001 for all). There were significant differences between all three tumor types as judged by ENETS TNM classification (p < 0.001), AJCC TNM classification (p = 0.046), WHO 2004 classification (p < 0.001), and WHO 2010 classification (p < 0.001). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for patients with Type I, II, and III tumors were 97, 43, and 31%, respectively (I vs. II, p < 0.001; I vs. III, p < 0.001; II vs. III, p = 0.017). Multivariate analysis revealed Type II/III tumors and synchronous liver metastasis to be independent risk factors for poor PFS.

Conclusion

A novel simple morphological classification system would predict Type II and III tumors that may have higher malignant potential than Type I tumors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, et al. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.CrossRefPubMed Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, et al. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.CrossRefPubMed Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–72.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ito T, Igarashi H, Nakamura K, et al. Epidemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:58–64.CrossRefPubMed Ito T, Igarashi H, Nakamura K, et al. Epidemiological trends of pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors in Japan: a nationwide survey analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:58–64.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ito T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT. Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:941–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ito T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT. Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): recent insights and advances. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:941–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kloppel G. Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18(Suppl 1):S1–16.CrossRefPubMed Kloppel G. Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2011;18(Suppl 1):S1–16.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:120–34.CrossRefPubMed Falconi M, Bartsch DK, Eriksson B, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: well-differentiated pancreatic non-functioning tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:120–34.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010. pp.13–14. Rindi G, Arnold R, Bosman FT, et al. Nomenclature and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010. pp.13–14.
8.
go back to reference Katsuta E, Kudo A, Akashi T, et al. Macroscopic morphology for estimation of malignant potential in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:1299–306.CrossRefPubMed Katsuta E, Kudo A, Akashi T, et al. Macroscopic morphology for estimation of malignant potential in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142:1299–306.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nakayama H, Takayama T, Okubo T, et al. Proposal of objective morphological classification system for hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative multiphase computed tomography. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1430–7.CrossRefPubMed Nakayama H, Takayama T, Okubo T, et al. Proposal of objective morphological classification system for hepatocellular carcinoma using preoperative multiphase computed tomography. J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:1430–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Inayoshi J, Ichida T, Sugitani S, et al. Gross appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma reflects E-cadherin expression and risk of early recurrence after surgical treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:673–7.CrossRefPubMed Inayoshi J, Ichida T, Sugitani S, et al. Gross appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma reflects E-cadherin expression and risk of early recurrence after surgical treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:673–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nagano Y, Shimada H, Takeda K, et al. Predictive factors of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm. World J Surg. 2008;32:2218–22.CrossRefPubMed Nagano Y, Shimada H, Takeda K, et al. Predictive factors of microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm. World J Surg. 2008;32:2218–22.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shimada M, Rikimaru T, Hamatsu T, et al. The role of macroscopic classification in nodular-type hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;182:177–82.CrossRefPubMed Shimada M, Rikimaru T, Hamatsu T, et al. The role of macroscopic classification in nodular-type hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001;182:177–82.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Murakata A, Tanaka S, Mogushi K, et al. Gene expression signature of the gross morphology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011;253:94–100.CrossRefPubMed Murakata A, Tanaka S, Mogushi K, et al. Gene expression signature of the gross morphology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2011;253:94–100.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Horton KM, Hruban RH, Yeo C, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Radiographics. 2006;26:453–64.CrossRefPubMed Horton KM, Hruban RH, Yeo C, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row CT of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Radiographics. 2006;26:453–64.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology. 2006;6:77–85.CrossRefPubMed Rodallec M, Vilgrain V, Couvelard A, et al. Endocrine pancreatic tumours and helical CT: contrast enhancement is correlated with microvascular density, histoprognostic factors and survival. Pancreatology. 2006;6:77–85.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference d’Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. Radiology. 2009;250:407–16.CrossRefPubMed d’Assignies G, Couvelard A, Bahrami S, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. Radiology. 2009;250:407–16.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yamada S, Fujii T, Suzuki K, et al. Preoperative identification of a prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Pancreas. 2016;45:198–203.CrossRefPubMed Yamada S, Fujii T, Suzuki K, et al. Preoperative identification of a prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors using multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Pancreas. 2016;45:198–203.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Luo G, Javed A, Strosberg JR, et al. Modified staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on the basis of the american joint committee on cancer and european neuroendocrine tumor society systems. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:274–80.CrossRefPubMed Luo G, Javed A, Strosberg JR, et al. Modified staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on the basis of the american joint committee on cancer and european neuroendocrine tumor society systems. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:274–80.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A simple morphological classification to estimate the malignant potential of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Authors
Atsushi Oba
Atsushi Kudo
Keiichi Akahoshi
Mitsuhiro Kishino
Takumi Akashi
Eriko Katsuta
Yasuhito Iwao
Hiroaki Ono
Yusuke Mitsunori
Daisuke Ban
Shinji Tanaka
Yoshinobu Eishi
Ukihide Tateishi
Minoru Tanabe
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1349-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Journal of Gastroenterology 10/2017 Go to the issue