Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Article

Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

General practitioners (GPs) are more and more involved in the treatment of cancer patients but feel not informed enough about anticancer treatments and associated side effects. Better communication with treatment centers is needed. We hypothesized that information sheets could improve communication.

Methods

This prospective, multicentric, and interventionist study aimed at implementing and assessing therapeutic sheets describing the side effects of anticancer drugs used for digestive and gynecological cancers and their recommended management. GPs’ phone interviews were done through three successive phases and two independent cohorts. The first phase (T1; 242 GPs with one patient recently treated) listed their expectations, the second (T2; 158 GPs with one patient beginning treatment) assessed the GPs’ opinion regarding the sheets, and the third (T3; responder GPs 4 months after the start of T2) assessed their usefulness in practice.

Results

In T1, 94 % of GPs declared their need of having information sheets, notably for the management of side effects. Thirty-one one-page sheets were created. In T2, 83.5 % gave a favorable opinion about sheets and 80 % envisaged their use in the case of side effect. In T3, 56 % of GPs whose patient had experienced a side effect had used successfully the sheets for its management, and 21 % of patients with side effect were hospitalized. A strong correlation existed between the use of the sheet by GPs and the hospitalization (OR 7.35 in the case of no use vs use).

Conclusion

The guideline sheets represent a simple and low-cost solution to help GPs managing drugs’ side effects and perhaps decrease the rate of unplanned hospitalizations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127(12):2893–2917CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Belot A, Grosclaude P, Bossard N, Jougla E, Benhamou E, Delafosse P et al (2008) Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1980-2005. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 56(3):159–175CrossRefPubMed Belot A, Grosclaude P, Bossard N, Jougla E, Benhamou E, Delafosse P et al (2008) Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1980-2005. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 56(3):159–175CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Mant D, Vessey MP, Fitzpatrick R (1995) Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 12(1):60–65CrossRefPubMed Grunfeld E, Mant D, Vessey MP, Fitzpatrick R (1995) Specialist and general practice views on routine follow-up of breast cancer patients in general practice. Fam Pract 12(1):60–65CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Roorda C, de Bock GH, van der Veen WJ, Lindeman A, Jansen L, van der Meer K (2012) Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer 20(4):705–714PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Roorda C, de Bock GH, van der Veen WJ, Lindeman A, Jansen L, van der Meer K (2012) Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer 20(4):705–714PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M et al (2008) Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 26(14):2272–2277CrossRefPubMed Jefford M, Baravelli C, Dudgeon P, Dabscheck A, Evans M, Moloney M et al (2008) Tailored chemotherapy information faxed to general practitioners improves confidence in managing adverse effects and satisfaction with shared care: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 26(14):2272–2277CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lewis RA, Neal RD, Hendry M, France B, Williams NH, Russell D et al (2009) Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views of cancer follow-up: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 59(564):e248–e259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lewis RA, Neal RD, Hendry M, France B, Williams NH, Russell D et al (2009) Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views of cancer follow-up: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 59(564):e248–e259PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stalhammar J, Holmberg L, Svardsudd K, Tibblin G (1998) Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met? Scand J Prim Health Care 16(3):154–159CrossRefPubMed Stalhammar J, Holmberg L, Svardsudd K, Tibblin G (1998) Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met? Scand J Prim Health Care 16(3):154–159CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO (2000) The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care 18(3):143–148CrossRefPubMed Johansson B, Berglund G, Hoffman K, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO (2000) The role of the general practitioner in cancer care and the effect of an extended information routine. Scand J Prim Health Care 18(3):143–148CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zitzelsberger L, Grunfeld E, Graham ID (2004) Family physicians’ perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control. BMC Fam Pract 5:25, 15544701PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Zitzelsberger L, Grunfeld E, Graham ID (2004) Family physicians’ perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control. BMC Fam Pract 5:25, 15544701PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McConnell D, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (1999) Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care. Br J Cancer 80(3–4):427–437PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McConnell D, Butow PN, Tattersall MH (1999) Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care. Br J Cancer 80(3–4):427–437PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vernant JP, Grunfeld JP (2013) 3rd cancer plan. Rev Prat 63(9):1197–1198PubMed Vernant JP, Grunfeld JP (2013) 3rd cancer plan. Rev Prat 63(9):1197–1198PubMed
12.
go back to reference Demagny L, Holtedahl K, Bachimont J, Thorsen T, Letourmy A, Bungener M (2009) General practitioners’ role in cancer care: a French-Norwegian study. BMC Res Notes 2:200PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Demagny L, Holtedahl K, Bachimont J, Thorsen T, Letourmy A, Bungener M (2009) General practitioners’ role in cancer care: a French-Norwegian study. BMC Res Notes 2:200PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference McAvoy BR (2007) General practitioners and cancer control. Med J Aust 187(2):115–117PubMed McAvoy BR (2007) General practitioners and cancer control. Med J Aust 187(2):115–117PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hamza S, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Bidan JM, Lepage C, Faivre J (2013) Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(12):2727–2733CrossRefPubMed Hamza S, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Bidan JM, Lepage C, Faivre J (2013) Diagnostic yield of a one sample immunochemical test at different cut-off values in an organised screening programme for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 49(12):2727–2733CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Junod B, Zahl PH, Kaplan RM, Olsen J, Greenland S (2011) An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts. BMC Cancer 11:401PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Junod B, Zahl PH, Kaplan RM, Olsen J, Greenland S (2011) An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts. BMC Cancer 11:401PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S (2009) Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 27(20):3338–3345CrossRefPubMed Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S (2009) Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 27(20):3338–3345CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK (2007) Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med 39(7):477–482PubMed Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK (2007) Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients. Fam Med 39(7):477–482PubMed
19.
go back to reference Tardieu E, Thiry-Bour C, Devaux C, Ciocan D, de Carvalho V, Grand M et al (2012) The place of general practitioners in cancer care in Champagne-Ardenne. Bull Cancer 99(5):557–562PubMed Tardieu E, Thiry-Bour C, Devaux C, Ciocan D, de Carvalho V, Grand M et al (2012) The place of general practitioners in cancer care in Champagne-Ardenne. Bull Cancer 99(5):557–562PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA (1996) Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Pract 13(3):264–279CrossRefPubMed Hampson JP, Roberts RI, Morgan DA (1996) Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Pract 13(3):264–279CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference James JA, Harris DJ, Mott MG, Oakhill A (1988) Paediatric oncology information pack for general practitioners. Brit Med J 296(6615):97–98CrossRef James JA, Harris DJ, Mott MG, Oakhill A (1988) Paediatric oncology information pack for general practitioners. Brit Med J 296(6615):97–98CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kousgaard KR, Nielsen JD, Olesen F, Jensen AB (2003) General practitioner assessment of structured oncological information accompanying newly referred cancer patients. Scand J Prim Health Care 21(2):110–114CrossRefPubMed Kousgaard KR, Nielsen JD, Olesen F, Jensen AB (2003) General practitioner assessment of structured oncological information accompanying newly referred cancer patients. Scand J Prim Health Care 21(2):110–114CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Dibble SL, Isreal J, Nussey B, Casey K, Luce J (2003) Delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea in women treated for breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30(2):E40-7CrossRefPubMed Dibble SL, Isreal J, Nussey B, Casey K, Luce J (2003) Delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea in women treated for breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 30(2):E40-7CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Guideline sheets on the side effects of anticancer drugs are useful for general practitioners
Publication date
01-12-2015
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2705-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine