Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Assessment of an electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study

Authors: Hirotsugu Watabe, Tetsuya Nakamura, Atsuo Yamada, Yasuo Kakugawa, Sadaharu Nouda, Akira Terano

Published in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Training for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) procedures is currently performed as a lecture and hands-on seminar. The aims of this pilot study were to assess the utility of an electronic learning system for CCE (ELCCE) designed for the Japanese Association for Capsule Endoscopy using an objective scoring engine, and to evaluate the efficacy of ELCCE on the acquisition of CCE reading competence.

Methods

ELCCE is an Internet-based learning system with the following steps: step 1, introduction; step 2, CCE reading competence assessment test (CCAT), which evaluates the competence of CCE reading prior to training; step 3, learning reading theory; step 4, training with guidance; step 5, training without guidance; step 6, final assessment; and step 7, the same as step 2. The CCAT, step 5 and step 6 were scored automatically according to: lesion detection, diagnosis (location, size, shape of lesion), management recommendations, and quality of view. Ten trainee endoscopists were initially recruited (cohort 1), followed by a validating cohort of 11 trainee endoscopists (cohort 2).

Results

All but one participant finished ELCCE training within 7 weeks. In step 6, accuracy ranged from 53 to 98 % and was not impacted by step 2 pretest scores. The average CCAT scores significantly increased between step 2 pretest and step 7 in both cohorts, from 42 ± 18 % to 79 ± 15 % in cohort 1 (p = 0.0004), and from 52 ± 15 % to 79 ± 14 % in cohort 2 (p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

ELCCE is useful and effective for improving CCE reading competence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.CrossRefPubMed Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE, Rex DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:770–5 quiz 711.CrossRefPubMed Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE, Rex DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:770–5 quiz 711.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Centers for Disease C. Prevention: use of colorectal cancer tests–USA, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:253–8. Centers for Disease C. Prevention: use of colorectal cancer tests–USA, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:253–8.
10.
go back to reference Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, et al. Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:963–70.CrossRefPubMed Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, et al. Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:963–70.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam colon capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123–7.CrossRefPubMed Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam colon capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R, et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1046–50.CrossRefPubMed Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R, et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1046–50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:735–8.CrossRefPubMed Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:735–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.CrossRefPubMed Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Postgate A, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. Computer-aided learning in capsule endoscopy leads to improvement in lesion recognition ability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:310–6.CrossRefPubMed Postgate A, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. Computer-aided learning in capsule endoscopy leads to improvement in lesion recognition ability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:310–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lai LH, Wong GL, Chow DK, et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:283–6.CrossRefPubMed Lai LH, Wong GL, Chow DK, et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:283–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of an electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study
Authors
Hirotsugu Watabe
Tetsuya Nakamura
Atsuo Yamada
Yasuo Kakugawa
Sadaharu Nouda
Akira Terano
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-015-1134-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2016 Go to the issue