Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Rate and patterns of ICU admission among colorectal cancer patients: a single-center experience

Authors: M. F. Camus, L. Ameye, T. Berghmans, M. Paesmans, J. P. Sculier, A. P. Meert

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate, in colorectal cancer patients, the cause of ICU admission and to find predictors of death during and after hospitalization.

Methods

This is a retrospective study including all patients with colorectal cancer admitted in the ICU of a cancer hospital from January 1st 2003 to December 31 2012.

Results

Among 3721 ICU admissions occurring during the study period, 119 (3.2 %) admissions dealt with colorectal cancer, of whom 89 were eligible and assessable. The main reasons for admission were of metabolic (24 %), hemodynamic (19 %), cardiovascular (18 %), gastrointestinal (16 %), respiratory (13 %), or neurologic (6 %) origin. These complications were due to cancer in 43 %, to the antineoplastic treatment in 25 %, or were unrelated to the cancer or its treatment in 33 %. A quarter of the patients died during hospitalization. Independent predictors of death were the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (with risk of dying increasing by 42 % per unit of SOFA score), fever (with risk of dying multiplied by three per °C), and high values of GOT (with risk of dying multiplied by 1 % per unit increase), while cancer control (i.e., stage progression or not), compliance to the initial cancer treatment plan, and LDH ≤ median levels had prognostic significance for further longer survival after hospital discharge.

Conclusion

This is the first study looking at specific causes for unplanned ICU admission of patients with colorectal cancer. Hospital mortality was influenced by the characteristics of the complication that entailed the ICU admission while cancer characteristics retained their prognostic influence on survival after hospital discharge.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23:2479–2516CrossRefPubMed Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23:2479–2516CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Payne JE, Meyer HJ (1995) The influence of other diseases upon the outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Aust N Z J Surg 65:398–402CrossRefPubMed Payne JE, Meyer HJ (1995) The influence of other diseases upon the outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Aust N Z J Surg 65:398–402CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference McArdle CS, Hole DJ (2004) Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. Br J Surg 91:605–609CrossRefPubMed McArdle CS, Hole DJ (2004) Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. Br J Surg 91:605–609CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bird GT, Farquhar-Smith P, Wigmore T, Potter M, Gruber PC (2012) Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with haematological malignancy admitted to a specialist cancer intensive care unit: a 5 yr study. Br J Anaesth 108:452–459CrossRefPubMed Bird GT, Farquhar-Smith P, Wigmore T, Potter M, Gruber PC (2012) Outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with haematological malignancy admitted to a specialist cancer intensive care unit: a 5 yr study. Br J Anaesth 108:452–459CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Boussat S, El’rini T, Dubiez A, Depierre A, Barale F, Capellier G (2000) Predictive factors of death in primary lung cancer patients on admission to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 26:1811–1836CrossRefPubMed Boussat S, El’rini T, Dubiez A, Depierre A, Barale F, Capellier G (2000) Predictive factors of death in primary lung cancer patients on admission to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 26:1811–1836CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Roques S, Parrot A, Lavole A et al (2009) Six-month prognosis of patients with lung cancer admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 35:2044–2050CrossRefPubMed Roques S, Parrot A, Lavole A et al (2009) Six-month prognosis of patients with lung cancer admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 35:2044–2050CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bos MM, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Dekker JW, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E (2013) Outcomes of intensive care unit admissions after elective cancer surgery. EJSO 39:584–592CrossRefPubMed Bos MM, Bakhshi-Raiez F, Dekker JW, de Keizer NF, de Jonge E (2013) Outcomes of intensive care unit admissions after elective cancer surgery. EJSO 39:584–592CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Haines IE, Zalcberg J, Buchanan JD (1990) Not-for-resuscitation orders in cancer patients principles of decision-making. Med J Aust 153:225–229CrossRefPubMed Haines IE, Zalcberg J, Buchanan JD (1990) Not-for-resuscitation orders in cancer patients principles of decision-making. Med J Aust 153:225–229CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on the European/North American muticenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963CrossRefPubMed Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on the European/North American muticenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kress JP, Christenson J, Pohlmans AS, Linkin DR, Hall JB (1990) Outcomes of critically ill cancer patients in a university hospital setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1957–1961CrossRef Kress JP, Christenson J, Pohlmans AS, Linkin DR, Hall JB (1990) Outcomes of critically ill cancer patients in a university hospital setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1957–1961CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mendoza V, Lee A, Marik PE (2008) The hospital-survival and prognostic factors of patients with solid tumors admitted to an ICU. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 240–243 Mendoza V, Lee A, Marik PE (2008) The hospital-survival and prognostic factors of patients with solid tumors admitted to an ICU. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 240–243
16.
go back to reference Gorham J, Ameye L, Berghmans T, Sculier JP, Meert AP (2013) The lung cancer patient at the emergency department: a three-year retrospective study. Lung Cancer. 203–8 Gorham J, Ameye L, Berghmans T, Sculier JP, Meert AP (2013) The lung cancer patient at the emergency department: a three-year retrospective study. Lung Cancer. 203–8
17.
go back to reference Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP (2004) Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in a intensive care unit than general gravity scores. Support Care Cancer 12:234–239CrossRefPubMed Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP (2004) Is a specific oncological scoring system better at predicting the prognosis of cancer patients admitted for an acute medical complication in a intensive care unit than general gravity scores. Support Care Cancer 12:234–239CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Vallot F, Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Sculier JP (2003) Leucopenia is an independent predictor in cancer patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a prognostic factor analysis in a series of 168 patients. Support Care Cancer 11(4):236–241PubMed Vallot F, Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Sculier JP (2003) Leucopenia is an independent predictor in cancer patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a prognostic factor analysis in a series of 168 patients. Support Care Cancer 11(4):236–241PubMed
19.
go back to reference Meert AP, Berghmans T, Hardy M, Markiewicz E, Sculier JP (2006) Non-invasive ventilation for cancer patients with life-support techniques limitation. Support Care Cancer 14(2):167–171CrossRefPubMed Meert AP, Berghmans T, Hardy M, Markiewicz E, Sculier JP (2006) Non-invasive ventilation for cancer patients with life-support techniques limitation. Support Care Cancer 14(2):167–171CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Berghmans T, Meert AP, Markiewicz E, Sculier JP (2004) Continuous venovenous haemofiltration in cancer patients with renal failure: a single-centre experience. Support Care Cancer 12(5):306–311CrossRefPubMed Berghmans T, Meert AP, Markiewicz E, Sculier JP (2004) Continuous venovenous haemofiltration in cancer patients with renal failure: a single-centre experience. Support Care Cancer 12(5):306–311CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Rate and patterns of ICU admission among colorectal cancer patients: a single-center experience
Authors
M. F. Camus
L. Ameye
T. Berghmans
M. Paesmans
J. P. Sculier
A. P. Meert
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2524-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine