Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2012

Open Access 01-01-2012 | Original Article

A pan-European survey of research in end-of-life cancer care

Authors: Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Claudia Bausewein, Irene J. Higginson, Richard Harding, Jan Henrik Rosland, Stein Kaasa, on behalf of project PRISMA

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To date, there is no coordinated strategy for end-of-life (EOL) cancer care research in Europe. The PRISMA (Reflecting the Positive Diversities of European Priorities for Research and Measurement in End-of-life Care) project is aiming to develop a programme integrating research and measurement in EOL care. This survey aimed to map and describe present EOL cancer care research in Europe and to identify priorities and barriers.

Material and methods

A questionnaire of 62 questions was developed and 201 researchers in 41 European countries were invited to complete it online in May 2009. An open invitation to participate was posted on the internet.

Results

Invited contacts in 36 countries sent 127 replies; eight additional responses came through websites. A total of 127 responses were eligible for analysis. Respondents were 69 male and 58 female, mean age 49 (28–74) years; 85% of the scientific team leaders were physicians. Seventy-one of 127 research groups were located in a teaching hospital or cancer centre. Forty-five percent of the groups had only one to five members and 28% six to ten members. Sixty-three of 92 groups reported specific funding for EOL care research. Seventy-five percent of the groups had published papers in journals with impact factor ≤5 in the last 3 years; 8% had published in journals with impact factor >10. Forty-four out of 90 groups reported at least one completed Ph.D. in the last 3 years. The most frequently reported active research areas were pain, assessment and measurement tools, and last days of life and quality of death. Very similar areas—last days of life and quality of death, pain, fatigue and cachexia, and assessment and measurement tools—were ranked as the most important research priorities. The most important research barriers were lack of funding, lack of time, and insufficient knowledge/expertise.

Conclusions

Most research groups in EOL care are small. The few large groups (14%) had almost half of the reported publications, and more than half of the current Ph.D. students. There is a lack of a common strategy and coordination in EOL cancer care research and a great need for international collaboration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization/UICC (2003) Global action against cancer. World Health Organization/UICC, Geneva World Health Organization/UICC (2003) Global action against cancer. World Health Organization/UICC, Geneva
2.
go back to reference Higginson IJ, Costantini M (2008) Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer 44:1414–1424PubMedCrossRef Higginson IJ, Costantini M (2008) Dying with cancer, living well with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer 44:1414–1424PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaasa S, Radbruch L (2008) Palliative care research – priorities and the way forward. Eur J Cancer 44:1175–1179PubMedCrossRef Kaasa S, Radbruch L (2008) Palliative care research – priorities and the way forward. Eur J Cancer 44:1175–1179PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shipman C, Gysels M, White P, Worth A, Murray SA, Barclay S, Forrest S, Shepherd J, Dale J, Dewar S, Peters M, White S, Richardson A, Lorenz K, Koffman J, Higginson IJ (2008) Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ 337:848–851CrossRef Shipman C, Gysels M, White P, Worth A, Murray SA, Barclay S, Forrest S, Shepherd J, Dale J, Dewar S, Peters M, White S, Richardson A, Lorenz K, Koffman J, Higginson IJ (2008) Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups. BMJ 337:848–851CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Palliative Medicine (2006) Special issue on palliative care research methodology. Palliat Med 20:725–871CrossRef Palliative Medicine (2006) Special issue on palliative care research methodology. Palliat Med 20:725–871CrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Kaasa S, De Conno F (2001) Palliative care research. Eur J Cancer 37:153–159CrossRef Kaasa S, De Conno F (2001) Palliative care research. Eur J Cancer 37:153–159CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Ferketich SL, Frame PS, Harris JJ, Hendricks CB, Levin B, Link MP, Lustig C, McLaughlin J, Ried LD, Turrisi AT 3 rd, Unutzer J, Vernon SW (2003) National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15–17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1110–1117PubMedCrossRef Patrick DL, Ferketich SL, Frame PS, Harris JJ, Hendricks CB, Levin B, Link MP, Lustig C, McLaughlin J, Ried LD, Turrisi AT 3 rd, Unutzer J, Vernon SW (2003) National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15–17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1110–1117PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fainsinger RL (2008) Global warming in the palliative care research environment: adapting to change. Palliat Med 22:328–335PubMedCrossRef Fainsinger RL (2008) Global warming in the palliative care research environment: adapting to change. Palliat Med 22:328–335PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harding R, Higginson IJ (2010) PRISMA: a pan-European co-ordinating action to advance the science in end-of-life cancer care. Eur J Cancer 46:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef Harding R, Higginson IJ (2010) PRISMA: a pan-European co-ordinating action to advance the science in end-of-life cancer care. Eur J Cancer 46:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) (2004) Supportive and palliative care research in the UK: report of the NCRI Strategic Planning Group on Supportive and Palliative Care. NCRI, London. pp. 1–64. National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) (2004) Supportive and palliative care research in the UK: report of the NCRI Strategic Planning Group on Supportive and Palliative Care. NCRI, London. pp. 1–64.
16.
go back to reference Wenk R, De Lima L, Eisenchlas J (2008) Palliative care research in Latin America: results of a survey within the scope of the Declaration of Venice. J Palliat Med 11:717–722PubMedCrossRef Wenk R, De Lima L, Eisenchlas J (2008) Palliative care research in Latin America: results of a survey within the scope of the Declaration of Venice. J Palliat Med 11:717–722PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hardy J, Dingle K, Beebe H, Yates P (2005) Creating a palliative research network in Queensland, Australia—is this the answer? Prog Palliat Care 13:277–281CrossRef Hardy J, Dingle K, Beebe H, Yates P (2005) Creating a palliative research network in Queensland, Australia—is this the answer? Prog Palliat Care 13:277–281CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wright M, Wood J, Lynch T, Clark D (2008) Mapping levels of palliative care development: a global view. J Pain Symptom Manage 35:469–485PubMedCrossRef Wright M, Wood J, Lynch T, Clark D (2008) Mapping levels of palliative care development: a global view. J Pain Symptom Manage 35:469–485PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Loge JH (2006) Methodological and structural challenges in palliative care research: how have we fared in the last decades? Palliat Med 20:727–734PubMedCrossRef Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Loge JH (2006) Methodological and structural challenges in palliative care research: how have we fared in the last decades? Palliat Med 20:727–734PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Payne SA, Turner JM (2008) Research methodologies in palliative care: a bibliometric analysis. Palliat Med 22:336–342PubMedCrossRef Payne SA, Turner JM (2008) Research methodologies in palliative care: a bibliometric analysis. Palliat Med 22:336–342PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Binswanger J, Inauen R, Strasser F (2006) Barriers to Palliative Care (PC) research. Palliat Med 20: abstr # 467 Binswanger J, Inauen R, Strasser F (2006) Barriers to Palliative Care (PC) research. Palliat Med 20: abstr # 467
25.
go back to reference Hagen NA, Addington-Hall J, Sharpe M, Richardson A, Cleeland CS (2006) The Birmingham International Workshop on supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care research. Cancer 107:874–881PubMedCrossRef Hagen NA, Addington-Hall J, Sharpe M, Richardson A, Cleeland CS (2006) The Birmingham International Workshop on supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care research. Cancer 107:874–881PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sigurdardottir KR, Haugen DF, van der Rijt CC, Sjogren P, Harding R, Higginson IJ, Kaasa S (2010) Clinical priorities, barriers and solutions in end-of-life cancer care research across Europe. Report from a workshop. Eur J Cancer 46:1815–1822PubMedCrossRef Sigurdardottir KR, Haugen DF, van der Rijt CC, Sjogren P, Harding R, Higginson IJ, Kaasa S (2010) Clinical priorities, barriers and solutions in end-of-life cancer care research across Europe. Report from a workshop. Eur J Cancer 46:1815–1822PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A pan-European survey of research in end-of-life cancer care
Authors
Katrin Ruth Sigurdardottir
Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
Claudia Bausewein
Irene J. Higginson
Richard Harding
Jan Henrik Rosland
Stein Kaasa
on behalf of project PRISMA
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1048-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine