Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy

Authors: E. De Cock, J. Hutton, P. Canney, J. J. Body, P. Barrett-Lee, M. P. Neary, G. Lewis

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ibandronate is the first third-generation bisphosphonate to have both oral and intravenous (i.v.) efficacy. An incremental cost-effectiveness model compared oral ibandronate with i.v. zoledronic acid and i.v. generic pamidronate in female breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease, undergoing i.v. chemotherapy.

Methods

A global economic model was adapted to the UK National Health Service (NHS), with primary outcomes of direct healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Efficacy, measured as relative risk reduction of skeletal-related events (SREs), was obtained from clinical trials. Resource use data for i.v. bisphosphonates and the cost of managing SREs were obtained from published studies. Hospital management and SRE treatment costs were taken from unit cost databases. Monthly drug acquisition costs were obtained from the British National Formulary. Utility scores were applied to time with/without an SRE to adjust survival for quality of life. Model design and inputs were validated through expert UK clinician review.

Results

Total cost, including drug acquisition, was £386 less per patient with oral ibandronate vs. i.v. zoledronic acid and £224 less vs. i.v. generic pamidronate. Oral ibandronate gained 0.019 and 0.02 QALYs vs. i.v. zoledronic acid and i.v. pamidronate, respectively, making it the economically dominant option. At a threshold of £30,000 per QALY, oral ibandronate was cost-effective vs. zoledronic acid in 85% of simulations and vs. pamidronate in 79%.

Conclusions

Oral ibandronate is a cost-effective treatment for metastatic bone disease from breast cancer due to reduced SREs, bone pain, and cost savings from avoidance of resource use commonly associated with bisphosphonate infusions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coleman RE (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80(8 Suppl):1588–1594PubMed Coleman RE (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80(8 Suppl):1588–1594PubMed
2.
go back to reference Coleman RE (2001) Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 27(3):165–176PubMed Coleman RE (2001) Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev 27(3):165–176PubMed
3.
go back to reference Diel IJ, Solomayer EF, Bastert G (2000) Treatment of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer: bisphosphonates. Clin Breast Cancer 1(1):43–51PubMed Diel IJ, Solomayer EF, Bastert G (2000) Treatment of metastatic bone disease in breast cancer: bisphosphonates. Clin Breast Cancer 1(1):43–51PubMed
4.
go back to reference Janjan N (2001) Bone metastases: approaches to management. Semin Oncol 28(4 Suppl 11):28–34 Janjan N (2001) Bone metastases: approaches to management. Semin Oncol 28(4 Suppl 11):28–34
6.
go back to reference Scheid V, Buzdar AU, Smith TL et al (1986) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis treated with combination chemotherapy. Cancer 58:2589–2593PubMed Scheid V, Buzdar AU, Smith TL et al (1986) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis treated with combination chemotherapy. Cancer 58:2589–2593PubMed
7.
go back to reference Body J-J (2003) Effectiveness and cost of bisphosphonate therapy in tumor bone disease. Cancer 97(3 Suppl):859–865PubMed Body J-J (2003) Effectiveness and cost of bisphosphonate therapy in tumor bone disease. Cancer 97(3 Suppl):859–865PubMed
8.
go back to reference Delea T, McKiernan J, Liss M et al (2004) Effects of skeletal complications on total medical care costs in women with bone metastases of breast cancer. Bone 34(Suppl 1):S86 (abstract 68) Delea T, McKiernan J, Liss M et al (2004) Effects of skeletal complications on total medical care costs in women with bone metastases of breast cancer. Bone 34(Suppl 1):S86 (abstract 68)
9.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT et al (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:4042–4057PubMed Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT et al (2003) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:4042–4057PubMed
10.
go back to reference Van Poznak CH (2002) The use of bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Control 9(6):480–489PubMed Van Poznak CH (2002) The use of bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Control 9(6):480–489PubMed
11.
go back to reference Body JJ, Bartl R, Burckhardt P, For the International Bone and Cancer Study Group et al (1998) Current use of bisphosphonates in oncology. J Clin Oncol 16:3890–3899PubMed Body JJ, Bartl R, Burckhardt P, For the International Bone and Cancer Study Group et al (1998) Current use of bisphosphonates in oncology. J Clin Oncol 16:3890–3899PubMed
12.
go back to reference DesHarnais Castel L, Bajwa K, Markle JP, Timbie JW, Zacker C, Schulman KA (2001) A microcosting analysis of zoledronic acid and pamidronate therapy in patients with metastatic bone disease. Support Care Cancer 9(7):545–551PubMed DesHarnais Castel L, Bajwa K, Markle JP, Timbie JW, Zacker C, Schulman KA (2001) A microcosting analysis of zoledronic acid and pamidronate therapy in patients with metastatic bone disease. Support Care Cancer 9(7):545–551PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hillner BE, Weeks JC, Desch CE, Smith TJ (2000) Pamidronate in prevention of bone complications in metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol 18(1):72–79PubMed Hillner BE, Weeks JC, Desch CE, Smith TJ (2000) Pamidronate in prevention of bone complications in metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol 18(1):72–79PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Porter L et al (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 335(24):1785–1791PubMed Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Porter L et al (1996) Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 335(24):1785–1791PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Lipton A et al (1998) Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16:2038–2044PubMed Hortobagyi G, Theriault R, Lipton A et al (1998) Long-term prevention of skeletal complications of metastatic breast cancer with pamidronate. Protocol 19 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16:2038–2044PubMed
16.
go back to reference Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN et al (1999) Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 17(3):846–854PubMed Theriault RL, Lipton A, Hortobagyi GN et al (1999) Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 17(3):846–854PubMed
17.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Hsu T (1999) Cost utility analysis of prophylactic pamidronate for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with advanced breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 7(4):271–279PubMed Dranitsaris G, Hsu T (1999) Cost utility analysis of prophylactic pamidronate for the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with advanced breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 7(4):271–279PubMed
18.
go back to reference Beusterien KM, Hill MC, Ackerman SJ, Zacker C (2001) The impact of pamidronate on inpatient and outpatient services among metastatic breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 9(3):169–176PubMed Beusterien KM, Hill MC, Ackerman SJ, Zacker C (2001) The impact of pamidronate on inpatient and outpatient services among metastatic breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 9(3):169–176PubMed
19.
go back to reference Laakso M, Lahtinen R, Virkkunen P, Elomaa I (1994) Subgroup and cost-benefit analysis of the Finnish multicentre trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Finnish Leukaemia Group. Br J Haematol 87(4):725–729PubMed Laakso M, Lahtinen R, Virkkunen P, Elomaa I (1994) Subgroup and cost-benefit analysis of the Finnish multicentre trial of clodronate in multiple myeloma. Finnish Leukaemia Group. Br J Haematol 87(4):725–729PubMed
20.
go back to reference Bruce NJ, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Guest JF (1999) Economic impact of using clodronate in the management of patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 104(2):358–364PubMed Bruce NJ, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Guest JF (1999) Economic impact of using clodronate in the management of patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 104(2):358–364PubMed
21.
go back to reference Body J-J, Kanis J, Diel I, Bergstrom B (2003) Risk reductions in metastatic breast cancer: multivariate Poisson regression analyses of oral and i.v. ibandronate. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:46 (abstract 184) Body J-J, Kanis J, Diel I, Bergstrom B (2003) Risk reductions in metastatic breast cancer: multivariate Poisson regression analyses of oral and i.v. ibandronate. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:46 (abstract 184)
22.
go back to reference Body J-J, Diel IJ, Lichinitzer M et al (2004a) Oral ibandronate reduces the risk of skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: results from two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III studies. Br J Cancer 90(6):1133–1137PubMed Body J-J, Diel IJ, Lichinitzer M et al (2004a) Oral ibandronate reduces the risk of skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: results from two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III studies. Br J Cancer 90(6):1133–1137PubMed
23.
go back to reference Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M et al (2001) Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a phase III, double-blind, comparative trial. Cancer J 7(5):377–387PubMed Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M et al (2001) Zoledronic acid versus pamidronate in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer or osteolytic lesions of multiple myeloma: a phase III, double-blind, comparative trial. Cancer J 7(5):377–387PubMed
24.
go back to reference Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M et al (2003a) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 98:1735–1744PubMed Rosen LS, Gordon D, Kaminski M et al (2003a) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid compared with pamidronate disodium in the treatment of skeletal complications in patients with advanced multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, comparative trial. Cancer 98:1735–1744PubMed
25.
go back to reference Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian S et al (2003b) Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial—the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and other solid tumors study group. J Clin Oncol 21:3150–3157PubMed Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian S et al (2003b) Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial—the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and other solid tumors study group. J Clin Oncol 21:3150–3157PubMed
26.
go back to reference Saad F (2002) Zoledronic acid significantly reduces pathologic fractures in patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Clin Prostate Cancer 1:145–152PubMed Saad F (2002) Zoledronic acid significantly reduces pathologic fractures in patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Clin Prostate Cancer 1:145–152PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090PubMed Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090PubMed
28.
go back to reference Tripathy D, Body J-J, Diel IJ, Bergstrom B (2003) Intravenous and oral ibandronate alleviate pain in patients with skeletal metastases from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82(Suppl 1):S133–S134 (abstract 548) Tripathy D, Body J-J, Diel IJ, Bergstrom B (2003) Intravenous and oral ibandronate alleviate pain in patients with skeletal metastases from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82(Suppl 1):S133–S134 (abstract 548)
29.
go back to reference Fulfaro F, Casuccio A, Ticozzi C, Ripamonti C (1998) The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of painful metastatic bone disease: a review of phase III trials. Pain 78(3):157–169PubMed Fulfaro F, Casuccio A, Ticozzi C, Ripamonti C (1998) The role of bisphosphonates in the treatment of painful metastatic bone disease: a review of phase III trials. Pain 78(3):157–169PubMed
30.
go back to reference Berenson JR (2001) Zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases: results of phase I and II trials. Semin Oncol 28(2 Suppl 6):25–34 Berenson JR (2001) Zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases: results of phase I and II trials. Semin Oncol 28(2 Suppl 6):25–34
31.
go back to reference Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
32.
go back to reference van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FF (1994) Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 3:309–319PubMed van Hout BA, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FF (1994) Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 3:309–319PubMed
33.
go back to reference Diel I, Bell R, Tripathy D, Body J-J, Bergstrom B (2003) Renal safety of oral and intravenous ibandronate in metastatic bone disease: phase III clinical trial results. Support Care Cancer 11:415 (abstract A-106) Diel I, Bell R, Tripathy D, Body J-J, Bergstrom B (2003) Renal safety of oral and intravenous ibandronate in metastatic bone disease: phase III clinical trial results. Support Care Cancer 11:415 (abstract A-106)
34.
go back to reference Li EC, Davis LE (2003) Zoledronic acid: a new parenteral bisphosphonate. Clin Ther 25(11):2669–2708PubMed Li EC, Davis LE (2003) Zoledronic acid: a new parenteral bisphosphonate. Clin Ther 25(11):2669–2708PubMed
35.
go back to reference Ibrahim A, Scher N, Williams G et al (2003) Approval summary for zoledronic acid for treatment of multiple myeloma and cancer bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res 9(7):2394–2399PubMed Ibrahim A, Scher N, Williams G et al (2003) Approval summary for zoledronic acid for treatment of multiple myeloma and cancer bone metastases. Clin Cancer Res 9(7):2394–2399PubMed
36.
go back to reference Body J, Diel I, Bergström B (2004b) Intravenous ibandronate does not affect time to renal function deterioration in patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:405 (A-120) Body J, Diel I, Bergström B (2004b) Intravenous ibandronate does not affect time to renal function deterioration in patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:405 (A-120)
37.
go back to reference Chang JT, Green L, Beitz J (2003) Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. N Engl J Med 349:1676–1679PubMed Chang JT, Green L, Beitz J (2003) Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. N Engl J Med 349:1676–1679PubMed
38.
go back to reference PSSRU (2003) Unit costs of health and social care 2003. University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury PSSRU (2003) Unit costs of health and social care 2003. University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
39.
go back to reference MEDTAP International (2003) MEDTAP Unit Cost Database MEDTAP International (2003) MEDTAP Unit Cost Database
40.
go back to reference Johnson KB, Gable P, Kaime EM, Luiken G, Castillos T, Hu J (2003) Significant deterioration in renal function with the new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:738 (abstract 2968) Johnson KB, Gable P, Kaime EM, Luiken G, Castillos T, Hu J (2003) Significant deterioration in renal function with the new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:738 (abstract 2968)
41.
go back to reference Mazj S, Lichtman SMI (2004) Renal dysfunction associated with bisphosphonate use: retrospective analysis of 293 patients with respect to age and other clinical characteristics. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:735 (abstract 8039) Mazj S, Lichtman SMI (2004) Renal dysfunction associated with bisphosphonate use: retrospective analysis of 293 patients with respect to age and other clinical characteristics. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:735 (abstract 8039)
42.
go back to reference De Cock E, Hutton J, Barrett-Lee P et al (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral ibandronate versus i.v.zoledronic acid or i.v.generic pamidronate for bone metastases from breast cancer in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy in the UK. EU ISPOR 2004 (submitted for publication) De Cock E, Hutton J, Barrett-Lee P et al (2004) Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral ibandronate versus i.v.zoledronic acid or i.v.generic pamidronate for bone metastases from breast cancer in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy in the UK. EU ISPOR 2004 (submitted for publication)
43.
go back to reference Powles T, Paterson S, Kanis JA et al (2002) Randomized placebo-controlled trial of clodronate in patients with primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3219–3224PubMed Powles T, Paterson S, Kanis JA et al (2002) Randomized placebo-controlled trial of clodronate in patients with primary operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3219–3224PubMed
44.
go back to reference van den Hout WB, van der Linden YM, Steenland E et al (2003) Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(3):222–229PubMed van den Hout WB, van der Linden YM, Steenland E et al (2003) Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 95(3):222–229PubMed
45.
48.
go back to reference Verrill M, De Cock E, Hutton J, Body JJ, Canney P, Neary M, Lewis G (2004) Medical resource use and costs for oral ibandronic acid compared to i.v. zoledronic acid or i.v. pamidronate for metastatic bone disease from breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15(Suppl. 3): iii51:(Abstract 192P) Verrill M, De Cock E, Hutton J, Body JJ, Canney P, Neary M, Lewis G (2004) Medical resource use and costs for oral ibandronic acid compared to i.v. zoledronic acid or i.v. pamidronate for metastatic bone disease from breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15(Suppl. 3): iii51:(Abstract 192P)
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy
Authors
E. De Cock
J. Hutton
P. Canney
J. J. Body
P. Barrett-Lee
M. P. Neary
G. Lewis
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0828-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2005 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine