Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Appendectomy | 2020 SAGES Poster

Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system

Authors: Lavina Malhotra, Elizabeth M. Pontarelli, Gary G. Grinberg, Richard S. Isaacs, James P. Morris, Pandu R. Yenumula

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Healthcare expenditure is on the rise placing greater emphasis on operational excellence, cost containment, and high quality of care. Significant variation is seen in operating room (OR) costs with common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. Surgeons can influence cost through the selection of instrumentation for common surgical procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to quantify the cost of laparoscopic appendectomy in our healthcare system and compare cost variations to operative times and outcomes.

Methods and procedures

We performed a retrospective review of laparoscopic appendectomies in a large regional healthcare system during one-year period (2018). Operating room supply costs and procedure durations were obtained for each hospital. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) outcomes and demographics were compared to the costs for each hospital.

Results

A total of 4757 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed at 20 hospitals (27 to 522 per hospital) by 233 surgeons. The average supply cost per case ranged from $650 to $1067. Individual surgeon cost ranged from $197 to $1181. The average operative time was 41 min (range 33 to 60 min). There was no association between lower cost and longer operative time. The patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between sites. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between high- and low-cost centers. The items with the greatest increase in cost were single-use energy devices (SUD) and endoscopic stapler. We estimate that a saving of over $417 per case is possible by avoiding the use of energy devices and may be as high as $ 984 by adding selective use of staplers. These modifications would result in an annual savings of $1 million for our health system and more than $ 125 million nationwide.

Conclusion

Performing laparoscopic appendectomy with reusable instruments and finding alternatives to expensive energy devices and staplers can significantly decrease costs and does not increase operative time or postoperative complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emanuel E, Tanden N, Altman S, Armstrong S, Berwick D, de Brantes F et al (2012) A systemic approach to containing health care spending. N Engl J Med 367(10):949–954CrossRef Emanuel E, Tanden N, Altman S, Armstrong S, Berwick D, de Brantes F et al (2012) A systemic approach to containing health care spending. N Engl J Med 367(10):949–954CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, Bui AL, Bulchis A, Chapin A et al (2016) US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA 316(24):2627–2646CrossRef Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, Bui AL, Bulchis A, Chapin A et al (2016) US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996–2013. JAMA 316(24):2627–2646CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Norbeck TB (2013) Drivers of health care costs. A physicians foundation white paper–first of a three-part series. Mol. Med. 110(1):30–35 Norbeck TB (2013) Drivers of health care costs. A physicians foundation white paper–first of a three-part series. Mol. Med. 110(1):30–35
4.
go back to reference Brauer DG, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Brunt LM, Jaques DP, Mercurio NR et al (2015) Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization. HPB 17(12):1113–1118CrossRef Brauer DG, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Brunt LM, Jaques DP, Mercurio NR et al (2015) Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization. HPB 17(12):1113–1118CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gitelis M, Vigneswaran Y, Ujiki MB, Denham W, Talamonti M, Muldoon JP et al (2015) Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system’s experience. Am J Surg 209(3):488–492CrossRef Gitelis M, Vigneswaran Y, Ujiki MB, Denham W, Talamonti M, Muldoon JP et al (2015) Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system’s experience. Am J Surg 209(3):488–492CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pontarelli EM, Grinberg GG, Isaacs RS, Morris JP, Ajayi O, Yenumula PR (2019) Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 33(7):2339–2344CrossRef Pontarelli EM, Grinberg GG, Isaacs RS, Morris JP, Ajayi O, Yenumula PR (2019) Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 33(7):2339–2344CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aydogan F, Saribeyoglu K, Simsek O, Salihoglu Z, Carkman S, Salihoglu T et al (2009) Comparison of the electrothermal vessel-sealing system versus endoclip in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(3):375–378CrossRef Aydogan F, Saribeyoglu K, Simsek O, Salihoglu Z, Carkman S, Salihoglu T et al (2009) Comparison of the electrothermal vessel-sealing system versus endoclip in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(3):375–378CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2005) Laparoscopic appendectomy using the LigaSure vessel sealing system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(4):353–356CrossRef Yang HR, Wang YC, Chung PK, Jeng LB, Chen RJ (2005) Laparoscopic appendectomy using the LigaSure vessel sealing system. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(4):353–356CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pogorelic Z, Katic J, Mrklic I, Jeroncic A, Susnjar T, Jukic M et al (2017) Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal). J Surg Res 212:101–107CrossRef Pogorelic Z, Katic J, Mrklic I, Jeroncic A, Susnjar T, Jukic M et al (2017) Lateral thermal damage of mesoappendix and appendiceal base during laparoscopic appendectomy in children: comparison of the harmonic scalpel (Ultracision), bipolar coagulation (LigaSure), and thermal fusion technology (MiSeal). J Surg Res 212:101–107CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jacobs P, Polisena J, Hailey D, Lafferty S (2008) Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29(4):297–301CrossRef Jacobs P, Polisena J, Hailey D, Lafferty S (2008) Economic analysis of reprocessing single-use medical devices: a systematic literature review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29(4):297–301CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Antoniou SA, Mavridis D, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou GA, Gorter R et al (2017) Optimal stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy: a network meta-analysis by the minimally invasive surgery synthesis of interventions and outcomes network. Surgery 162(5):994–1005CrossRef Antoniou SA, Mavridis D, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou GA, Gorter R et al (2017) Optimal stump management in laparoscopic appendectomy: a network meta-analysis by the minimally invasive surgery synthesis of interventions and outcomes network. Surgery 162(5):994–1005CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shaikh FM, Bajwa R, McDonnell CO (2015) Management of appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy–clips or ligature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(1):21–27CrossRef Shaikh FM, Bajwa R, McDonnell CO (2015) Management of appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy–clips or ligature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(1):21–27CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):11–15CrossRef Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK (2009) Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19(1):11–15CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reinke CE, Tabone LE, Fong P, Yoo JS, Park CW (2016) Safety and efficacy of polymeric clips for appendiceal stump closure. JSLS 20(3):e0002016CrossRef Reinke CE, Tabone LE, Fong P, Yoo JS, Park CW (2016) Safety and efficacy of polymeric clips for appendiceal stump closure. JSLS 20(3):e0002016CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hilsden R, Khan N, Vogt K, Schlachta CM (2019) Staplers vs loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective. Surg Endosc 33(10):3419–3424CrossRef Hilsden R, Khan N, Vogt K, Schlachta CM (2019) Staplers vs loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective. Surg Endosc 33(10):3419–3424CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Makaram N, Knight SR, Ibrahim A, Patil P, Wilson MS (2020) Closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review of literature. Ann Med Surg 457:228–235CrossRef Makaram N, Knight SR, Ibrahim A, Patil P, Wilson MS (2020) Closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review of literature. Ann Med Surg 457:228–235CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system
Authors
Lavina Malhotra
Elizabeth M. Pontarelli
Gary G. Grinberg
Richard S. Isaacs
James P. Morris
Pandu R. Yenumula
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Appendectomy
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08266-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2022 Go to the issue