Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2006

01-07-2006 | Original Article

Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study

Authors: N. Kearney, L. Kidd, M. Miller, M. Sage, J. Khorrami, M. McGee, J. Cassidy, K. Niven, P. Gray

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 7/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

Recent changes in cancer service provision mean that many patients spend a limited time in hospital and therefore experience and must cope with and manage treatment-related side effects at home. Information technology can provide innovative solutions in promoting patient care through information provision, enhancing communication, monitoring treatment-related side effects and promoting self-care.

Patients and methods

The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the acceptability of using handheld computers as a symptom assessment and management tool for patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer. A convenience sample of patients (n=18) and health professionals (n=9) at one Scottish cancer centre was recruited. Patients used the handheld computer to record and send daily symptom reports to the cancer centre and receive instant, tailored symptom management advice during two treatment cycles. Both patients’ and health professionals’ perceptions of the handheld computer system were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the project.

Main results

Patients believed the handheld computer had improved their symptom management and felt comfortable in using it. The health professionals also found the handheld computer to be helpful in assessing and managing patients’ symptoms.

Conclusions

This project suggests that a handheld-computer-based symptom management tool is feasible and acceptable to both patients and health professionals in complementing the care of patients receiving chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
Affleck G, Tennen H, Urrows S, Higgins P, Abeles M (1998) Fibromyalgia and women’s pursuit of personal goals: a daily process analysis. Health Psychol 17(1):40–47CrossRefPubMed
2.
Affleck G, Apter A, Tennen H, Reisine S, Barrows E, Willard A, Unger J, ZuWallack R (2000) Mood states associated with transitory changes in asthma symptoms and peak expiratory flow. Psychosom Med 62:61–68PubMed
3.
Aaron LA, Turner JA, Mancl L, Brister H, Sawchuk CN (2005) Electronic diary assessment of pain related variables: is reactivity a problem? J Pain 6(2):107–115CrossRefPubMed
4.
Bader S, Braude R (1998) Patient informatics: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med 73(4):408–411CrossRefPubMed
5.
Berry DL, Trigg LJ, Lober WB, Karras BT, Galligan ML, Austin Seymour M, Martin S (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part I: development and pilot testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E75–E83PubMedCrossRef
6.
Bielli E, Carminati F, La Carpa S, Line M, Brunelli C, Tamburini M (2004) A wireless health outcomes monitoring system (WHOMS): development and filed testing with cancer patients using mobile phones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15(4):7CrossRef
7.
Brown V, Sitzia J, Richardson A, Hughes J, Hannon H, Oakley C (2001) The development of the Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale (C-SAS): a scale for the routine clinical assessment of the symptom experiences of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. Int J Nurs Stud 38:497–510CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bryman A (2001) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9.
Carlson LE, Speca M, Hagen N, Taenzer P (2001) Computerised quality of life screening in a cancer pain clinic. J Palliat Care 17:46–52PubMed
10.
Celler B, Lovell N, Basilakis J (2003) Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease. Med J Aust 179:242–246PubMed
11.
Craddock R, Adams P, Usui W, Mitchell L (1999) An intervention to increase use and effectiveness of self care measures for breast cancer chemotherapy patients. Cancer Nurs 22(4):312–319CrossRefPubMed
12.
Department of Health (2002) Delivering 21st century IT support for the NHS: national strategic programme. Department of Health, London
13.
Department of Health (2005a) Supporting people with long term conditions: an NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration. Department of Health, London
14.
Department of Health (2005b) Self care—a real choice: self care support—a practical option. Department of Health, London
15.
Dodd M (1984) Measuring informational intervention for chemotherapy knowledge and self care behaviour. Res Nurs Health 7:43–50PubMedCrossRef
16.
Dodd M (1988) Efficacy of proactive information on self care in chemotherapy patients. Patient Educ Couns 11:215–225CrossRefPubMed
17.
Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, Faucett J, Froelicher ES, Humphreys J, Lee K, Miaskowski C, Puntillo K, Rankin S, Taylor D (2001) Advancing the science of symptom management. J Adv Nurs 33(5):668–676CrossRefPubMed
18.
Eng T, Gustafson D (1999) Wired for health and well being: the emergence of interactive health communication. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC
19.
Fieschi M (2002) Information technology is changing the way society sees healthcare delivery. Int J Med Inform 66:85–93CrossRefPubMed
20.
Finkelstein J, Hripcsak G, Cabrera M (1998) Telematic system for monitoring of asthma severity in patients’ homes. Medinfo 9(Pt 1):272–276PubMed
21.
Fortner B, Okon T, Schwartzberg L, Tauer K, Houts AC (2003) The cancer care monitor: psychometric testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26(6):1077–1092CrossRefPubMed
22.
Furstenberg CT, Carter JA, Henderson JV, Ahles TA (2002) Formative evaluation of a multimedia programme for patients about the side effects of treatment. Patient Educ Couns 47:57–62CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gaertner J, Elsner F, Pollman-Dahmen K, Radbruch L, Sabatowski R (2004) Electronic pain diary: a randomised crossover study. J Pain Symptom Manage 28(3):259–267CrossRefPubMed
24.
Goldsmith D, McDermott D, Safran C (2004) Improving cancer related symptom management with collaborative healthware. Medinfo 11(Pt 1):217–221PubMed
25.
Goodman J, Syme A, Eisma R (2003) Older adults use of computers: a survey. In: 17th annual human computer interaction (HCI) conference, Bath, 8–12 September 2003
26.
Gustafson D, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin R, Graziano F, Chan C (1999) Impact of a patient-centred, computer based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med 16(1):1–9CrossRefPubMed
27.
Green J, Thorogood N (2004) Qualitative methods for health researchers. Sage, London
28.
Hill WG, Weinert C (2004) An evaluation of an online intervention to provide social support and health education. Comput Inform Nurs 22(5):282–288PubMedCrossRef
29.
Holmes S, Edburn E (1989) Patients’ and nurses’ perceptions of symptom distress in cancer. J Adv Nurs 14:840–846PubMedCrossRef
30.
Horowitz CR, Rein SB, Leventhal H (2004) A story of maladies, misconceptions and mishaps: effective management of heart failure. Soc Sci Med 58(3):631–643CrossRefPubMed
31.
Jamison R, Raymond S, Levine J, Slawsby E, Nedeljkovic S, Katz N (2001) Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain 91:277–285CrossRefPubMed
32.
Kearney N, Miller M, Sermeus W, Hoy D, Vanhaecht K (2000) Multicentre research and the WISECARE experience. J Adv Nurs 3(4):999–1007CrossRef
33.
Kohlmeier L, Mendex M, McDuffie J, Miller M (1997) Computer-assisted self-interviewing: a multimedia approach to dietary assessment. Am J Clin Nutr 65(Suppl 1):1275–1281
34.
Kurtz M, Kurtz J, Given CC, Given B (1996) Concordance of cancer patient and caregiver symptom reports. Cancer Pract 4(4):185–190
35.
Le PP, Kohane IS, Weeks JC (1995) Using a pen-based computer to collect health related quality of life and utilities information. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995:839–843
36.
Lobchuk M, Degner L (2002) Symptom experiences: perceptual accuracy between advanced-stage cancer patients and family caregivers in the home care setting. J Clin Oncol 20(16):3495–3507CrossRefPubMed
37.
Lobchuk M, Kristjanson L, Degner L, Blood P, Sloan JA (1997) Perceptions of symptom distress in lung cancer patients: 1. Congruence between patients and family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage 14(3):136–146CrossRefPubMed
38.
McCaughan E, Thompson K (2000) Information needs of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at a day-case unit in Northern Ireland. J Clin Nurs 9:851–858CrossRef
39.
McGee M, Gray P (2005) A handheld chemotherapy symptom management system: results from a preliminary outpatient field trial. J Health Inform 11(4):243–258CrossRef
40.
Miaskowski C, Dodd M, West C, Paul S, Schumacher K, Tripathy P, Koo P (2004) A randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of a self care intervention to improve cancer pain management. J Clin Oncol 22(9):1713–1720CrossRefPubMed
41.
Mooney KH, Beck SL, Friedman RH, Farzanfar R (2002) Telephone linked care for cancer symptom monitoring: a pilot study. Cancer Pract 10(3):147–154CrossRefPubMed
42.
Mullen KH, Berry DL, Zierler BK (2004) Computerised symptom and quality of life assessment for patients with cancer Part II: acceptability and usability. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):E84–E89PubMedCrossRef
43.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on cancer services. Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
44.
Neville R, Greene A, McLeod J, Tracy A, Surie J (2002) Letters: mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 325:600CrossRefPubMed
45.
Ralston J, Revere D, Robins L, Goldberg H (2004) Patients’ experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ 328:1159–1162CrossRefPubMed
46.
Ream E, Richardson A (1996) The role of information in patients’ adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 5(3):132–138CrossRef
47.
Rhodes VA, Johnson MH, McDaniel RW (1995) Nausea, vomiting and retching: the management of symptom experience. Semin Oncol Nurs 11(4):256–265CrossRefPubMed
48.
Ropka ME, Guterbock T, Krebs L, Murphy-Ende K, Stetz K, Summers B, Bissonette E, Given B, Mallory G (2000) Year 2000 oncology nursing society research priorities survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(3):481–491CrossRef
49.
Rosenfalck A, Bendtson I (1993) The DIVA system: a computerised diary used in young, type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab 19:25–29
50.
Scottish Executive (2003) Partnership for care. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh
51.
Scottish Executive Health Department (2005) NHS framework for service change in Scotland. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh
52.
Schwartz J, Stone A (1998) Strategies for analysing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychol 17:6–16CrossRefPubMed
53.
Stone A, Shiffman S, Schwartz J, Broderick J, Hufford M (2002) Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. BMJ 324:1193–1194CrossRefPubMed
54.
Stoop AP, van’t Riet A, Berg M (2004) Using information technology for patients education: realizing surplus value? Patient Educ Couns 54:187–195CrossRefPubMed
55.
Taylor PP (2005) Use of handheld devices in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 17(1):45–50CrossRefPubMed
56.
Tiplady B, Jamieson A, Crompton G (2000) Use of pen-based electronic diaries in an international clinical trial of asthma. Drug Inform J 34(1):129–136
57.
VanDenKerkhof D, Goldstein D, Lane J, Rimmer M, Van Dijk J (2003) Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth 50(4):368–375PubMedCrossRef
58.
Velikova G, Wright E, Smith A, Cull A, Gould A, Forman D, Perren T, Stead M, Brown J, Selby P (1999) Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 17(3):998–1007PubMed
59.
Wright EP, Selby PJ, Crawford M, Gillibrand A, Jonston C, Perren TJ, Rush R, Smith A, Velikov G, Watson K, Gould A, Gill A (2003) Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 21:374–382CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study
Authors
N. Kearney
L. Kidd
M. Miller
M. Sage
J. Khorrami
M. McGee
J. Cassidy
K. Niven
P. Gray
Publication date
01-07-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 7/2006
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0002-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2006

Supportive Care in Cancer 7/2006 Go to the issue

Original Article

Causes of fever in cancer patients (prospective study over 477 episodes)

Review Article

A meta-analysis of exercise interventions among people treated for cancer

Special Article

Early satiety in cancer patients: a common and important but underrecognized symptom

Original Article

Exercise and side effects among 749 patients during and after treatment for cancer: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program Study

Short Communication

Advocacy skills training for young adult cancer survivors: the Young Adult Survivors Conference at Camp Māk-a-Dream

Forthcoming Meetings

Forthcoming Meetings
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits