Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2024

11-04-2024 | Enterostomy

Risk factors for stoma prolapse after laparoscopic loop colostomy

Authors: Yusuke Takashima, Hitoshi Hino, Akio Shiomi, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Shoichi Manabe, Yusuke Yamaoka, Chikara Maeda, Shunsuke Kasai, Yusuke Tanaka

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stoma prolapse (SP) is a common stoma-related complication, particularly in loop colostomies. This study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for SP development after laparoscopic loop colostomy.

Methods

In total, data from 140 patients who underwent laparoscopic loop colostomy were analyzed between September 2016 and March 2022. Risk factors for SP were investigated retrospectively.

Results

The median follow-up duration after colostomy was 12.5 months, and SP occurred in 33 (23.6%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that being overweight (body mass index ≥ 25; odds ratio [OR], 8.69; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.61–46.72; p = 0.012) and having a thin rectus abdominis penetration of the stoma (< 8.9 mm; OR, 8.22; 95% CI, 2.50–27.05; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SP. Other patient characteristics and surgical factors associated with stoma construction were unrelated to SP development.

Conclusions

Being overweight and the route penetrating the thinner rectus abdominis during stoma construction was associated with a significantly higher incidence of SP after laparoscopic loop colostomy. Selecting a construction site that penetrates the thicker rectus abdominis muscle may be crucial for preventing SP.

Graphical abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Garoufalia Z, Mavrantonis S, Emile SH, Gefen R, Horesh N, Freund MR, Wexner SD (2023) Surgical treatment of stomal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Colorectal Dis 25:1128–1134CrossRefPubMed Garoufalia Z, Mavrantonis S, Emile SH, Gefen R, Horesh N, Freund MR, Wexner SD (2023) Surgical treatment of stomal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Colorectal Dis 25:1128–1134CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Harris DA, Egbeare D, Jones S, Benjamin H, Woodward A, Foster ME (2005) Complications and mortality following stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:427–431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris DA, Egbeare D, Jones S, Benjamin H, Woodward A, Foster ME (2005) Complications and mortality following stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:427–431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Gavriilidis P, Azoulay D, Taflampas P (2019) Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis. Surg Today 49:108–117CrossRefPubMed Gavriilidis P, Azoulay D, Taflampas P (2019) Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis. Surg Today 49:108–117CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, Bolognese A, Covarelli P, Boselli C, Becattini C, Noya G (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:479–488CrossRefPubMed Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, Bolognese A, Covarelli P, Boselli C, Becattini C, Noya G (2009) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:479–488CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Du R, Zhou J, Tong G, Chang Y, Li D, Wang F, Ding X, Zhang Q, Wang W, Wang L, Wang D (2021) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: a updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:1514–1525CrossRefPubMed Du R, Zhou J, Tong G, Chang Y, Li D, Wang F, Ding X, Zhang Q, Wang W, Wang L, Wang D (2021) Postoperative morbidity and mortality after anterior resection with preventive diverting loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for rectal cancer: a updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:1514–1525CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McErlain D, Kane M, McGrogan M, Haughey S (2004) Clinical protocols for stoma care: 5. Prolapsed stoma. Nurs Stand 18:41–42CrossRefPubMed McErlain D, Kane M, McGrogan M, Haughey S (2004) Clinical protocols for stoma care: 5. Prolapsed stoma. Nurs Stand 18:41–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Kotake M, Hada M, Sawada K, Oshima M, Kato Y, Oyama K, Hara T (2017) Laparoscopic versus open stoma creation: a retrospective analysis. J Anus Rectum Colon 1:84–88CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Kotake M, Hada M, Sawada K, Oshima M, Kato Y, Oyama K, Hara T (2017) Laparoscopic versus open stoma creation: a retrospective analysis. J Anus Rectum Colon 1:84–88CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Liu J, Bruch HP, Farke S, Nolde J, Schwandner O (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9:9–14CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Bruch HP, Farke S, Nolde J, Schwandner O (2005) Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach. Tech Coloproctol 9:9–14CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ivatury SJ, Bostock Rosenzweig IC, Holubar SD (2016) Short-term outcomes after open and laparoscopic colostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 59:543–550CrossRefPubMed Ivatury SJ, Bostock Rosenzweig IC, Holubar SD (2016) Short-term outcomes after open and laparoscopic colostomy creation. Dis Colon Rectum 59:543–550CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Singh N, Haque PD, Upadhyay S, Chaudhry NK (2019) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid loop colostomy: a comparative study from a cohort of 62 patients requiring temporary faecal diversion at a tertiary care center in North India. Niger J Surg 25:139–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh N, Haque PD, Upadhyay S, Chaudhry NK (2019) Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid loop colostomy: a comparative study from a cohort of 62 patients requiring temporary faecal diversion at a tertiary care center in North India. Niger J Surg 25:139–145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Krogsgaard M, Borglit TB, Eriksen JR (2023) The perfect stoma: tips from a stoma nurse. Br J Surg 110:1249–1251CrossRefPubMed Krogsgaard M, Borglit TB, Eriksen JR (2023) The perfect stoma: tips from a stoma nurse. Br J Surg 110:1249–1251CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Martin ST, Vogel JD (2012) Intestinal stomas: indications, management, and complications. Adv Surg 46:19–49CrossRefPubMed Martin ST, Vogel JD (2012) Intestinal stomas: indications, management, and complications. Adv Surg 46:19–49CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, Trimble EL, Kaplan R, Montello MJ, Housman MG, Escarce JJ (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21:1383–1389CrossRefPubMed Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, Trimble EL, Kaplan R, Montello MJ, Housman MG, Escarce JJ (2003) Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21:1383–1389CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, Long MW, Gortmaker SL (2019) Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med 381:2440–2450CrossRefPubMed Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, Barrett JL, Giles CM, Flax C, Long MW, Gortmaker SL (2019) Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med 381:2440–2450CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96:644–647CrossRefPubMed Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96:644–647CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, Sato H, Masumori K, Aoyama H (2003) Pathophysiology and prevention of loop stomal prolapse in the transverse colon. Tech Coloproctol 7:108–111CrossRefPubMed Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, Sato H, Masumori K, Aoyama H (2003) Pathophysiology and prevention of loop stomal prolapse in the transverse colon. Tech Coloproctol 7:108–111CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Khan S-Z, Steinhagen E (2023) Stoma prolapse. Seminars in colon and rectal surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 100958 Khan S-Z, Steinhagen E (2023) Stoma prolapse. Seminars in colon and rectal surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 100958
21.
go back to reference Higashimoto I, Teshima J, Ozawa Y, Usuda M, Miyata G (2023) Temporary loop ileostomy versus transverse colostomy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a retrospective study. Surg Today 53:621–627CrossRefPubMed Higashimoto I, Teshima J, Ozawa Y, Usuda M, Miyata G (2023) Temporary loop ileostomy versus transverse colostomy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a retrospective study. Surg Today 53:621–627CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25:274–277CrossRefPubMed Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J (2001) Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 25:274–277CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebösel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J, Neumann UP, Jansen M, Willis S (2011) Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 26:431–436CrossRefPubMed Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebösel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J, Neumann UP, Jansen M, Willis S (2011) Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 26:431–436CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sun X, Han H, Qiu H, Wu B, Lin G, Niu B, Zhou J, Lu J, Xu L, Zhang G, Xiao Y (2019) Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: a retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study. J buon 24:123–129PubMed Sun X, Han H, Qiu H, Wu B, Lin G, Niu B, Zhou J, Lu J, Xu L, Zhang G, Xiao Y (2019) Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: a retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study. J buon 24:123–129PubMed
25.
go back to reference Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570CrossRefPubMed Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) De-functioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79CrossRefPubMed Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363CrossRefPubMed Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708CrossRefPubMed Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7:279–285CrossRefPubMed Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, Spiers M, Donnelly L, Mackenzie I, Macdonald A (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis 7:279–285CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Koide Y, Maeda K, Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, Matsuoka H, Endo T, Cheong YC, Uyama I (2021) Outcomes of stapler repair with anastomosis for stoma prolapse. Surg Today 51:226–231CrossRefPubMed Koide Y, Maeda K, Katsuno H, Hanai T, Masumori K, Matsuoka H, Endo T, Cheong YC, Uyama I (2021) Outcomes of stapler repair with anastomosis for stoma prolapse. Surg Today 51:226–231CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for stoma prolapse after laparoscopic loop colostomy
Authors
Yusuke Takashima
Hitoshi Hino
Akio Shiomi
Hiroyasu Kagawa
Shoichi Manabe
Yusuke Yamaoka
Chikara Maeda
Shunsuke Kasai
Yusuke Tanaka
Publication date
11-04-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10802-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2024 Go to the issue