Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2018

01-10-2018 | General Gynecology

Instrument usage in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a prospective clinical trial

Authors: Lisa Stotz, Ralf Joukhadar, Amr Hamza, Fabinshy Thangarajah, David Bardens, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Marc P. Radosa, Julia C. Radosa

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate instrumental usage in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries and to develop key timesets of a laparoscopic operation, which allows categorization of the operation time into different sections.

Methods

In this prospective clinical observational study, frequency of instrument usage, time for instrument switches, and instrument utilization time were recorded in a standardized manner for laparoscopic surgeries in 103 endoscopic surgeries.

Results

A standard equipment (including atraumatic grasping forceps, irrigation and suction device, bipolar clamp, and laparoscopic scissors) was used for nearly all interventions. Bipolar clamps and scissors were changed most frequently. The tool used for the longest amount of time was the atraumatic grasping forceps. Laparoscopic instruments were switched 51 times per surgery (range 2–250 times). One instrument switch lasted for a median of 0.13 min (0.08–1.2 min). Median time for instrument switch for a single surgery added up to 6.83 min. Instrument switches required 10.5% of the overall operation time.

Conclusion

We analyzed the current instrument usage in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries. The results of our standardized investigation suggest ways to reduce the time required for surgery and provide starting points for the standardization of the work routine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Neis KJ, Brandner P, Wagner S (2006) Laparoskopische Operationsverfahren in der Gynäkologie. Gynäkologe 39:87–104CrossRef Neis KJ, Brandner P, Wagner S (2006) Laparoskopische Operationsverfahren in der Gynäkologie. Gynäkologe 39:87–104CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Becker S, Abele H, Brucker S, Fehm T, Gardanis K, Wallwiener D et al (2011) Laparoskopie - Endoskopie. In: Kreienberg R, Ludwig H (eds) 125 Jahre Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe - Werte-Wissen-Wandel. Springer Medizin, Berlin, pp 141–179CrossRef Becker S, Abele H, Brucker S, Fehm T, Gardanis K, Wallwiener D et al (2011) Laparoskopie - Endoskopie. In: Kreienberg R, Ludwig H (eds) 125 Jahre Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe - Werte-Wissen-Wandel. Springer Medizin, Berlin, pp 141–179CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cravello L, de Montgolfier R, D’Ercole C, Roger V, Blanc B (1997) Endoscopic surgery. The end of classic surgery? J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 75:103–106CrossRef Cravello L, de Montgolfier R, D’Ercole C, Roger V, Blanc B (1997) Endoscopic surgery. The end of classic surgery? J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 75:103–106CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422CrossRefPubMed Wattiez A, Cohen SB, Selvaggi L (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:417–422CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Juhasz-Böss I, Haggag H, Baum S, Kerl S, Rody A, Solomayer E et al (2012) Laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches for endometrial cancer treatment: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:167–172CrossRefPubMed Juhasz-Böss I, Haggag H, Baum S, Kerl S, Rody A, Solomayer E et al (2012) Laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches for endometrial cancer treatment: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:167–172CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Richardson R, Bournas N, Magos A (1995) Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet 345(8941):36–41CrossRefPubMed Richardson R, Bournas N, Magos A (1995) Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet 345(8941):36–41CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330:1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R (2005) Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 330:1478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kunde D, Welch C (2003) Ultracision in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 23:347–352CrossRef Kunde D, Welch C (2003) Ultracision in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol 23:347–352CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ortega J, Sala C, Flor B, Liedo S (2004) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Ultracision harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: an analysis of 200 cases in a randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:9–12CrossRefPubMed Ortega J, Sala C, Flor B, Liedo S (2004) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Ultracision harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: an analysis of 200 cases in a randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:9–12CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hessler PA (2008) Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Effektivität verschiedener instrumenteller Operationstechniken bei der totalen laparoskopischen Hysterektomie (TLH). Geburtsh Frauenheilk 68:77–82CrossRef Hessler PA (2008) Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Effektivität verschiedener instrumenteller Operationstechniken bei der totalen laparoskopischen Hysterektomie (TLH). Geburtsh Frauenheilk 68:77–82CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Radosa JC, Radosa CG, Mavrova R, Wagenpfeil S, Hamza A, Joukhadar R et al (2016) Postoperative quality of life and sexual function in premenopausal women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic fibroids: a prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One 11(11):e0166659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Radosa JC, Radosa CG, Mavrova R, Wagenpfeil S, Hamza A, Joukhadar R et al (2016) Postoperative quality of life and sexual function in premenopausal women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic fibroids: a prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One 11(11):e0166659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Radosa JC, Radosa MP, Mavorva R, Rudy A, Juhasz-Böss I, Bardens D et al (2013) Five minutes of extended assisted ventilation with an open umbilical trocar valve significantly reduces postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Obstes Gynecol Reprod Biol 171:122–127CrossRef Radosa JC, Radosa MP, Mavorva R, Rudy A, Juhasz-Böss I, Bardens D et al (2013) Five minutes of extended assisted ventilation with an open umbilical trocar valve significantly reduces postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Eur J Obstes Gynecol Reprod Biol 171:122–127CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Radosa JC, Meyber-Solomayer G, Kastle C, Radosa CG, Mavrova R, Gräber S et al (2014) Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients’ postoperative sexual function and quality of life. J Sex Med 11:2342–2350CrossRefPubMed Radosa JC, Meyber-Solomayer G, Kastle C, Radosa CG, Mavrova R, Gräber S et al (2014) Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients’ postoperative sexual function and quality of life. J Sex Med 11:2342–2350CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Geryane MH, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2004) Time-motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents. Surg Endosc 18:1597–1600PubMed Geryane MH, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2004) Time-motion analysis of operation theater time use during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by surgical specialist residents. Surg Endosc 18:1597–1600PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kranzfelder M, Schneider A, Fiolka A, Schwan E, Gillen S, Wilhelm D et al (2013) Real-time instrument detection in minimally invasive surgery using radiofrequency identification technology. J Surg Res 185:704–710CrossRefPubMed Kranzfelder M, Schneider A, Fiolka A, Schwan E, Gillen S, Wilhelm D et al (2013) Real-time instrument detection in minimally invasive surgery using radiofrequency identification technology. J Surg Res 185:704–710CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brucker S, Rothmund R, Krämer B, Neis F, Schönfisch B, Zubke W et al (2013) Cervical detachment using monopolar SupraLoop™ electrode versus monopolar needle in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH): an interventional, comparative cohort study. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 73:1121–1127CrossRefPubMed Brucker S, Rothmund R, Krämer B, Neis F, Schönfisch B, Zubke W et al (2013) Cervical detachment using monopolar SupraLoop™ electrode versus monopolar needle in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH): an interventional, comparative cohort study. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 73:1121–1127CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, Schirmeier A, Chopra S et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments. Surg Endosc 26:2541–2549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seehofer D, Mogl M, Boas-Knoop S, Unger J, Schirmeier A, Chopra S et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of new integrated bipolar and ultrasonic scissors compared to conventional laparoscopic 5-mm sealing and cutting instruments. Surg Endosc 26:2541–2549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Metadata
Title
Instrument usage in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a prospective clinical trial
Authors
Lisa Stotz
Ralf Joukhadar
Amr Hamza
Fabinshy Thangarajah
David Bardens
Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
Erich-Franz Solomayer
Marc P. Radosa
Julia C. Radosa
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4867-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2018 Go to the issue