Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017

01-10-2017 | Original Article

Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure—results from a prospective study

Authors: Anneke Ullrich, Hilke M. Rath, Ullrich Otto, Christa Kerschgens, Martin Raida, Christa Hagen-Aukamp, Corinna Bergelt

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Approximately 60% of patients are able to work following a cancer diagnosis. The return-to-work (RTW) process after disability can be conceptualized as a multi-phase construct. This study investigated RTW outcomes throughout the RTW process among survivors of prostate cancer (PC) attending a cancer rehabilitation measure.

Methods

The study was based on a sample of 837 employed PC survivors enrolled in a longitudinal multicenter study. Data was collected at the beginning of the rehabilitation measure, at the end and at 12-month follow-up by means of self-report questionnaires. We compared outcomes with regard to age (<60 and ≥60 years) and socio-economic status (SES; lower, middle, higher) using t tests or univariate ANOVA for metrical and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Results

In the off-work phase, most survivors reported positive expectations regarding future work, including responsiveness of their work environment. Nevertheless, one fourth intended to apply for a disability pension. At 12-month follow-up, the RTW rate was 87% and 62% when applying more conservative criteria of RTW. Among survivors who had returned to work, most reported stability of the work situation. Survivors with lower SES showed least favorable outcomes throughout the RTW process, while older age was less consistently of negative impact.

Conclusions

Survivors reported many favorable RTW outcomes, but low SES might be a barrier at various stages of the RTW process. Thus, special attention must be paid to the role of social inequalities during rehabilitation and work reintegration to help survivors managing the RTW process.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, Patient to Cancer Survivor (2005) Lost in transition. Institute of Medicine and National Research, Washington Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, Patient to Cancer Survivor (2005) Lost in transition. Institute of Medicine and National Research, Washington
3.
go back to reference Peteet JR (2005) Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 22:200–205CrossRef Peteet JR (2005) Cancer and the meaning of work. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 22:200–205CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mehnert A (2011) Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol/ Hematol 77:109–130CrossRef Mehnert A (2011) Employment and work-related issues in cancer survivors. Crit Rev Oncol/ Hematol 77:109–130CrossRef
5.
go back to reference van Muijen P, Weevers NL, Snels IA et al (2013) Predictors of return to work and employment in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 22:144–160CrossRef van Muijen P, Weevers NL, Snels IA et al (2013) Predictors of return to work and employment in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 22:144–160CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC et al (2010) Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv 4:415–437CrossRefPubMed Feuerstein M, Todd BL, Moskowitz MC et al (2010) Work in cancer survivors: a model for practice and research. J Cancer Surviv 4:415–437CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT et al (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17:766–781CrossRefPubMed Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT et al (2007) Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 17:766–781CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mehnert A, Koch U (2012) Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39:76–87CrossRefPubMed Mehnert A, Koch U (2012) Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39:76–87CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Böttcher H, Steimann M, Ullrich A et al (2013) Work-related predictors of not returning to work after inpatient rehabilitation in cancer patients. Acta Oncol 52:1067–1075CrossRefPubMed Böttcher H, Steimann M, Ullrich A et al (2013) Work-related predictors of not returning to work after inpatient rehabilitation in cancer patients. Acta Oncol 52:1067–1075CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Robert Koch-Institute and the Society of the Epidemiological Cancer Registries in Germany (2015) [Cancer in Germany 2011/2012 (Vol. 10)]. Berlin Robert Koch-Institute and the Society of the Epidemiological Cancer Registries in Germany (2015) [Cancer in Germany 2011/2012 (Vol. 10)]. Berlin
12.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z et al (2005) Employment outcomes of men treated for PC. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:958–965CrossRefPubMed Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z et al (2005) Employment outcomes of men treated for PC. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:958–965CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M (2006) Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and PC patients in the months following diagnosis. Psychooncology 15:739–747CrossRefPubMed Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M (2006) Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and PC patients in the months following diagnosis. Psychooncology 15:739–747CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dahl S, Steinsvik E, Dahl A et al (2014) Return to work and sick leave after radical prostatectomy: a prospective clinical study. Acta Oncol 53:744–751CrossRefPubMed Dahl S, Steinsvik E, Dahl A et al (2014) Return to work and sick leave after radical prostatectomy: a prospective clinical study. Acta Oncol 53:744–751CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Oberst K, Bradley CJ, Gardiner JC et al (2010) Work task disability in employed breast and PC patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:322–330CrossRefPubMed Oberst K, Bradley CJ, Gardiner JC et al (2010) Work task disability in employed breast and PC patients. J Cancer Surviv 4:322–330CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ et al (2011) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007569 de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ et al (2011) Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD007569
17.
go back to reference Hellbom M, Bergelt C, Bergenmar M et al (2011) Cancer rehabilitation: a Nordic and European perspective. Acta Oncol 50:179–186CrossRefPubMed Hellbom M, Bergelt C, Bergenmar M et al (2011) Cancer rehabilitation: a Nordic and European perspective. Acta Oncol 50:179–186CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gerdes N, Zwingmann C, Jäckel WH (2006) The system of rehabilitation in Germany. In: Jäckel WH, Bengel J, Herdt J (eds) Research in rehabilitation. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 3–19 Gerdes N, Zwingmann C, Jäckel WH (2006) The system of rehabilitation in Germany. In: Jäckel WH, Bengel J, Herdt J (eds) Research in rehabilitation. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 3–19
19.
go back to reference Ullrich A, Böttcher HM, Bergelt C (2012) Gender-related aspects of returning to work in cancer survivors. A systematic review. Bundesgesundheitsbla 55:516–532CrossRef Ullrich A, Böttcher HM, Bergelt C (2012) Gender-related aspects of returning to work in cancer survivors. A systematic review. Bundesgesundheitsbla 55:516–532CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Young A, Roessler RT, Wasiak R et al (2005) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15:557–568CrossRefPubMed Young A, Roessler RT, Wasiak R et al (2005) A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 15:557–568CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bürger W, Deck R (2009) SIBAR—a short screening instrument for the assessment of need for occupation related treatment in medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 48:211–221CrossRefPubMed Bürger W, Deck R (2009) SIBAR—a short screening instrument for the assessment of need for occupation related treatment in medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 48:211–221CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bürger W, Dietsche S, Morfeld M et al (2001) Multiperspective estimates on the probability of patient return to work following orthopaedic rehabilitation: findings and predictive relevancy. Rehabilitation 40:217–225CrossRefPubMed Bürger W, Dietsche S, Morfeld M et al (2001) Multiperspective estimates on the probability of patient return to work following orthopaedic rehabilitation: findings and predictive relevancy. Rehabilitation 40:217–225CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al (1998) Work ability index, 2nd, revised edn. Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al (1998) Work ability index, 2nd, revised edn. Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
24.
go back to reference Winkler J, Stolzenberg H (2009) Adjustment of the social class index for use in the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS) 2003/2006. Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Winkler J, Stolzenberg H (2009) Adjustment of the social class index for use in the German health interview and examination survey for children and adolescents (KiGGS) 2003/2006. Hochschule Wismar, Wismar
25.
go back to reference Gruber J, Wise D (1998) Social security and retirement: an international comparison. American Econ Rev 88:158–163 Gruber J, Wise D (1998) Social security and retirement: an international comparison. American Econ Rev 88:158–163
26.
go back to reference Schils T (2008) Early retirement in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom: a longitudinal analysis of individual factors and institutional regimes. Eur Soc Rev 24:319–324 Schils T (2008) Early retirement in Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom: a longitudinal analysis of individual factors and institutional regimes. Eur Soc Rev 24:319–324
27.
go back to reference Cohen J (1988) Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
28.
go back to reference Bethge M (2016) Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:273–279CrossRefPubMed Bethge M (2016) Effects of graded return-to-work: a propensity-score-matched analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:273–279CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Torp S, Gudbergsson SB, Dahl AA et al (2011) Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health 39:33–42CrossRefPubMed Torp S, Gudbergsson SB, Dahl AA et al (2011) Social support at work and work changes among cancer survivors in Norway. Scand J Public Health 39:33–42CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Taskila-Brandt T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV et al (2004) The impact of education and occupation on the employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 40:2488-2493 Taskila-Brandt T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV et al (2004) The impact of education and occupation on the employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 40:2488-2493
31.
go back to reference Lindbohm ML, Kuosma E, Taskila T et al (2011) Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study). Psychooncology 20:805–812CrossRefPubMed Lindbohm ML, Kuosma E, Taskila T et al (2011) Cancer as the cause of changes in work situation (a NOCWO study). Psychooncology 20:805–812CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure—results from a prospective study
Authors
Anneke Ullrich
Hilke M. Rath
Ullrich Otto
Christa Kerschgens
Martin Raida
Christa Hagen-Aukamp
Corinna Bergelt
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3790-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine