Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Experience in the use of the palliative care outcome scale

Authors: A.-M. Stevens, B. Gwilliam, R. A’Hern, K. Broadley, J. Hardy

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

The objective of the study is to assess the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) as a potential audit tool within a specialist cancer centre. It also aims to answer the following questions: does the tool identify problem areas and demonstrate changes in quality of life over time? How well do staff and patient ratings correlate?

Patients and methods

The POS questionnaire was piloted at a specialist cancer centre. Thirty consecutive patients admitted to the palliative care wards and ward staff completed questionnaires on admission and twice weekly until discharge or death. A further questionnaire assessed staff attitudes.

Results

There was a significant improvement in overall patient POS score at 1 week (days 5–9). Four “symptoms” or issues were scored as being important for our patients: pain, other symptoms, anxiety and patient’s perception of family anxiety. These all significantly improved within the first week. At the initial assessment, staff underestimated patients’ pain and overestimated problems relating to information giving and patients’ ability to share their feelings. There was no significant difference between staff and patient scores after 1 week. The other six areas covered by the tool were less important; this may reflect the patient population seen at our centre. Use of the tool identified areas for staff training and effectively demonstrated improvement in patient care.

Conclusion

The POS is an outcome measure tool designed to assess physical, psychological, practical and existential aspects of quality of life. It may be useful in identifying problems in individual patients and directing care to address these needs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hearn J, Higginson IJ (1997) Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health Med 19(2):193–199 Hearn J, Higginson IJ (1997) Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: a review. J Public Health Med 19(2):193–199
2.
go back to reference Hearn J, Higginson IJ (1999) Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Qual Health Care 8:219–227 Hearn J, Higginson IJ (1999) Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Qual Health Care 8:219–227
3.
go back to reference Rees E, Hardy J, Ling J, Broadley K, A’Hern R (1998) The use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within a palliative care unit in the UK. Palliat Med 12:75–82 Rees E, Hardy J, Ling J, Broadley K, A’Hern R (1998) The use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) within a palliative care unit in the UK. Palliat Med 12:75–82
4.
go back to reference Hardy J, Edmonds P, Turner R, Rees E, A’Hern R (1999) The use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in Palliative Care. J Pain Symp Manag 18 (2):79–84 Hardy J, Edmonds P, Turner R, Rees E, A’Hern R (1999) The use of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist in Palliative Care. J Pain Symp Manag 18 (2):79–84
5.
go back to reference Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109–112 Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM (1988) Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? Br J Cancer 57:109–112
6.
go back to reference Higginson IJ, McCarthy M (1993) Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staff’s rating reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 7:219–228 Higginson IJ, McCarthy M (1993) Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staff’s rating reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 7:219–228
7.
go back to reference Field D, Douglas C, Jagger C et al (1995) Terminal illness: views of patients and their lay carers. Palliat Med 9:45–54 Field D, Douglas C, Jagger C et al (1995) Terminal illness: views of patients and their lay carers. Palliat Med 9:45–54
8.
go back to reference Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S, Harlos M (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet 360:2026–2030 Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S, Harlos M (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet 360:2026–2030
Metadata
Title
Experience in the use of the palliative care outcome scale
Authors
A.-M. Stevens
B. Gwilliam
R. A’Hern
K. Broadley
J. Hardy
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0815-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2005 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine