Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original Article

Assessing the utility of a distress screening tool at capturing sexual concerns in a gyne-oncology follow-up clinic

Authors: Lauren M. Walker, Majken P. Villiger, John W. Robinson

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Communication and assessment of sexual health within cancer care is poor despite high rates of sexual dysfunction in cancer survivors. Screening for distress programs have been implemented, as a standardized part of cancer care across Canada, with the aim of increasing identification and improving access to support. Alberta Health Services uses a general distress screening form, containing the Canadian Problem Checklist, which includes a list of possible problems, one of which is “intimacy/sexuality.” Theoretically, the discreet nature of the screening for distress form may reduce patient discomfort in disclosing sexual concerns verbally, and therefore help health care providers identify patients requiring intervention. This study aims to determine the adequacy of this distress screening tool in identifying gynecological cancer patients who have an intimacy/sexuality concern.

Methods

A chart review was conducted on all follow-up visits in a gyne-oncology clinic over 1 year. Each patient’s chart was reviewed to determine the prevalence of the distress screening form completion, prevalence of the “intimacy/sexuality” item being checked, and documentation of actions taken to address any reported intimacy/sexuality problems.

Results

Seven hundred thirty patient visits were recorded during this period with completed distress screening forms found on 79.0% (n = 577) of charts. Only 6% of the patients indicated an intimacy/sexuality concern on this form. Of those, only one third had documentation that their problem was addressed.

Conclusions

These results call into question the utility of the intimacy/sexuality item on the Canadian Problem Checklist to identify gynecological cancer patients who have sexual concerns. Furthermore, even among those patients who indicated concerns, there is evidence that their problems are rarely addressed. Providers need to directly inquire with patients about their sexual health.
Footnotes
1
Note patients may have been offered more than one piece of advice.
 
Literature
6.
go back to reference Picker NCR (2013) Alberta Health Services Corporate Report: February–August 2013 Picker NCR (2013) Alberta Health Services Corporate Report: February–August 2013
8.
go back to reference Bourgeois-Law G, Lotocki R (1999) Sexuality and gynecological cancer: a needs assessment. CJHS 8:231 Bourgeois-Law G, Lotocki R (1999) Sexuality and gynecological cancer: a needs assessment. CJHS 8:231
11.
go back to reference Schover LR (1997) Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Wiley, New York Schover LR (1997) Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Wiley, New York
12.
go back to reference Carr S (2011) Communication about sexuality and cancer. In: Mulhall JP, Incrocci L, Goldstein I, Rosen R (eds) Cancer and sexual health, 1st ed. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 307–316CrossRef Carr S (2011) Communication about sexuality and cancer. In: Mulhall JP, Incrocci L, Goldstein I, Rosen R (eds) Cancer and sexual health, 1st ed. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 307–316CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Watson L (2014) Screening for distress: evaluation data update Watson L (2014) Screening for distress: evaluation data update
21.
go back to reference Watson L, Groff S, Tamagawa R et al (2016) Evaluating the impact of provincial implementation of screening for distress on quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being in patients with cancer. JNCCN 14:164–172PubMed Watson L, Groff S, Tamagawa R et al (2016) Evaluating the impact of provincial implementation of screening for distress on quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being in patients with cancer. JNCCN 14:164–172PubMed
22.
go back to reference Tamagawa R, Groff S, Looyis J et al (2016) The effects of a provincial-wide implementation of screening for distress on healthcare professionals’ confidence and understanding of person-centered care in oncology. JNCCN 6:1259–1266 Tamagawa R, Groff S, Looyis J et al (2016) The effects of a provincial-wide implementation of screening for distress on healthcare professionals’ confidence and understanding of person-centered care in oncology. JNCCN 6:1259–1266
23.
go back to reference Howell D, Keshavarz H, Esplen MJ, et al. (2015) A pan-Canadian practice guideline: screening, assessment and care of psychosocial distress (depression, anxiety) in adults with cancer, Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Advisory Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosoci. CAPO Howell D, Keshavarz H, Esplen MJ, et al. (2015) A pan-Canadian practice guideline: screening, assessment and care of psychosocial distress (depression, anxiety) in adults with cancer, Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Advisory Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosoci. CAPO
24.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuenhn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed Bruera E, Kuenhn N, Miller MJ et al (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed
26.
go back to reference College of physicians and surgeons of Ontario (2012) CPSO Policy Statement-Medical Records College of physicians and surgeons of Ontario (2012) CPSO Policy Statement-Medical Records
Metadata
Title
Assessing the utility of a distress screening tool at capturing sexual concerns in a gyne-oncology follow-up clinic
Authors
Lauren M. Walker
Majken P. Villiger
John W. Robinson
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3905-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine