Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019

01-07-2019 | 2018 SAGES Oral

Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Elizabeth M. Pontarelli, Gary G. Grinberg, Richard S. Isaacs, James P. Morris, Olakunle Ajayi, Pandu R. Yenumula

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons in the United States, with approximately 600,000 procedures performed annually. As the cost of care rises, there is increasing emphasis on utilization and quality. Our objective was to evaluate the cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our health system and to compare the operative times and outcomes at high- and low-cost centers.

Methods

We evaluated all laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in our system over a 1-year period. The operating room supply costs and procedure durations were obtained for each of the hospitals. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program outcomes and demographics were compared to the costs for each hospital.

Results

During the study period, 7601 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at 20 hospitals (170–759/hospital) by 227 surgeons. The average cost per case ranged from $296 at the lowest cost center to $658 at the highest cost center. The average operative time varied between sites from 46 to 95 min. There was no association between cost and operative time or case volume. There was a slight trend toward increased cost with higher number of emergency procedures, but this was not well correlated (R2 = 0.03). The patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between sites. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between high- and low-cost centers. The items with the greatest increase in cost were disposable trocars, disposable hook cautery, disposable endoscissors, and disposable clip appliers. We estimate that a savings of over $300/case is possible by using reusable instruments, which would result in an annual savings of $1.3 million for our health system, and $285 million nationwide.

Conclusion

Performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with reusable instruments can significantly decrease costs and does not increase operative time or postoperative complications.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A, Andrews RM (2014) Characteristics of operating room procedures in US hospitals 2011. Rockville Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A, Andrews RM (2014) Characteristics of operating room procedures in US hospitals 2011. Rockville
4.
go back to reference Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169(5):503–506CrossRefPubMed Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169(5):503–506CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Benchmarks. Lap chole supply costs show wide variation (2000). OR Manager 16 (1):30 Benchmarks. Lap chole supply costs show wide variation (2000). OR Manager 16 (1):30
6.
go back to reference Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T (1995) Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 83(6):1138–1144CrossRefPubMed Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, McDonald T (1995) Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 83(6):1138–1144CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brauer DG, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Brunt LM, Jaques DP, Mercurio NR, Hall BL, Fields RC (2015) Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization. HPB (Oxford) 17(12):1113–1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12500 CrossRef Brauer DG, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Brunt LM, Jaques DP, Mercurio NR, Hall BL, Fields RC (2015) Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization. HPB (Oxford) 17(12):1113–1118. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​hpb.​12500 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt CN, Encke A (1995) Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(2–3):147–150PubMed Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt CN, Encke A (1995) Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3(2–3):147–150PubMed
20.
go back to reference Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U (1995) Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(6):1812–1815CrossRefPubMed Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U (1995) Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(6):1812–1815CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Demoulin L, Kesteloot K, Penninckx F (1996) A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10(5):520–525CrossRefPubMed Demoulin L, Kesteloot K, Penninckx F (1996) A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 10(5):520–525CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Regional cost analysis for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Elizabeth M. Pontarelli
Gary G. Grinberg
Richard S. Isaacs
James P. Morris
Olakunle Ajayi
Pandu R. Yenumula
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6526-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2019 Go to the issue