Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Feasibility and acceptance of electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes using a handheld computer in patients with advanced cancer in daily oncology practice

Authors: D. Blum, D. Koeberle, A. Omlin, J. Walker, R. Von Moos, W. Mingrone, S. deWolf-Linder, S. Hayoz, S. Kaasa, F. Strasser, K. Ribi

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the feasibility and acceptance of electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes in oncological outpatient clinics using a PALM (handheld computer).

Methods

The assessment of a combination of symptoms and clinical benefit parameters grouped in four pairs was tested in a pilot phase in advanced cancer patients. Based on these experiences, the software E-MOSAIC was developed, consisting of patient-reported symptoms and nutritional intake and objective assessments (weight, weight loss, performance status and medication for pain, fatigue, and cachexia). E-MOSAIC was then tested in four Swiss oncology centers. In order to compare the methods, patients completed the E-MOSAIC as a paper and a PALM version. Preferences of version and completion times were collected. Assessments were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests , and the test-retest reliability was evaluated.

Results

The pilot phase was completed by 22 patients. Most patients and physicians perceived the assessment as useful. Sixty-two patients participated in the feasibility study. Twelve patients reported problems (understanding, optical, tactile), and five patients could not complete the assessment. The median time to complete the PALM-based assessment was 3 min. Forty-nine percent of patients preferred the PALM, 23 % preferred a paper version, and 28 % of patients had no preference. Paper vs. PALM revealed no significant differences in symptoms, but in nutritional intake (p = 0.013). Test-retest (1 h, n = 20) reliability was satisfactory (r = 073–98).

Conclusion

Electronic symptom and clinical benefit monitoring is feasible in oncology outpatient clinics and perceived as useful by patients, oncology nurses, and oncologists. E-MOSAIC is tested in a prospective randomized trial.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abernethy AP, Currow DC (2011) Patient self-reporting in palliative care using information technology: yes, there is hope! Palliat Med 25:673–674PubMedCrossRef Abernethy AP, Currow DC (2011) Patient self-reporting in palliative care using information technology: yes, there is hope! Palliat Med 25:673–674PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Basch E, Iasonos A, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, Fearn P, Speakman J, Farquhar R, Scher HI, McCabe M, Schrag D (2007) Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:5374–5380PubMedCrossRef Basch E, Iasonos A, Barz A, Culkin A, Kris MG, Artz D, Fearn P, Speakman J, Farquhar R, Scher HI, McCabe M, Schrag D (2007) Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:5374–5380PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, Gerber D, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Glimelius B, Bajetta E, Schuller J, Saletti P, Bauer J, Figer A, Pestalozzi BC, Kohne C-H, Mingrone W, Stemmer SM, Tàmas K, Kornek GV, Koeberle D, Herrmann R (2008) Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial–SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol 26:3695–3701PubMedCrossRef Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, Gerber D, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Glimelius B, Bajetta E, Schuller J, Saletti P, Bauer J, Figer A, Pestalozzi BC, Kohne C-H, Mingrone W, Stemmer SM, Tàmas K, Kornek GV, Koeberle D, Herrmann R (2008) Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial–SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol 26:3695–3701PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Fann JR, Austin-Seymour M, Bush N, Karras BT, Lober WB, McCorkle R (2011) Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1029–1035PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Berry DL, Blumenstein BA, Halpenny B, Wolpin S, Fann JR, Austin-Seymour M, Bush N, Karras BT, Lober WB, McCorkle R (2011) Enhancing patient-provider communication with the electronic self-report assessment for cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1029–1035PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Blum D, Koeberle D, Ribi K, Hsu Schmitz SF, Uitger U, Klingbiel D, Strasser F (2012) Electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes associated with cancer: methods of a randomized controlled trial SAKK 95/06 E-MOSAIC. BMC palliative care 11:19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Blum D, Koeberle D, Ribi K, Hsu Schmitz SF, Uitger U, Klingbiel D, Strasser F (2012) Electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes associated with cancer: methods of a randomized controlled trial SAKK 95/06 E-MOSAIC. BMC palliative care 11:19PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 7:6–9PubMed
7.
go back to reference Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 7:513–519CrossRef Buxton J, White M, Osoba D (1998) Patients' experiences using a computerized program with a touch-sensitive video monitor for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab 7:513–519CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chan CW, Tam W, Cheng KK, Chui YY, So WK, Mok T, Wong C, McReynolds J, Berry DL (2011) Piloting electronic self report symptom assessment—cancer (ESRA-C) in Hong Kong: a mixed method approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15:325–334PubMedCrossRef Chan CW, Tam W, Cheng KK, Chui YY, So WK, Mok T, Wong C, McReynolds J, Berry DL (2011) Piloting electronic self report symptom assessment—cancer (ESRA-C) in Hong Kong: a mixed method approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15:325–334PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cox A, Illsley M, Knibb W, Lucas C, O'Driscoll M, Potter C, Flowerday A, Faithfull S (2011) The acceptability of e-technology to monitor and assess patient symptoms following palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Palliat Med 25:675–681PubMedCrossRef Cox A, Illsley M, Knibb W, Lucas C, O'Driscoll M, Potter C, Flowerday A, Faithfull S (2011) The acceptability of e-technology to monitor and assess patient symptoms following palliative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Palliat Med 25:675–681PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cull A, Gould A, House A, Smith A, Strong V, Velikova G, Wright P, Selby P (2001) Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 85:1842–1849PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cull A, Gould A, House A, Smith A, Strong V, Velikova G, Wright P, Selby P (2001) Validating automated screening for psychological distress by means of computer touchscreens for use in routine oncology practice. Br J Cancer 85:1842–1849PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Detmar SB, Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34:1181–1186PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027–3034PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Doyle C, Crump M, Pintilie M, Oza AM (2001) Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:1266–1274PubMed Doyle C, Crump M, Pintilie M, Oza AM (2001) Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:1266–1274PubMed
14.
15.
go back to reference Fisch MJ, Titzer ML, Kristeller JL, Shen J, Loehrer PJ, Jung S-H, Passik SD, Einhorn LH (2003) Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer: the accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being–a Hoosier Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 21:2754–2759PubMedCrossRef Fisch MJ, Titzer ML, Kristeller JL, Shen J, Loehrer PJ, Jung S-H, Passik SD, Einhorn LH (2003) Assessment of quality of life in outpatients with advanced cancer: the accuracy of clinician estimations and the relevance of spiritual well-being–a Hoosier Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 21:2754–2759PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gough IR, Dalgleish LI (1991) What value is given to quality of life assessment by health professionals considering response to palliative chemotherapy for advanced cancer? Cancer 68:220–225PubMedCrossRef Gough IR, Dalgleish LI (1991) What value is given to quality of life assessment by health professionals considering response to palliative chemotherapy for advanced cancer? Cancer 68:220–225PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S (2008) Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 11:322–333PubMedCrossRef Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S (2008) Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 11:322–333PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hjermstad MJ, Lie HC, Caraceni A, Currow DC, Fainsinger RL, Gundersen OE, Haugen DF, Heitzer E, Radbruch L, Stone PC, Strasser F, Kaasa S, Loge JH (2012) Computer-Based symptom assessment is feasible in patients with advanced cancer: results from an International Multicenter Study, the EPCRC-CSA. Journal of pain and symptom management Hjermstad MJ, Lie HC, Caraceni A, Currow DC, Fainsinger RL, Gundersen OE, Haugen DF, Heitzer E, Radbruch L, Stone PC, Strasser F, Kaasa S, Loge JH (2012) Computer-Based symptom assessment is feasible in patients with advanced cancer: results from an International Multicenter Study, the EPCRC-CSA. Journal of pain and symptom management
19.
go back to reference Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Stewart JA, Meharchand JM, Wierzbicki R, Leighl N (2013) Can a computerized format replace a paper form in PRO and HRQL evaluation? Psychometric testing of the computer-assisted LCSS instrument (eLCSS-QL). Support Care Cancer 21:165–172PubMedCrossRef Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Stewart JA, Meharchand JM, Wierzbicki R, Leighl N (2013) Can a computerized format replace a paper form in PRO and HRQL evaluation? Psychometric testing of the computer-assisted LCSS instrument (eLCSS-QL). Support Care Cancer 21:165–172PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaasa S, Loge JH, Fayers P, Caraceni A, Strasser F, Hjermstad MJ, Higginson I, Radbruch L, Haugen DF (2008) Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. J Clin Oncol 26:3867–3873PubMedCrossRef Kaasa S, Loge JH, Fayers P, Caraceni A, Strasser F, Hjermstad MJ, Higginson I, Radbruch L, Haugen DF (2008) Symptom assessment in palliative care: a need for international collaboration. J Clin Oncol 26:3867–3873PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kearney N, Kidd L, Miller M, Sage M, Khorrami J, McGee M, Cassidy J, Niven K, Gray P (2006) Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 14:742–752PubMedCrossRef Kearney N, Kidd L, Miller M, Sage M, Khorrami J, McGee M, Cassidy J, Niven K, Gray P (2006) Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study. Support Care Cancer 14:742–752PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Laugsand EA, Jakobsen G, Kaasa S, Klepstad P (2011) Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe. Support Care Cancer 19:2005–2014PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Laugsand EA, Jakobsen G, Kaasa S, Klepstad P (2011) Inadequate symptom control in advanced cancer patients across Europe. Support Care Cancer 19:2005–2014PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Michael M, Hedley D, Oza A, Feld R, Pintilie M, Goel R, Maroun J, Jolivet J, Fields A, Lee IM, Moore MJ (2002) The palliative benefit of irinotecan in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer: its prospective evaluation by a multicenter Canadian trial. Clin Color Cancer 2:93–101CrossRef Michael M, Hedley D, Oza A, Feld R, Pintilie M, Goel R, Maroun J, Jolivet J, Fields A, Lee IM, Moore MJ (2002) The palliative benefit of irinotecan in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer: its prospective evaluation by a multicenter Canadian trial. Clin Color Cancer 2:93–101CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK (2004) Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:E84–89PubMedCrossRef Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK (2004) Computerized symptom and quality-of-life assessment for patients with cancer part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 31:E84–89PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oliver DR, Demiris G (2004) An assessment of the readiness of hospice organizations to accept technological innovation. J Telemed Telecare 10:170–174PubMedCrossRef Oliver DR, Demiris G (2004) An assessment of the readiness of hospice organizations to accept technological innovation. J Telemed Telecare 10:170–174PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Passik SD, Kirsh KL (2000) The importance of quality-of-life endpoints in clinical trials to the practicing oncologist. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 14:877–886PubMedCrossRef Passik SD, Kirsh KL (2000) The importance of quality-of-life endpoints in clinical trials to the practicing oncologist. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 14:877–886PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ruland CM, Holte HH, Roislien J, Heaven C, Hamilton GA, Kristiansen J, Sandbaek H, Kvaloy SO, Hasund L, Ellison MC (2010) Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:403–410PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ruland CM, Holte HH, Roislien J, Heaven C, Hamilton GA, Kristiansen J, Sandbaek H, Kvaloy SO, Hasund L, Ellison MC (2010) Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17:403–410PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-oncology 9:203–213PubMedCrossRef Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, Speca M, DeGagne T, Olson K, Doll R, Rosberger Z (2000) Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psycho-oncology 9:203–213PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, Selby PJ (2002) Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51–59PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Velikova G, Brown JM, Smith AB, Selby PJ (2002) Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Br J Cancer 86:51–59PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB, Stark D, Perren T, Brown J, Selby P (2001) Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed Velikova G, Wright P, Smith AB, Stark D, Perren T, Brown J, Selby P (2001) Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. J Clin Oncol 19:2064–2073PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wilkie DJ, Judge MK, Berry DL, Dell J, Zong S, Gilespie R (2003) Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 25:213–224CrossRef Wilkie DJ, Judge MK, Berry DL, Dell J, Zong S, Gilespie R (2003) Usability of a computerized PAINReportIt in the general public with pain and people with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manag 25:213–224CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikova G, Watson K, Gould A, Cull A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382PubMedCrossRef Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Johnston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikova G, Watson K, Gould A, Cull A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and acceptance of electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes using a handheld computer in patients with advanced cancer in daily oncology practice
Authors
D. Blum
D. Koeberle
A. Omlin
J. Walker
R. Von Moos
W. Mingrone
S. deWolf-Linder
S. Hayoz
S. Kaasa
F. Strasser
K. Ribi
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2201-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 9/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine