Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Gastrectomy

Potential survival benefits of open over laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients beyond three years after surgery: result from multicenter in-depth analysis based on propensity matching

Authors: Ze-Ning Huang, YuBin Ma, Qi-Yue Chen, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Jun Lu, Long-Long Cao, Mi Lin, Ru-Hong Tu, Ju-Li Lin, Hua-Long Zheng, Chang-Ming Huang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer (ADGC) beyond 3 years after surgery remain obscure.

Methods

A total of 1256 patients with ADGC at two teaching institutions in China from April 2007 to December 2014 were enrolled. The general data of the two groups were identified to enable rigorous estimation of propensity scores. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) and Landmark analysis was used to compare survival.

Results

After matching 461 patients each in the open distal gastrectomy (ODG) and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) groups, they were included into analysis. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were comparable in two groups. RMST-stratified analysis showed that the 3-year RMST of ODG group was similar to that of LDG group in patients with cT4a (− 1.38 years, p = 0.163) or with cT4a and tumor size > 5 cm, whereas the 5-year RMST had significant differences between groups in cT4a patients(− 8.36 years, P = 0.005) or cT4a and tumor size > 5 cm patients(4.67 years, P = 0.042). In patients with cT4a and tumors > 5 cm, the number of peritoneal recurrences was significantly fewer in the ODG group than in the LDG group (4 vs. 17, P = 0.033), and the peritoneal recurrence time and multiple-site recurrence time were both later in the ODG group.

Conclusion

By reducing recurrence, ODG achieves a better survival for GC patients with serous infiltration and tumors larger than 5 cm beyond 3 years after surgery. The present findings can serve as a reference for surgical options and the setting of follow-up time point for clinical studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
7.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU et al (2016) Korean laparo endoscopic gastrointestinal surgery study (KLASS) group. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346CrossRefPubMed Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU et al (2016) Korean laparo endoscopic gastrointestinal surgery study (KLASS) group. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000001346​CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20(4):699–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20(4):699–708. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10120-016-0646-9CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS (2009) Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy- assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. SurgEndosc 23(8):1759–1763 Lee JH, Yom CK, Han HS (2009) Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy- assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. SurgEndosc 23(8):1759–1763
11.
go back to reference Lee SW, Nomura E, Bouras G et al (2010) Long-term oncologic outcomes from laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center experience of 601 consecutive resections. J Am CollSurg 211(1):33–40 Lee SW, Nomura E, Bouras G et al (2010) Long-term oncologic outcomes from laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center experience of 601 consecutive resections. J Am CollSurg 211(1):33–40
12.
go back to reference Yasuda K, Sonoda K, Shiroshita H et al (2004) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg 91(8):1061–1065CrossRef Yasuda K, Sonoda K, Shiroshita H et al (2004) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg 91(8):1061–1065CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY (2019) Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5(4):506–513CrossRef Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY (2019) Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5(4):506–513CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH et al (2017) Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: international gastric cancer association staging project. Gastric Cancer 20(2):217–225CrossRef Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH et al (2017) Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: international gastric cancer association staging project. Gastric Cancer 20(2):217–225CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA (1991) Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 180:319–322CrossRef Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH, Sandler MA (1991) Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 180:319–322CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST et al (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multidetector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885CrossRef Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST et al (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multidetector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zheng ZF, Lu J, Zheng CH et al (2017) A novel prognostic scoring system based on preoperative sarcopenia predicts the long-term outcome for patients after R0 resection for gastric cancer: experiences of a high-volume center. Ann SurgOncol 24:1795–1803 Zheng ZF, Lu J, Zheng CH et al (2017) A novel prognostic scoring system based on preoperative sarcopenia predicts the long-term outcome for patients after R0 resection for gastric cancer: experiences of a high-volume center. Ann SurgOncol 24:1795–1803
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD et al (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J ClinOncol 1(11):710–719CrossRef Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD et al (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J ClinOncol 1(11):710–719CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rubin DB, Thomas N (2000) Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 95:573–585CrossRef Rubin DB, Thomas N (2000) Combining propensity score matching with additional adjustments for prognostic covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 95:573–585CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H et al (2000) Laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer located in the middle or lower third portion of the stomach. Gastric Cancer 3(1):50–55CrossRef Uyama I, Sugioka A, Matsui H et al (2000) Laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer located in the middle or lower third portion of the stomach. Gastric Cancer 3(1):50–55CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Guo P, Li Y, Zhu Z et al (2013) Prognostic value of tumor size in gastric cancer: an analysis of 2379 patients. Tumour Biol 34:1027–1035CrossRef Guo P, Li Y, Zhu Z et al (2013) Prognostic value of tumor size in gastric cancer: an analysis of 2379 patients. Tumour Biol 34:1027–1035CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Mohri Y, Tanaka K, Ohi M et al (2010) Prognostic significance of host- and tumor-related factors in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg 34:285–290CrossRef Mohri Y, Tanaka K, Ohi M et al (2010) Prognostic significance of host- and tumor-related factors in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg 34:285–290CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang HM, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2012) Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the lower third of the stomach. World J Gastroenterol 18:5470–5475CrossRef Wang HM, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2012) Tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced gastric cancer in the lower third of the stomach. World J Gastroenterol 18:5470–5475CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Watanabe T et al (2011) Macroscopic tumor size as an independent prognostic factor for stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. Gastric Cancer 14:274–278CrossRef Aoyama T, Yoshikawa T, Watanabe T et al (2011) Macroscopic tumor size as an independent prognostic factor for stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. Gastric Cancer 14:274–278CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lu J, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2013) Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. SurgOncol 22:167–171 Lu J, Huang CM, Zheng CH et al (2013) Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. SurgOncol 22:167–171
30.
go back to reference Deng J, Zhang R, Pan Y et al (2015) Tumor size as a recommendable variable for accuracy of the prognostic prediction of gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of 1521 patients. Ann SurgOncol 22:565–572 Deng J, Zhang R, Pan Y et al (2015) Tumor size as a recommendable variable for accuracy of the prognostic prediction of gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis of 1521 patients. Ann SurgOncol 22:565–572
31.
go back to reference Quan J, Zhang R, Liang H et al (2013) The impact of tumor size on survival of patients with pT4aN0M0 gastric cancer. Am Surg 79:328–331CrossRef Quan J, Zhang R, Liang H et al (2013) The impact of tumor size on survival of patients with pT4aN0M0 gastric cancer. Am Surg 79:328–331CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huang CM, Xu M, Wang JB et al (2014) Istumor size a predictor of preoperative N staging in T2–T4a stage advanced gastric cancer? SurgOncol 23:5–10 Huang CM, Xu M, Wang JB et al (2014) Istumor size a predictor of preoperative N staging in T2–T4a stage advanced gastric cancer? SurgOncol 23:5–10
33.
go back to reference Sasako M (2017) Is there role for laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Eur J SurgOncol 43:965–967CrossRef Sasako M (2017) Is there role for laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Eur J SurgOncol 43:965–967CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Redondo-Cerezo E, Martinez-Cara JG, Jimenez-Rosales R et al (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound in gastric cancer staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A comparison with PET-CT in a clinical series. United EurGastroenterol J 5(5):641–647CrossRef Redondo-Cerezo E, Martinez-Cara JG, Jimenez-Rosales R et al (2017) Endoscopic ultrasound in gastric cancer staging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A comparison with PET-CT in a clinical series. United EurGastroenterol J 5(5):641–647CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Fairweather M, Jajoo K, Sainani N et al (2015) Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging. J SurgOncol 111(8):1016–1020 Fairweather M, Jajoo K, Sainani N et al (2015) Accuracy of EUS and CT imaging in preoperative gastric cancer staging. J SurgOncol 111(8):1016–1020
36.
go back to reference Jurgensen C, Brand J, Nothnagel M et al (2013) Prognostic relevance of gastric cancer staging by endoscopic ultrasound. SurgEndosc 27(4):1124–1129 Jurgensen C, Brand J, Nothnagel M et al (2013) Prognostic relevance of gastric cancer staging by endoscopic ultrasound. SurgEndosc 27(4):1124–1129
37.
go back to reference Han C, Lin R, Shi H et al (2016) The role of endoscopic ultrasound on the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(36):e4580CrossRef Han C, Lin R, Shi H et al (2016) The role of endoscopic ultrasound on the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(36):e4580CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Nie RC, Yuan SQ, Chen XJ et al (2017) Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with multidetector computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J SurgOncol 15(1):113–120 Nie RC, Yuan SQ, Chen XJ et al (2017) Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with multidetector computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J SurgOncol 15(1):113–120
39.
go back to reference Li JH, Shen WZ, Gu XQ et al (2017) Prognostic value of EUS combined with MSCT in predicting the recurrence and metastasis of patients with gastric cancer. Jpn J ClinOncol 47(6):487–493CrossRef Li JH, Shen WZ, Gu XQ et al (2017) Prognostic value of EUS combined with MSCT in predicting the recurrence and metastasis of patients with gastric cancer. Jpn J ClinOncol 47(6):487–493CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Feng XY, Wang W, Luo GY et al (2013) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multislice spiral computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer-results of a single institution study of 610 Chinese patients. PLoS ONE 8(11):e78846CrossRef Feng XY, Wang W, Luo GY et al (2013) Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multislice spiral computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer-results of a single institution study of 610 Chinese patients. PLoS ONE 8(11):e78846CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lei C, Huang L, Wang Y et al (2013) Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer. MolClinOncol 1(4):699–702 Lei C, Huang L, Wang Y et al (2013) Comparison of MRI and endoscope ultrasound detection in preoperative T/N staging of gastric cancer. MolClinOncol 1(4):699–702
42.
go back to reference Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Arcidiacono PG et al (2016) Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography. Gastric Cancer 19(1):216–225CrossRef Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Arcidiacono PG et al (2016) Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography. Gastric Cancer 19(1):216–225CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Yan C, Zhu ZG, Yan M et al (2009) Value of multidetector-row computed tomography in the preoperative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a large-scale Chinese study. J SurgOncol 100(3):205–214 Yan C, Zhu ZG, Yan M et al (2009) Value of multidetector-row computed tomography in the preoperative T and N staging of gastric carcinoma: a large-scale Chinese study. J SurgOncol 100(3):205–214
44.
go back to reference Hj K, Ay K, St O et al (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236(3):879–885CrossRef Hj K, Ay K, St O et al (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236(3):879–885CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Hu YF, Deng ZW, Liu H et al (2016) Staging laparoscopy improves treatment decision-making for advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 22(5):1859–1868CrossRef Hu YF, Deng ZW, Liu H et al (2016) Staging laparoscopy improves treatment decision-making for advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 22(5):1859–1868CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Sun Z, Wang ZN, Zhu GL et al (2010) Advanced gastric cancer with early cancer macroscopic appearance: is it worthy of D2 lymphadenectomy? Ann SurgOncol 17:1278–1290 Sun Z, Wang ZN, Zhu GL et al (2010) Advanced gastric cancer with early cancer macroscopic appearance: is it worthy of D2 lymphadenectomy? Ann SurgOncol 17:1278–1290
Metadata
Title
Potential survival benefits of open over laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients beyond three years after surgery: result from multicenter in-depth analysis based on propensity matching
Authors
Ze-Ning Huang
YuBin Ma
Qi-Yue Chen
Chao-Hui Zheng
Ping Li
Jian-Wei Xie
Jia-Bin Wang
Jian-Xian Lin
Jun Lu
Long-Long Cao
Mi Lin
Ru-Hong Tu
Ju-Li Lin
Hua-Long Zheng
Chang-Ming Huang
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08430-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022 Go to the issue