Top

Supportive Care in Cancer

Published in:

01-06-2016 | Original Article

How calls from carers, friends and family members of someone affected by cancer differ from those made by people diagnosed with cancer; analysis of 4 years of South Australian Cancer Council Helpline data

Authors: Kate M. Fennell, L. Heckel, C. Wilson, M. Byrnes, P. M. Livingston

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2016

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine how people diagnosed with cancer who call the Cancer Council Helpline in South Australia differ from carers/family/friends (caregivers) who call.

Method

Descriptive, retrospective audit of calls from people who contacted Cancer Council Helpline in South Australia between 16 April 2009 and 16 April 2013 who were diagnosed with cancer (n = 5766) or were the caregivers (n = 5174) of a person with cancer.

Results

Caregivers were more likely to be female (p < 0.001); younger in age (p < 0.001); call regarding cancer that was metastasised/widespread/advanced, terminal or at an unknown stage (p < 0.001) and phone requesting general cancer information or emotional support (p < 0.001). This group was more distressed (p < 0.001) but less likely (p = 0.02) to be offered and/or accept referrals to counselling than people diagnosed with cancer who called. Follow-up care was required by 63.5 % of caregivers and 73.1 % of people with cancer according to distress management guidelines; 8.5 and 15.3 %, respectively, accepted referrals to internal services. The most frequently discussed topic for both groups was emotional/psychological concerns. There were no differences in remoteness of residence or call length between groups.

Conclusions

Caregivers represented different demographic groups than people diagnosed with cancer who called this helpline. The two groups phoned for different issues, at different stages of disease progression, displayed different levels of distress and, therefore, may benefit from services being tailored to meet their unique needs. These results also demonstrate the capacity of helplines to complement other health services and confirm that callers to cancer helplines exhibit high levels of distress.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014) Regional population growth, Australia, 2012–13. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/3218.0∼2012-13∼Main+Features∼Main+Features?OpenDocument#PARALINK3. Accessed 21 November 2014

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2004) Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Rural Health Series, Canberra

Boltong A, Byrnes M, McKiernan S, Quin N, Chapman K (2015) Exploring the preferences, perceptions and satisfaction of people seeking cancer information and support: implications for the cancer council helpline. Aust J Cancer Nurs 16:20–28

Chambers SK, Girgis A, Occhipinti S, Hutchison S, Turner J, Morris B, Dunn J (2012) Psychological distress and unmet supportive care needs in cancer patients and carers who contact cancer helplines. Eur J Cancer Care 21:213–223CrossRef

Doarn CR (2015) Cost Efficiencies in the Healthcare Setting: Telephone Versus Face-to-Face. EBioMedicine 2:1032–1033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Glajchen M (2003) The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. J Support Oncol 2:145–155

Golant M, Haskins NV (2008) “Other cancer survivors”: the impact on family and caregivers. Cancer J 14:420–424CrossRefPubMed

Hardyman R, Hardy P, Brodie J, Stephens R (2005) It’s good to talk: comparison of a telephone helpline and website for cancer information. Patient Educ Couns 57:315–320CrossRefPubMed

Hawkes AL, Hughes KL, Hutchison SD, Chambers SK (2010) Feasibility of brief psychological distress screening by a community-based telephone helpline for cancer patients and carers. BMC Cancer 10. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-10-14

10.

Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hutchison SD, Sargeant H, Morris BA, Hawkes AL, Clutton S, Chambers SK (2011) A community-based approach to cancer counselling for patients and carers: a preliminary study. Psycho-Oncol 20:897–901CrossRef

12.

Hutchison SD, Steginga SK, Dunn J (2006) The tiered model of psychosocial intervention in cancer: a community based approach. Psycho-Oncol 15:541–546CrossRef

13.

Jefford M, Black C, Grogan S, Yeoman G, White V, Akkerman D (2005) Information and support needs of callers to the Cancer Helpline, the Cancer Council Victoria. Eur J Cancer Care 14:113–123CrossRef

14.

Jefford M, Kirke B, Grogan S, Yeoman G, Boyes A (2005) Australia’s cancer helpline: an audit of utility and caller profile. Aust Fam Physician 34:393PubMed

15.

Leahy M, Krishnasamy M, Herschtal A, Bressel M, Dryden T, Tai KH, Foroudi F (2013) Satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow up for low to intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy. A comparative study. Eur J Onc Nurs 17:162–169. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2012.04.003 CrossRef

16.

Lin W-L, Sun J-L, Chang S-C, Wu P-H, Tsai T-C, Huang W-T, Tsao C-J (2013) Development and application of telephone counseling services for care of patients with colorectal cancer. APJCP 15:969–973

17.

Marcus AC, Garrett KM, Kulchak-Rahm A, Barnes D, Dortch W, Juno S (2002) Telephone counseling in psychosocial oncology: a report from the Cancer Information And Counseling Line. Patient Educ Couns 46:267–275CrossRefPubMed

18.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2011) Distress management. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Washington

19.

Papastavrou E, Charalambous A, Tsangari H (2009) Exploring the other side of cancer care: the informal caregiver. Eur J Onc Nurs 13:128–136CrossRef

20.

Psycho-oncology Cooperative Research Group (2012) ARIA lookup tool user guide. School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney

21.

Reid J, Porter S (2011) Utility, caller, and patient profile of a novel chemotherapy telephone helpline service within a regional cancer centre in Northern Ireland. Cancer Nurs 34:E27–E32CrossRefPubMed

22.

Reubsaet A, Lechner L, Vries HD (2006) The Dutch cancer information helpline: more critical patients after 10 years. Patient Educ Couns 63:215–222CrossRefPubMed

23.

Rhee YS, Yun YH, Park S, Shin DO, Lee KM, Yoo HJ, Kim JH, Kim SO, Lee R, Lee YO (2008) Depression in family caregivers of cancer patients: the feeling of burden as a predictor of depression. J Clin Oncol 26:5890–5895CrossRefPubMed

24.

Sardell S, Sharpe G, Ashley S, Guerrero D, Brada M (2000) Evaluation of a nurse-led telephone clinic in the follow-up of patients with malignant glioma. Clin Oncol 12:36–41

25.

Shaw J, Young J, Butow P, Chambers S, O’Brien L, Solomon M (2013) Delivery of telephone-based supportive care to people with cancer: an analysis of cancer helpline operator and cancer nurse communication. Patient Educ Couns 93:444–450CrossRefPubMed

26.

Tamayo GJ, Broxson A, Munsell M, Cohen MZ (2010) Caring for the caregiver. Oncol Nurs Forum 37:E50–E57. doi:10.1188/10.ONF.E50-E57 CrossRefPubMed

27.

van Ryn M, Sanders S, Kahn K, van Houtven C, Griffin JM, Martin M, Atienza AA, Phelan S, Finstad D, Rowland J (2011) Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue? Psycho Oncol 20:44–52CrossRef

28.

Watts KJ, Good LH, McKiernan S, Miller L, O’Connor M, Kane R, Kruger DJ, Adams BR, Musiello T (2015) “Undressing” distress among cancer patients living in urban, regional, and remote locations in Western Australia. Support Care Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2982-4 PubMed

Title: How calls from carers, friends and family members of someone affected by cancer differ from those made by people diagnosed with cancer; analysis of 4 years of South Australian Cancer Council Helpline data
Authors: Kate M. Fennell
L. Heckel
C. Wilson
M. Byrnes
P. M. Livingston
Publication date: 01-06-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3069-y

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Permanent catheters for recurrent ascites—a critical and systematic review of study methodology

Psychosocial and physical outcomes of in- and outpatient rehabilitation in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy

Breast cancer survivors’ perspectives of critical lymphedema self-care support needs

Self-identification and management of hand-foot syndrome (HFS): effect of a structured teaching program on patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy for colon cancer

Winged scapula incidence and upper limb morbidity after surgery for breast cancer with axillary dissection

A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer