Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Original Article

Minimally invasive palliative procedures in oncology: a review of a multidisciplinary collaboration

Authors: Lucy Chu, Pippa Hawley, Peter Munk, Paul Mallinson, Paul Clarkson

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Minimally invasive palliative procedures (MIPPs) are sometimes considered step 4 of the World Health Organization’s three-step ladder. A case conference has been created at the BC Cancer Agency to facilitate access to MIPPs for advanced cancer patients with severe pain not responding to conventional analgesics. The twice monthly conference discusses referrals for pain control procedures and reviews imaging, with palliative care, musculoskeletal interventional radiology, radiation oncology, medical oncology, and anesthesia experts in attendance.

Study objectives

The aims of this study are: first, to determine the benefit to patients from the procedures recommended by the case conference, and second, to explore the impact of the case conference on clinical decision-making.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic charts of all cancer patients referred to the MIPP case conference between December 20, 2011 and June 25, 2013.

Results

There were 103 referrals, resulting in 69 procedures performed among 63 patients. Over 80 % of procedures provided analgesic benefit. Pain scores fell across all categories post-procedure. Mean worst pain scores fell from 8.1 ± 1.4 to 4.6 ± 2.8 (P < 0.001). Patient function, mobility, and symptoms measured by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System also improved post-procedure. At time of abstract submission, 37/63 (58.7 %) patients had died, and the mean survival post-procedure was 200 days. The documented rate of major adverse events attributable to MIPPs was 2/69 (2.9 %).

Conclusions

MIPPs are valuable treatment options in patients with severe cancer pain despite use of appropriate step 3 WHO ladder medications. The case conference facilitates excellent communication and sharing of expertise, ensuring optimal patient care.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference World Health Organization (1996) Cancer pain relief: with a guide to opioid availability, 2nd edn. WHO, Singapore, 69 p World Health Organization (1996) Cancer pain relief: with a guide to opioid availability, 2nd edn. WHO, Singapore, 69 p
3.
go back to reference Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, Hertel D, Lehmann KA (1995) Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain 63(1):65–76CrossRefPubMed Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, Hertel D, Lehmann KA (1995) Validation of World Health Organization Guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain 63(1):65–76CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schug SA, Zech D, Dörr U (1990) Cancer pain management according to WHO analgesic guidelines. J Pain Symptom Manag 5(1):27–32CrossRef Schug SA, Zech D, Dörr U (1990) Cancer pain management according to WHO analgesic guidelines. J Pain Symptom Manag 5(1):27–32CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meuser T, Pietruck C, Radbruch L, Stute P, Lehmann KA, Grond S (2001) Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93(3):247–257CrossRefPubMed Meuser T, Pietruck C, Radbruch L, Stute P, Lehmann KA, Grond S (2001) Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology. Pain 93(3):247–257CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ventafridda V, Caraceni A, Gamba A (1990) Field-testing of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief: summary report of demonstration projects. In: Foley KM, Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Cancer Pain. Vol 16 of Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. New York: Raven Press. p. 451–64 Ventafridda V, Caraceni A, Gamba A (1990) Field-testing of the WHO guidelines for cancer pain relief: summary report of demonstration projects. In: Foley KM, Bonica JJ, Ventafridda V (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Cancer Pain. Vol 16 of Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. New York: Raven Press. p. 451–64
7.
go back to reference Miguel R (2000) Interventional treatment of cancer pain: the fourth step in the World Health Organization analgesic ladder? Cancer Control 7(2):149–156PubMed Miguel R (2000) Interventional treatment of cancer pain: the fourth step in the World Health Organization analgesic ladder? Cancer Control 7(2):149–156PubMed
8.
go back to reference Krames ES (2004) Cancer pain demands an integrated approach. J Support Oncol 2(6):504–506PubMed Krames ES (2004) Cancer pain demands an integrated approach. J Support Oncol 2(6):504–506PubMed
9.
go back to reference Chew C, Craig L, Edwards R, Moss J, O’Dwyer PJ (2011) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review. Clin Radiol 66(1):63–72CrossRefPubMed Chew C, Craig L, Edwards R, Moss J, O’Dwyer PJ (2011) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in malignancy: a systematic review. Clin Radiol 66(1):63–72CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lane MD, Le HB, Lee S, Young C, Heran MK, Badii M, Clarkson PW, Munk PL (2011) Combination radiofrequency ablation and cementoplasty for palliative treatment of painful neoplastic bone metastasis: experience with 53 treated lesions in 36 patients. Skelet Radiol 40(1):25–32CrossRef Lane MD, Le HB, Lee S, Young C, Heran MK, Badii M, Clarkson PW, Munk PL (2011) Combination radiofrequency ablation and cementoplasty for palliative treatment of painful neoplastic bone metastasis: experience with 53 treated lesions in 36 patients. Skelet Radiol 40(1):25–32CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hawley P, Beddard-Huber E, Grose C, McDonald W, Lobb D, Malysh L (2009) Intrathecal infusions for intractable cancer pain: a qualitative study of the impact on a case series of patients and caregivers. Pain Res Manag 14(5):371–379PubMedCentralPubMed Hawley P, Beddard-Huber E, Grose C, McDonald W, Lobb D, Malysh L (2009) Intrathecal infusions for intractable cancer pain: a qualitative study of the impact on a case series of patients and caregivers. Pain Res Manag 14(5):371–379PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bedard G, Zeng L, Zhang L, Lauzon N, Holden L, Tsao M, Danjoux C, Barnes E, Sahgal A, Poon M, Chow E (2013) Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton symptom assessment system in patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 46(2):192–200CrossRef Bedard G, Zeng L, Zhang L, Lauzon N, Holden L, Tsao M, Danjoux C, Barnes E, Sahgal A, Poon M, Chow E (2013) Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton symptom assessment system in patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 46(2):192–200CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eriksson K, Wikström L, Årestedt K, Fridlund B, Broström A (2014) Numeric rating scale: patients’ perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res 27(1):41–46CrossRefPubMed Eriksson K, Wikström L, Årestedt K, Fridlund B, Broström A (2014) Numeric rating scale: patients’ perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res 27(1):41–46CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, Sola-Martinez MT, Deramond H (1997) Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications. J Neuroradiol 24(1):45–59, FrenchPubMed Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, Sola-Martinez MT, Deramond H (1997) Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications. J Neuroradiol 24(1):45–59, FrenchPubMed
15.
go back to reference Partridge A, Seah D, King T, Leighl NB, Hauke R, Wollins D Von Roenn JH (2014) Developing a service model that integrates palliative care throughout cancer care: the time is now. J Clin Oncol 32 8 Sept [e-published ahead of print at www.jco.org] Partridge A, Seah D, King T, Leighl NB, Hauke R, Wollins D Von Roenn JH (2014) Developing a service model that integrates palliative care throughout cancer care: the time is now. J Clin Oncol 32 8 Sept [e-published ahead of print at www.​jco.​org]
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive palliative procedures in oncology: a review of a multidisciplinary collaboration
Authors
Lucy Chu
Pippa Hawley
Peter Munk
Paul Mallinson
Paul Clarkson
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2509-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 6/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine