Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2005

01-05-2005 | Original Article

Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC* study

Authors: U. R. Kleeberg, J.-T. Tews, T. Ruprecht, M. Höing, A. Kuhlmann, C. Runge

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Satisfaction with care and quality of life (QoL) are indicative of the quality of care of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to lay a cornerstone for patient-centred quality management by assessing the current status of satisfaction with care and QoL among oncological outpatients in Germany, and by identifying the key factors that determine a patient’s willingness to recommend a medical facility.

Patients and methods

A self-constructed and validated patient satisfaction questionnaire plus the SF-36 were distributed to a random sample of 3384 cancer patients who presented at 24 investigators’ offices nationwide within a defined recruiting period and who met the inclusion criteria. The return rate was 81.9% (n=2772). A total of 2659 (78.6%) questionnaires were evaluable. The most common cancer types were breast (22.9%) and intestine (19.8%).

Results

Overall satisfaction was high, but specific reporting questions revealed many areas for improvement such as shared decision making, doctor-patient communication and organization of care. QoL was significantly impaired in many domains. Patient-provider relationship, facility setting and information on diagnosis and treatment options are major determinants of a patient’s willingness to recommend a facility to a friend or relative if needed.

Conclusions

This multicentre study focusing on patient perspectives highlights that, although the overall degree of satisfaction was quite high, there are numerous areas for improvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Behrend SW (1994) Documentation in the ambulatory setting. Semin Oncol Nurs 10:264–280PubMed Behrend SW (1994) Documentation in the ambulatory setting. Semin Oncol Nurs 10:264–280PubMed
2.
go back to reference Biermann CW, Höing M, Kuhlmann A, Emmermann A, Tews JT (2000) Assessment of satisfaction with care and quality of life for cancer patients. Ann Oncol 11 [Suppl 4]:145 Biermann CW, Höing M, Kuhlmann A, Emmermann A, Tews JT (2000) Assessment of satisfaction with care and quality of life for cancer patients. Ann Oncol 11 [Suppl 4]:145
3.
go back to reference Blitzer EM, Dierks ML (1995) Entwicklung eines Klassifikationssystems patientenseitiger Qualitätskriterien medizinischer Versorgung – ZAP-Class. Gesundheitswesen 57:562–563 Blitzer EM, Dierks ML (1995) Entwicklung eines Klassifikationssystems patientenseitiger Qualitätskriterien medizinischer Versorgung – ZAP-Class. Gesundheitswesen 57:562–563
4.
go back to reference Brédart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C (1998) A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 6:518–523CrossRefPubMed Brédart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C (1998) A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 6:518–523CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bullinger M (1990) Lebensqualität: Ein neues Bewertungskriterium für den Therapieerfolg. In: Pöppel E, Bullinger M (eds) Medizinische Psychologie. VCH, Weinheim Bullinger M (1990) Lebensqualität: Ein neues Bewertungskriterium für den Therapieerfolg. In: Pöppel E, Bullinger M (eds) Medizinische Psychologie. VCH, Weinheim
6.
go back to reference Cleary PD (1999) The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ 319:720–721PubMed Cleary PD (1999) The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ 319:720–721PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S (1997) Health care quality—incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA 278:1608–1612PubMed Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S (1997) Health care quality—incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA 278:1608–1612PubMed
8.
go back to reference Cooley ME, Lin EM, Hunter SW (1994) The ambulatory oncology nurse’s role. Semin Oncol Nurs 10:245–253PubMed Cooley ME, Lin EM, Hunter SW (1994) The ambulatory oncology nurse’s role. Semin Oncol Nurs 10:245–253PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dierks ML, Bitzer EM (1998) Die Patientenperspektive im Qualitätsmanagement-Fokusgruppen-Diskussionen als qualitatives Erhebungsinstrument. In: Ruprecht TM (ed) Experten fragen—Patienten antworten. Asgard, Sankt Augustin Dierks ML, Bitzer EM (1998) Die Patientenperspektive im Qualitätsmanagement-Fokusgruppen-Diskussionen als qualitatives Erhebungsinstrument. In: Ruprecht TM (ed) Experten fragen—Patienten antworten. Asgard, Sankt Augustin
10.
go back to reference Donabedian A (1980) Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring—the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor Donabedian A (1980) Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring—the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor
11.
go back to reference Duff L, Harvey G, Handa U, Kitson A (1995) Quality Improvement of nursing care in hospitals in India: the dynamic approach. Int J Qual Health Care 7:143–151CrossRefPubMed Duff L, Harvey G, Handa U, Kitson A (1995) Quality Improvement of nursing care in hospitals in India: the dynamic approach. Int J Qual Health Care 7:143–151CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S (1995) No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology 4:197–202PubMed Fallowfield L, Ford S, Lewis S (1995) No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer. Psychooncology 4:197–202PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ford LG (1989) Therapy: state-of-the-art assessment of quality—the National Cancer Institute perspective. Cancer S64:219–222 Ford LG (1989) Therapy: state-of-the-art assessment of quality—the National Cancer Institute perspective. Cancer S64:219–222
14.
go back to reference Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (1990) Primer on indicator development and application. Measuring quality in healthcare. JCAHO, Oakbrook Terrace, IL Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (1990) Primer on indicator development and application. Measuring quality in healthcare. JCAHO, Oakbrook Terrace, IL
15.
go back to reference Klebert A, Schrader E, Straub WG (1987) Kurzmoderation: Anwendung der Moderationsmethode in Betrieb, Schule und Hochschule, Kirche und Politik, Sozialbereich und Familie bei Besprechungen und Präsentationen. Windmühle, Hamburg Klebert A, Schrader E, Straub WG (1987) Kurzmoderation: Anwendung der Moderationsmethode in Betrieb, Schule und Hochschule, Kirche und Politik, Sozialbereich und Familie bei Besprechungen und Präsentationen. Windmühle, Hamburg
16.
go back to reference Kleeberg UR (1985) Die Rolle des Onkologen bei der psychischen Betreuung seiner Patienten. Hamburger Ärzteblatt 39:90–94 Kleeberg UR (1985) Die Rolle des Onkologen bei der psychischen Betreuung seiner Patienten. Hamburger Ärzteblatt 39:90–94
17.
go back to reference Kleeberg UR (1998) Hoffnung erhalten beim unheilbar Krebskranken. Med Klin 93:322–327PubMed Kleeberg UR (1998) Hoffnung erhalten beim unheilbar Krebskranken. Med Klin 93:322–327PubMed
18.
go back to reference Koch U, Weis J (1998) Krankheitsbewältigung bei Krebs und Möglichkeiten der Unterstützung. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart Koch U, Weis J (1998) Krankheitsbewältigung bei Krebs und Möglichkeiten der Unterstützung. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart
19.
go back to reference Levine MA, Birnbaum HA (1998) Integrated health management—the patient-centered future of demand management. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 3:11–22 Levine MA, Birnbaum HA (1998) Integrated health management—the patient-centered future of demand management. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 3:11–22
20.
go back to reference Macnee CL, Penchansky R (1994) Targeting ambulatory care cases for risk management and quality management. Inquiry 31:66–75PubMed Macnee CL, Penchansky R (1994) Targeting ambulatory care cases for risk management and quality management. Inquiry 31:66–75PubMed
21.
go back to reference Marder RJ (1991) Measuring the quality of care for the cancer patient. Cancer S67:1753–1758 Marder RJ (1991) Measuring the quality of care for the cancer patient. Cancer S67:1753–1758
22.
go back to reference Quabeck K, Schaefers M (1997) Möglichkeiten der ambulanten hämatologisch-onkologischen Diagnostik und Therapie. Der Onkologe S1:33–37 Quabeck K, Schaefers M (1997) Möglichkeiten der ambulanten hämatologisch-onkologischen Diagnostik und Therapie. Der Onkologe S1:33–37
23.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N (1998) Patient satisfaction with cancer chemotherapy nursing: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 35:1–12 Sitzia J, Wood N (1998) Patient satisfaction with cancer chemotherapy nursing: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 35:1–12
24.
go back to reference Thomas LH, MacMillan J, McToll E, et al (1995) Obtaining patients’ views of nursing care to inform the development of a patient satisfaction scale. Int J Qual Health Care 7:153–163CrossRefPubMed Thomas LH, MacMillan J, McToll E, et al (1995) Obtaining patients’ views of nursing care to inform the development of a patient satisfaction scale. Int J Qual Health Care 7:153–163CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Treurniet HF, Essink-Bot ML, Mackenbach JP, van der Maas PJ (1997) Health-related quality of life: an indicator of quality of care? Qual Life Res 6:363–369CrossRefPubMed Treurniet HF, Essink-Bot ML, Mackenbach JP, van der Maas PJ (1997) Health-related quality of life: an indicator of quality of care? Qual Life Res 6:363–369CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Volmer T (1996) Lebensqualität und Qualität in der Medizin: Ökonomische Bedeutung und Nutzen eines neuen Beurteilungskriteriums. In: Petermann F (ed) Lebensqualität und chronische Krankheit. Dustri, München Volmer T (1996) Lebensqualität und Qualität in der Medizin: Ökonomische Bedeutung und Nutzen eines neuen Beurteilungskriteriums. In: Petermann F (ed) Lebensqualität und chronische Krankheit. Dustri, München
27.
go back to reference Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al (1993) SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al (1993) SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA
28.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’ s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’ s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA
29.
go back to reference Wiggers JH, Donovan KO, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW (1990) Cancer patient satisfaction with care. Cancer 66:610–616PubMed Wiggers JH, Donovan KO, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW (1990) Cancer patient satisfaction with care. Cancer 66:610–616PubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC* study
Authors
U. R. Kleeberg
J.-T. Tews
T. Ruprecht
M. Höing
A. Kuhlmann
C. Runge
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-004-0727-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 5/2005 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine