Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2024

Open Access 18-03-2024

Analysis of factors influencing pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and establishment of a new prediction model for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula

Authors: Yuwen Zhu, Di Wu, Hao Yang, Zekun Lu, Zhiliang Wang, Guangchen Zu, Zheng Li, Xiaowu Xu, Yue Zhang, Xuemin Chen, Weibo Chen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most prevalent complications following minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). Only one model related to MIPD exists, and previous POPF scoring prediction methods are based on open pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Our objectives are to determine the variables that may increase the probability of pancreatic fistula following MIPD and to develop and validate a POPF predictive risk model.

Methods

Data from 432 patients who underwent MIPD between July 2015 and May 2022 were retrospectively collected. A nomogram prediction model was created using multivariate logistic regression analysis to evaluate independent factors for POPF in patients undergoing MIPD in the modeling cohort. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the calibration curve were used to verify the nomogram prediction model internally and externally within the modeling cohort and the verification cohort.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI), albumin, triglycerides, pancreatic duct diameter, pathological diagnosis and intraoperative bleeding were independent variables for POPF. On the basis of this information, a model for the prediction of risks associated with POPF was developed. In accordance with the ROC analysis, the modeling cohort's AUC was 0.819 (95% CI 0.747–0.891), the internal validation cohort's AUC was 0.830 (95% CI 0.747–0.912), and the external validation cohort's AUC was 0.793 (95% CI 0.671–0.915). Based on the calibration curve, the estimated values of POPF have a high degree of concordance with the actual values that were measured.

Conclusions

This model for predicting the probability of pancreatic fistula following MIPD has strong predictive capacity and can provide a trustworthy predictive method for the early screening of high-risk patients with pancreatic fistula after MIPD and timely clinical intervention.
Literature
1.
Yamashita Y, Shirabe K, Tsujita E, Takeishi K, Ikeda T, Yoshizumi T, Furukawa Y, Ishida T, Maehara Y (2013) Surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors in elderly patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:539–545CrossRefPubMed
2.
Brown EG, Yang A, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2014) Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: where should we focus our efforts on improving outcomes? JAMA Surg 149:694–699CrossRefPubMed
3.
McMillan MT, Malleo G, Bassi C, Sprys MH, Vollmer CM Jr (2015) Defining the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy around the world. HPB (Oxford) 17:1145–1154CrossRefPubMed
4.
Xiang Y, Wu J, Lin C, Yang Y, Zhang D, Xie Y, Yao X, Zhang X (2019) Pancreatic reconstruction techniques after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:797–806CrossRefPubMed
5.
Wang M, Peng B, Liu J, Yin X, Tan Z, Liu R, Hong D, Zhao W, Wu H, Chen R, Li D, Huang H, Miao Y, Liu Y, Liang T, Wang W, Cai Y, Xing Z, Cheng W, Zhong X, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Yang Z, Li G, Shao Y, Lin G, Jiang K, Wu P, Jia B, Ma T, Jiang C, Peng S, Qin R (2021) Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg 273:145–153CrossRefPubMed
6.
Delitto D, Luckhurst CM, Black BS, Beck JL, George TJ Jr, Sarosi GA, Thomas RM, Trevino JG, Behrns KE, Hughes SJ (2016) Oncologic and perioperative outcomes following selective application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1343–1349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Kantor O, Pitt HA, Talamonti MS, Roggin KK, Bentrem DJ, Prinz RA, Baker MS (2018) Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: is the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula comparable to that after open pancreatoduodenectomy? Surgery 163:587–593CrossRefPubMed
8.
Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (2010) Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg 145:634–640CrossRefPubMed
9.
McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston M, Callery MP, Christein JD, Dixon E, Drebin JA, Castillo CF, Fisher WE, Fong ZV, House MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Miller BC, Salem RR, Soares K, Valero V, Wolfgang CL, Vollmer CM Jr (2016) Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann Surg 264:344–352CrossRefPubMed
10.
Pedrazzoli S (2017) Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF): a systematic review and analysis of the POPF-related mortality rate in 60,739 patients retrieved from the English literature published between 1990 and 2015. Medicine (Baltimore) 96:e6858CrossRefPubMed
11.
Vallance AE, Young AL, Macutkiewicz C, Roberts KJ, Smith AM (2015) Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 17:1040–1048CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr (2013) A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1–14CrossRefPubMed
14.
Mathew G, Agha R, Albrecht J, Goel P, Mukherjee I, Pai P, D’Cruz AK, Nixon IJ, Roberto K, Enam SA, Basu S, Muensterer OJ, Giordano S, Pagano D, Machado-Aranda D, Bradley PJ, Bashashati M, Thoma A, Afifi RY, Johnston M, Challacombe B, Ngu JC, Chalkoo M, Raveendran K, Hoffman JR, Kirshtein B, Lau WY, Thorat MA, Miguel D, Beamish AJ, Roy G, Healy D, Ather HM, Raja SG, Mei Z, Manning TG, Kasivisvanathan V, Rivas JG, Coppola R, Ekser B, Karanth VL, Kadioglu H, Valmasoni M, Noureldin A (2021) STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 96:106165CrossRefPubMed
15.
Tan Y, Tang T, Zhang Y, Zu G, An Y, Chen W, Wu D, Sun D, Chen X (2020) Laparoscopic vs. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study in elderly people. Updates Surg 72:701–707CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zhu Y, Zu G, Wu D, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Wu H, Chen X, Chen W (2022) Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Front Oncol 12:1057337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed
18.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
19.
El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37:1405–1418CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zhang H, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi CJ, Wang X, Jiang JX, Hu J, Wang M, Qin RY (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing three techniques for pancreatic remnant closure following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 102:4–15CrossRefPubMed
21.
Pan J, Ge X, Zhou W, Zhong X, Gu L, Zhu H, Li X, Qi W, Wang X (2018) Comparison of clinical outcomes between mesh-reinforced pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 16:190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Mungroop TH, Klompmaker S, Wellner UF, Steyerberg EW, Coratti A, D’Hondt M, de Pastena M, Dokmak S, Khatkov I, Saint-Marc O, Wittel U, Abu Hilal M, Fuks D, Poves I, Keck T, Boggi U, Besselink MG (2021) Updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS) to include minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: pan-european validation. Ann Surg 273:334–340CrossRefPubMed
23.
You Y, Han IW, Choi DW, Heo JS, Ryu Y, Park DJ, Choi SH, Han S (2019) Nomogram for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula. HPB (Oxford) 21:1436–1445CrossRefPubMed
24.
Wu W, Yao X, Lin C, Jin D, Wang D, Lou W, Qin X (2014) Should Steroid therapy be necessarily needed for autoimmune pancreatitis patients with lesion resected due to misdiagnosed or suspected malignancy? Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014:253471CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Liu QY, Zhang WZ, Xia HT, Leng JJ, Wan T, Liang B, Yang T, Dong JH (2014) Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20:17491–17497CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A, Noullet S, Clavel L, Rebours V, Lévy P, Sauvanet A, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23CrossRefPubMed
27.
Faraj W, Alameddine R, Mukherji D, Musallam K, Haydar A, Eloubiedi M, Shamseddine A, Halal A, Abou-Alfa GK, O’Reilly EM, Jamali F, Khalife M (2013) Postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: how should age affect clinical practice? World J Surg Oncol 11:131CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zarzavadjian Le Bian A, Fuks D, Chopinet S, Gaujoux S, Cesaretti M, Costi R, Belgaumkar AP, Smadja C, Gayet B (2017) Consequences of metabolic syndrome on postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 23:3142–3149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P, Oussoultzoglou E, Panaro F, Mahfud M, Jaeck D, Bachellier P (2009) The role of “fatty pancreas” and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1845–1851CrossRefPubMed
30.
Huang R, Liu B, Chen H, Bai X, Kong R, Wang G, Wang Y, Sun B, Guan Y (2015) Risk factors and medico-economic effect of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:917689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Schuh F, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Trudeau MT, Müller PC, Marchegiani G, Besselink MG, Uzunoglu F, Izbicki JR, Falconi M, Castillo CF, Adham M, Z’Graggen K, Friess H, Werner J, Weitz J, Strobel O, Hackert T, Radenkovic D, Kelemen D, Wolfgang C, Miao YI, Shrikhande SV, Lillemoe KD, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Neoptolemos JP, Diener MK, Vollmer CM Jr, Büchler MW (2023) A simple classification of pancreatic duct size and texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula: a classification of the international study group of pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 277:e597–e608CrossRefPubMed
32.
Uchida Y, Masui T, Nakano K, Yogo A, Sato A, Nagai K, Anazawa T, Takaori K, Tabata Y, Uemoto S (2019) Clinical and experimental studies of intraperitoneal lipolysis and the development of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 106:616–625CrossRefPubMed
33.
Trudeau MT, Casciani F, Maggino L, Seykora TF, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston MP, Callery MP, Castillo CF, Christein JD, Dillhoff ME, Dickson EJ, Dixon E, Fisher WE, House MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Malleo G, Salem RR, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Vollmer CM (2022) The influence of intraoperative blood loss on fistula development following pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 276:e527–e535CrossRefPubMed
34.
Casciani F, Trudeau MT, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston MP, Callery MP, Christein JD, Falconi M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Dillhoff ME, Dickson EJ, Dixon E, Fisher WE, House MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Partelli S, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Vollmer CM (2021) The effect of high intraoperative blood loss on pancreatic fistula development after pancreatoduodenectomy: an international, multi-institutional propensity score matched analysis. Surgery 170:1195–1204CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of factors influencing pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy and establishment of a new prediction model for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula
Authors
Yuwen Zhu
Di Wu
Hao Yang
Zekun Lu
Zhiliang Wang
Guangchen Zu
Zheng Li
Xiaowu Xu
Yue Zhang
Xuemin Chen
Weibo Chen
Publication date
18-03-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10770-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2024 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy among malnourished patients with gastric cancer based on textbook outcome

OriginalPaper

Efficacy of endoscopic surveillance for pharyngeal mucosa during endoscopic resection for pharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study

SAGES/EAES Official Publication

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons guidelines development: health equity update to standard operating procedure

OriginalPaper

Endoscopic resection and laparoscopic lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer beyond conventional endoscopic treatment indications: a 10-year outcome study

OriginalPaper

Risk factors for stoma prolapse after laparoscopic loop colostomy

OriginalPaper

Balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for hepatolithiasis in patients with hepaticojejunostomy