Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer

Authors: R. Philipp, A. Mehnert, C. Lehmann, K. Oechsle, C. Bokemeyer, A. Krüll, S. Vehling

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This prospective study aimed to determine the extent to which cancer patients experience loss of dignity during primary cancer care (baseline) and at 3-month follow-up and the contribution of positive social support and detrimental social interactions on loss of dignity at follow-up.

Methods

At baseline, we enrolled N = 270 cancer patients (advanced cancer 57 %) undergoing oncological treatment. At follow-up, n = 178 patients (72 %) participated. Patients completed the following questionnaires: sense of dignity item (SDI), physical problem list of the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Illness-Specific Social Support Scale (SSUK), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). We conducted ordinal regression analyses controlling for age, gender, tumor stage, number of physical symptoms, depression, and anxiety.

Results

At baseline, 18 % of the patients experienced moderate to extreme loss of dignity (follow-up 23 %, p = 0.27). Detrimental interactions significantly predicted loss of dignity (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI 1.06–1.90) in a model including positive support (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.82–1.49), depression (OR = 1.55, 95 % CI 0.96–2.51), and anxiety (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI 0.83–1.74). Items in relation to detrimental interactions with significant others such as “made you feel like you couldn’t take care of yourself” (r = 0.29, p < 0.001) and “felt uncomfortable in illness conversations” (r = 0.24, p = 0.002) showed the highest associations with perceived loss of dignity.

Conclusion

Loss of dignity was a frequent problem in our mixed cancer patient sample. Detrimental interactions that weaken the sense of dignity may result from discrepancies with patients’ needs for autonomy and security. Tailoring social support to attachment-related patient needs may help to conserve patients’ sense of dignity.
Literature
13.
go back to reference Street AF, Kissane DW (2001) Constructions of dignity in end-of-life. J Palliat Care 17(2):93–101PubMed Street AF, Kissane DW (2001) Constructions of dignity in end-of-life. J Palliat Care 17(2):93–101PubMed
15.
go back to reference Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM, Deborah Majerovitz S et al (1991) Social support as a double-edged sword: the relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Soc Sci Med 33(7):807–813. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90385-P CrossRefPubMed Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM, Deborah Majerovitz S et al (1991) Social support as a double-edged sword: the relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Soc Sci Med 33(7):807–813. doi:10.​1016/​0277-9536(91)90385-P CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rodin G, Walsh A, Zimmermann C et al (2007) The contribution of attachment security and social support to depressive symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer. Psychooncology 16(12):1080–1091. doi:10.1002/pon.1186 CrossRefPubMed Rodin G, Walsh A, Zimmermann C et al (2007) The contribution of attachment security and social support to depressive symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer. Psychooncology 16(12):1080–1091. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1186 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schroevers MJ, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R (2003) The role of social support and self-esteem in the presence and course of depressive symptoms: a comparison of cancer patients and individuals from the general population. Soc Sci Med 57(2):375–385. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00366-0 CrossRefPubMed Schroevers MJ, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R (2003) The role of social support and self-esteem in the presence and course of depressive symptoms: a comparison of cancer patients and individuals from the general population. Soc Sci Med 57(2):375–385. doi:10.​1016/​S0277-9536(02)00366-0 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wilson KG, Scott JF, Graham ID et al (2000) Attitudes of terminally ill patients toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 160(16):2454–2460CrossRefPubMed Wilson KG, Scott JF, Graham ID et al (2000) Attitudes of terminally ill patients toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med 160(16):2454–2460CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C et al (2006) The German version of the NCCN Distress Thermometer: validation of a screening instrument for assessment of psychosocial distress in cancer patients. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 54(3):213–223. doi:10.1024/1661-4747.54.3.213 CrossRef Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C et al (2006) The German version of the NCCN Distress Thermometer: validation of a screening instrument for assessment of psychosocial distress in cancer patients. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie 54(3):213–223. doi:10.​1024/​1661-4747.​54.​3.​213 CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ramm GC, Hasenbring M (2003) Die deutsche Adaptation des Illness-specific Social Support Scale und ihre teststatistische Überprüfung beim Einsatz an Patienten vor und nach Knochenmarktransplantation [The German adaptation of the Illness-specific Social Support Scale and the test statistical evaluation on the basis of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie 12(1):29–38 Ramm GC, Hasenbring M (2003) Die deutsche Adaptation des Illness-specific Social Support Scale und ihre teststatistische Überprüfung beim Einsatz an Patienten vor und nach Knochenmarktransplantation [The German adaptation of the Illness-specific Social Support Scale and the test statistical evaluation on the basis of patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie 12(1):29–38
22.
go back to reference Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM (1990) Development of a contextual social support measure for use with arthritis population., Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, Seattle Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM (1990) Development of a contextual social support measure for use with arthritis population., Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, Seattle
24.
go back to reference Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S et al (2002) PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten. Manual Komplettversion und Kurzform. Autorisierte deutsche Version des Prime MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), 2nd edn. New York, NY, Pfizer Löwe B, Spitzer RL, Zipfel S et al (2002) PHQ-D Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten. Manual Komplettversion und Kurzform. Autorisierte deutsche Version des Prime MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ), 2nd edn. New York, NY, Pfizer
26.
go back to reference Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S et al (2008) Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical 46(3):266–274. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093 Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S et al (2008) Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical 46(3):266–274. doi:10.​1097/​MLR.​0b013e318160d093​
28.
go back to reference McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J Roy Stat Soc B (Methodological) 42(2):109–142 McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J Roy Stat Soc B (Methodological) 42(2):109–142
Metadata
Title
Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer
Authors
R. Philipp
A. Mehnert
C. Lehmann
K. Oechsle
C. Bokemeyer
A. Krüll
S. Vehling
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3090-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine