Top

Published in:

01-01-2021 | Coronavirus | New Technology

Stop the leak!: Mitigating potential exposure of aerosolized COVID-19 during laparoscopic surgery

Authors: John M. Uecker, Austin Fagerberg, Naser Ahmad, Alexander Cohen, Mitchell Gilkey, Farshid Alembeigi, Christopher R. Idelson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Viral particles have been shown to aerosolize into insufflated gas during laparoscopic surgery. In the operating room, this potentially exposes personnel to aerosolized viruses as well as carcinogens. In light of circumstances surrounding COVID-19 and a concern for the safety of healthcare professionals, our study seeks to quantify the volumes of gas leaked from dynamic interactions between laparoscopic instruments and the trocar port to better understand potential exposure to surgically aerosolized particles.

Methods

A custom setup was constructed to simulate an insufflated laparoscopic surgical cavity. Two surgical instrument use scenarios were examined to observe and quantify opportunities for insufflation gas leakage. Both scenarios considered multiple configurations of instrument and trocar port sizes/dimensions: (1) the full insertion and full removal of a laparoscopic instrument from the port and (2) the movement of the scope within the port, recognized as “dynamic interaction”, which occurs nearly 100% of the time over the course of any procedure.

Results

For a 5 mm instrument in a 5 mm trocar, the average volume of gas leaked during dynamic interaction and full insertion/removal scenarios were 43.67 and 25.97 mL of gas, respectively. Volume of gas leaked for a 5 mm instrument in a 12 mm port averaged 41.32 mL and 29.47 for dynamic interaction vs. instrument insertion and removal. Similar patterns were shown with a 10 mm instrument in 12 mm port, with 55.68 mL for the dynamic interaction and 58.59 for the instrument insertion/removal.

Conclusions

Dynamic interactions and insertion/removal events between laparoscopic instruments and ports appear to contribute to consistent leakage of insufflated gas into the OR. Any measures possible taken to reduce OR gas leakage should be considered in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Minimizing laparoscope and instrument removal and replacement would be one strategy to mitigate gas leakage during laparoscopic surgery.

Burrer SL, de Perio MA, Hughes MM, Kuhar DT, Luckhaupt SE, McDaniel CJ, Porter RM, Silk B, Stuckey MJ, Walters M (2020) Characteristics of Health Care Personnel with COVID-19—United States, February 12–April 9, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69:477–481. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e6CrossRef

Francis N, Dort J, Cho E, Feldman L, Keller D, Lim R, Mikami D, Phillips E, Spaniolas K, Tsuda S, Wasco K, Arulampalam T, Sheraz M, Morales S, Pietrabissa A, Asbun H, Pryor A (2020) SAGES and EAES recommendations for minimally invasive surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. Surg Endosc 34:2327–2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07565-wCrossRef

COVID-19: Recommendations for Management of Elective Surgical Procedures. https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-surgery. Accessed 6 Jun 2020

Porter J, Blau E, Gharagozloo F, Martino M, Cerfolio R, Duvvuri U, Caceres A, Badani K, Bhayani S, Collins J, Coelho R, Rocco B, Wiklund P, Nathan S, Parra-Davila E, Ortiz-Ortiz C, Maes K, Dasgupta P, Patel V (2020) Society of robotic surgery review: recommendations regarding the risk of COVID-19 transmission during minimally invasive surgery. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

COVID-19: Joint Statement on Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery - AAGL » AAGL. https://www.aagl.org/news/covid-19-joint-statement-on-minimally-invasive-gynecologic-surgery/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTWpnek9URTROemd4WldKayIsInQiOiJHeWRYUWVwVHhORmx0Smpod3pOc1RxT2pqN05HbFFMb0tWVjlJZDhMcHplUm9uOGMyTGZNcW1uelNGaFwvSitYQnY1a2EyVzV0QnAyRlNlcURnQVwvTzZcL3oraGt3alVlUDk4UjNnd0lcL3Z1T2l2cVwvcnlUTW82SExmM3hlR0NPakNZIn0%3D. Accessed 6 Jun 2020

Kimmig R, Verheijen RHM, Rudnicki M (2020) Robot assisted surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for gynecological cancer: a statement of the society of European robotic gynaecological surgery (SERGS). J Gynecol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

ESGE Recommendations for Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgery for COVID-19 Outbreak

EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) guidelines during COVID-19 emergency | Uroweb. https://uroweb.org/eau-robotic-urology-section-erus-guidelines-during-covid-19-emergency/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTWpnek9URTROemd4WldKayIsInQiOiJHeWRYUWVwVHhORmx0Smpod3pOc1RxT2pqN05HbFFMb0tWVjlJZDhMcHplUm9uOGMyTGZNcW1uelNGaFwvSitYQnY1a2EyVzV0QnAyRlNlcURnQVwvTzZcL3oraGt3alVlUDk4UjNnd0lcL3Z1T2l2cVwvcnlUTW82SExmM3hlR0NPakNZIn0%3D. Accessed 6 Jun 2020

Forrester JD, Nassar AK, Maggio PM, Hawn MT (2020) Precautions for operating room team members during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Surg 230:1098–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.030CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Mintz Y, Arezzo A, Boni L, Chand M, Brodie R, Fingerhut A (2020) A low cost, safe and effective method for smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery for suspected coronavirus patients. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003965CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Vigneswaran Y, Prachand VN, Posner MC, Matthews JB, Hussain M (2020) What is the appropriate use of laparoscopy over open procedures in the current COVID climate. J Gastrointest Surg. 10.1007/s11605-020-04592-9

12.

Li Y, Leung GM, Tang JW, Yang X, Chao CYH, Lin JZ, Lu JW, Nielsen PV, Niu J, Qian H, Sleigh AC, Su HJJ, Sundell J, Wong TW, Yuen PL (2007) Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment—a multidisciplinary systematic review. Indoor Air 17:2–18CrossRef

13.

Garden JM, Kerry O’Banion M, Bakus AD, Olson C (2002) Viral disease transmitted by laser-generated plume (aerosol). Arch Dermatol 138:1303–1307. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.138.10.1303CrossRefPubMed

14.

AA Aliabadi SRKBSG (2011) Preventing airborne disease transmission: review of methods for ventilation Design in Health Care Facilities. Adv Prev Med 2011:124064. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/124064CrossRef

15.

Tellier R, Li Y, Cowling BJ, Tang JW (2019) Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis 19:101CrossRef

16.

Tang JW, Li Y, Eames I, Chan PKS, Ridgway GL (2006) Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J Hosp Infect 64:100–114CrossRef

17.

Jewett DL, Heinsohn P, Bennett C, Rosen A, Neuilly C (1992) Blood-containing aerosols generated by surgical techniques: a possible infectious hazard. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53:228–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669291359564CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kwak HD, Kim SH, Seo YS, Song KJ (2016) Detecting hepatitis B virus in surgical smoke emitted during laparoscopic surgery. Occup Environ Med 73:857–863. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103724CrossRefPubMed

19.

Weyandt GH, Tollmann F, Kristen P, Weissbrich B (2011) Low risk of contamination with human papilloma virus during treatment of condylomata acuminata with multilayer argon plasma coagulation and CO 2 laser ablation. Arch Dermatol Res 303:141–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-010-1119-3CrossRefPubMed

20.

Resources for Smoke & Gas Evacuation During Open, Laparoscopic, and Endoscopic Procedures—SAGES. https://www.sages.org/resources-smoke-gas-evacuation-during-open-laparoscopic-endoscopic-procedures/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTWpnek9URTROemd4WldKayIsInQiOiJHeWRYUWVwVHhORmx0Smpod3pOc1RxT2pqN05HbFFMb0tWVjlJZDhMcHplUm9uOGMyTGZNcW1uelNGaFwvSitYQnY1a2EyVzV0QnAyRlNlcURnQVwvTzZcL3oraGt3alVlUDk4UjNnd0lcL3Z1T2l2cVwvcnlUTW82SExmM3hlR0NPakNZIn0%3D. Accessed 6 Jun 2020

21.

Ferenczy A, Bergeron C, Richart RM (1990) Human papillomavirus DNA in CO2 laser-generated plume of smoke and its consequences to the surgeon. Obstet Gynecol 75:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(89)90871-8CrossRefPubMed

22.

Manson LT, Damrose EJ (2013) Does exposure to laser plume place the surgeon at high risk for acquiring clinical human papillomavirus infection? Laryngoscope 123:1319–1320CrossRef

23.

Ulmer B (1998) Occupational Safety and Health Administration acts on guidelines for electrosurgical smoke. AORN J 67:1244–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62612-4CrossRefPubMed

24.

Alp E, Bijl D, Bleichrodt RP, Hansson B, Voss A (2006) Surgical smoke and infection control. J Hosp Infect 62:1–5CrossRef

25.

Bendifallah S, Salakos E, Naoura I, Aristizabal P, Furet E, Zilberman S, Ballester M, Darai E (2018) Prospective, randomized comparison of the use of FloShield Air System ® versus the reference technique (water + povidone-iodine solution) during gynecologic endoscopic surgery to evaluate the operative lens vision quality. Surg Endosc 32:1593–1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5642-6CrossRefPubMed

26.

Workman AD, Welling DB, Carter BS, Curry WT, Holbrook EH, Gray ST, Scangas GA, Bleier BS (2020) Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID-19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Gallo O, Locatello LG (2020) Laser-assisted head and neck surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic: controversial evidence and precautions. Head Neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Liu Y, Song Y, Hu X, Yan L, Zhu X (2019) Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists. J Cancer 10:2788–2799CrossRef

29.

Fitzgerald JEF, Malik M, Ahmed I (2012) A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 26:337–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1872-1CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hwan Choi S, Gyun Kwon T, Kwang Chung S, Kim T-H (2013) Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3472-3CrossRef

31.

Transmission of COVID-19. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/latest-evidence/transmission. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

32.

Memoli MJ, Czajkowski L, Reed S, Athota R, Bristol T, Proudfoot K, Fargis S, Stein M, Dunfee RL, Shaw PA, Davey RT, Taubenberger JK (2015) Validation of the wild-type influenza a human challenge model H1N1pdMIST: an A(H1N1) pdm09 dose-finding investigational new drug study. Clin Infect Dis 60:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu924CrossRefPubMed

33.

Pujadas E, Chaudhry F, McBride R, Richter F, Zhao S, Wajnberg A, Nadkarni G, Glicksberg BS, Houldsworth J, Cordon-Cardo C (2020) SARS-CoV-2 viral load predicts COVID-19 mortality. Lancet Respir Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30354-4CrossRefPubMed

34.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load and the severity of COVID-19 - CEBM. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/sars-cov-2-viral-load-and-the-severity-of-covid-19/. Accessed 29 Aug 2020

35.

Jacobs VR, Morrison JE, Mettler L, Mundhenke C, Jonat W (1999) Measurement of CO2 hypothermia during laparoscopy and pelviscopy: how cold it gets and how to prevent it. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(99)80063-2CrossRefPubMed

36.

Stotz L, Joukhadar R, Hamza A, Thangarajah F, Bardens D, Juhasz-Böss I, Solomayer EF, Radosa MP, Radosa JC (2018) Instrument usage in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a prospective clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298:773–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4867-5CrossRefPubMed

37.

Sutton E, Youssef Y, Meenaghan N, Godinez C, Xiao Y, Lee T, Dexter D, Park A (2010) Gaze disruptions experienced by the laparoscopic operating surgeon. Surg Endosc 24:1240–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0753-3CrossRefPubMed

38.

Geryane MH, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2004) Time-motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents. Surg Endosc 18:1597–1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02637127CrossRefPubMed

39.

Altintoprak F, Akin E, Gundogdu K, Dikicier E (2018) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: technical details, pitfalls and current results. In: Hernia Surgery and Recent Developments. InTech

40.

Allers JC, Hussein AA, Ahmad N, Cavuoto L, Wing JF, Hayes RM, Hinata N, Bisantz AM, Guru KA (2016) Evaluation and impact of workflow interruptions during robot-assisted surgery. Urology 92:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.040CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lawrentschuk N, Fleshner N, Bolton D (2010) Laparoscopic lens fogging: a review of etiology and methods to maintain a clear visual field. J Endourol 24:905–913CrossRef

42.

Manning T, Perera M, Chistidis D, Kinnear N (2017) Visual occlusion during minimally invasive surgery: a contemporary review of methods to reduce laparoscopic and robotic lens fogging and other sources of optical loss. J Endourol 31:327–333CrossRef

43.

Yong N, Grange P, Eldred-Evans D (2016) Impact of laparoscopic lens contamination in operating theaters: a study on the frequency and duration of lens contamination and commonly utilized techniques to maintain clear vision. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 26:286–289. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000289CrossRef

44.

Russell RCG (1993) General surgery: biliary surgery. Br Med J 307:1266–1269CrossRef

45.

Providence, Ascension post losses in Q1 as COVID-19 causes drop in patient admissions | FierceHealthcare. https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals-health-systems/providence-ascension-post-losses-q1-as-covid-19-causes-drop-patient. Accessed 10 Jun 2020

Title: Stop the leak!: Mitigating potential exposure of aerosolized COVID-19 during laparoscopic surgery
Authors: John M. Uecker
Austin Fagerberg
Naser Ahmad
Alexander Cohen
Mitchell Gilkey
Farshid Alembeigi
Christopher R. Idelson
Publication date: 01-01-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Coronavirus
Laparoscopy
COVID-19
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08006-4

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Stop the leak!: Mitigating potential exposure of aerosolized COVID-19 during laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Preoperative skill evaluation in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair using a three-dimensional printed TAPP repair simulator

Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Predictive factors of post-laparoscopic inguinal hernia acute and chronic pain: prospective follow-up of 807 patients from a single experienced surgeon

Laparoscopic fundoplication for refractory GERD: a procedure worth repeating if needed

Intractable biliary obstruction after TIPS creation treated by magnet-assisted endoscopic biliary-duodenal anastomosis

The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs—a qualitative review of the literature