Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Original Article

Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC® questionnaire

Authors: Ulrich R. Kleeberg, Petra Feyer, Wolfram Günther, Monika Behrens

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Study objectives

To examine how outpatient cancer patients assess their cancer care in private oncology practices and day hospitals, and to identify the extent to which staff meet the expectations of their patients.

Setting

Private practices (n = 41) and day hospitals (n = 8) in Germany, including 16 “repeater” practices who had already participated in the 2002 Patient Satisfaction and Quality in Oncological Care (PASQOC)® survey.

Participants

n = 4,615 patients with cancer. Diagnoses: 25% breast cancer, 21% colorectal cancer, 12% haematologic malignancies, 11% lymphomas; mean age 63.5 years; 57% female; n = 1,639 patients from repeater practices.

Measurements

The 2004 PASQOC® questionnaire contained 63 problem-oriented items which covered 15 different dimensions of care. Practice staff invited their patients to participate and surveys were mailed to all sampled patients. For statistical analysis, the problem frequency (PF) was calculated for each item.

Results

Of 5,600 patients who received the questionnaire, 4,615 replied (response rate: 82%). The best results were obtained for the dimensions “further support in daily life” (3% PF), “nurses” (5% PF), and “physician-patient-relationship” (8% PF). Potential for improvement was most pronounced for “handling of side effects” (39% PF), “partnership and shared decision making” (30% PF), “side effects” (30% PF) and “communication with other patients” (26% PF). Considerable differences in PFs between practices were observed. Mean results from the 16 repeater practices revealed only few changes compared to the 2002 PASQOC® survey, although some practices had greatly improved their performance.

Conclusions

The PASQOC® questionnaire identified strengths and weaknesses of outpatient care for cancer patients. By providing a comparison with other practices, PASQOC® can help staff of individual practices to improve their performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chisholm A, Askham J (2006) What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients’ feedback on their doctor. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford Chisholm A, Askham J (2006) What do you think of your doctor? A review of questionnaires for gathering patients’ feedback on their doctor. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford
2.
go back to reference Barlesi F, Chabert-Greillier L, Loundou A, Simeoni MC, Greillier L, Doddoli C et al (2006) Validation of the French version of the Princess Margaret hospital patient satisfaction with their doctor questionnaire. Rev Mal Respir 23(3 Pt 1):227–236PubMed Barlesi F, Chabert-Greillier L, Loundou A, Simeoni MC, Greillier L, Doddoli C et al (2006) Validation of the French version of the Princess Margaret hospital patient satisfaction with their doctor questionnaire. Rev Mal Respir 23(3 Pt 1):227–236PubMed
3.
go back to reference Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R (2001) Feedback of patients’ evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. Qual Health Care 10(4):224–228PubMedCrossRef Vingerhoets E, Wensing M, Grol R (2001) Feedback of patients’ evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial. Qual Health Care 10(4):224–228PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wensing M, Vingerhoets E, Grol R (2003) Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement. Patient Educ Couns 51(2):149–153 OctPubMedCrossRef Wensing M, Vingerhoets E, Grol R (2003) Feedback based on patient evaluations: a tool for quality improvement. Patient Educ Couns 51(2):149–153 OctPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rao M, Clarke A, Sanderson C, Hammersley R (2006) Patients’ own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study. BMJ 1;333(7557):19CrossRef Rao M, Clarke A, Sanderson C, Hammersley R (2006) Patients’ own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study. BMJ 1;333(7557):19CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cleary PD (2006) The increasing importance of patient surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 8(4):212CrossRef Cleary PD (2006) The increasing importance of patient surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 8(4):212CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sen S, Fawson P, Cherrington G, Douglas K, Friedman N, Maljanian R et al (2005) Patient satisfaction measurement in the disease management industry. Dis Manag 8(5):288–300PubMedCrossRef Sen S, Fawson P, Cherrington G, Douglas K, Friedman N, Maljanian R et al (2005) Patient satisfaction measurement in the disease management industry. Dis Manag 8(5):288–300PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference National Research Corporation (2003) Development and validation of the picker ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada, Jul 11. National Research Corporation, Lincoln National Research Corporation (2003) Development and validation of the picker ambulatory Oncology Survey Instrument in Canada, Jul 11. National Research Corporation, Lincoln
9.
go back to reference Kleeberg UR, Tews JT, Ruprecht T, Hoing M, Kuhlmann A, Runge C (2005) Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC study. Support Care Cancer 13(5):303–310PubMedCrossRef Kleeberg UR, Tews JT, Ruprecht T, Hoing M, Kuhlmann A, Runge C (2005) Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC study. Support Care Cancer 13(5):303–310PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coulter A (2006) Can patients assess the quality of health care. BMJ 1;333(7557):1–2CrossRef Coulter A (2006) Can patients assess the quality of health care. BMJ 1;333(7557):1–2CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gesell SB, Gregory N (2004) Identifying priority actions for improving patient satisfaction with outpatient cancer care. J Nurs Care Qual 19(3):226–233PubMed Gesell SB, Gregory N (2004) Identifying priority actions for improving patient satisfaction with outpatient cancer care. J Nurs Care Qual 19(3):226–233PubMed
12.
go back to reference Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U (2005) Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27(2):96–103PubMedCrossRef Liekweg A, Eckhardt M, Taylor SC, Erdfelder E, Jaehde U (2005) Psychometric assessment and application of a questionnaire measuring patient: satisfaction with information on cancer treatment. Pharm World Sci 27(2):96–103PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sandoval G, Brown AD, Sullivan T (2006) Factors that influence cancer patients’ overall perceptions of the quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 18:226–274CrossRef Sandoval G, Brown AD, Sullivan T (2006) Factors that influence cancer patients’ overall perceptions of the quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 18:226–274CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92(6):832–836PubMed Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V (1980) Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92(6):832–836PubMed
15.
go back to reference Eide H, Graugaard P, Holgersen K, Finset A (2003) Physician communication in different phases of a consultation at an oncology outpatient clinic related to patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):259–266PubMedCrossRef Eide H, Graugaard P, Holgersen K, Finset A (2003) Physician communication in different phases of a consultation at an oncology outpatient clinic related to patient satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns 51(3):259–266PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kravitz RL (2001) Measuring patients’ expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med 1;134(9 Pt 2):881–888 Kravitz RL (2001) Measuring patients’ expectations and requests. Ann Intern Med 1;134(9 Pt 2):881–888
17.
go back to reference Barr DA, Vergun P (2000) Using a new method of gathering patient satisfaction data to assess the effects of organizational factors on primary care quality. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(12):713–723PubMed Barr DA, Vergun P (2000) Using a new method of gathering patient satisfaction data to assess the effects of organizational factors on primary care quality. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 26(12):713–723PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bergenmar M, Nylen U, Lidbrink E, Bergh J, Brandberg Y (2006) Improvements in patient satisfaction at an outpatient clinic for patients with breast cancer. Acta Oncol 45(5):550–558PubMedCrossRef Bergenmar M, Nylen U, Lidbrink E, Bergh J, Brandberg Y (2006) Improvements in patient satisfaction at an outpatient clinic for patients with breast cancer. Acta Oncol 45(5):550–558PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC® questionnaire
Authors
Ulrich R. Kleeberg
Petra Feyer
Wolfram Günther
Monika Behrens
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0362-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine