Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Consensus Statement

Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum

Authors: Yuman Fong, Joseph F. Buell, Justin Collins, John Martinie, Christiane Bruns, Allan Tsung, Pierre-Alain Clavien, Ido Nachmany, Bjørn Edwin, Johann Pratschke, Evgeny Solomonov, Alfred Koenigsrainer, Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) procedures are performed worldwide and establishing processes for safe adoption of this technology is essential for patient benefit. We report results of the Delphi process to define and optimize robotic training procedures for HPB surgeons.

Methods

In 2019, a robotic HPB surgery panel with an interest in surgical training from the Americas and Europe was created and met. An e-consensus–finding exercise using the Delphi process was applied and consensus was defined as 80% agreement on each question. Iterations of anonymous voting continued over three rounds.

Results

Members agreed on several points: there was need for a standardized robotic training curriculum for HPB surgery that considers experience of surgeons and based on a robotic hepatectomy includes a common approach for “basic robotic skills” training (e-learning module, including hardware description, patient selection, port placement, docking, troubleshooting, fundamentals of robotic surgery, team training and efficiency, and emergencies) and an “advanced technical skills curriculum” (e-learning, including patient selection information, cognitive skills, and recommended operative equipment lists). A modular approach to index procedures should be used with video demonstrations, port placement for index procedure, troubleshooting, and emergency scenario management information. Inexperienced surgeons should undergo training in basic robotic skills and console proficiency, transitioning to full procedure training of e-learning (video demonstration, simulation training, case observation, and final evaluation). Experienced surgeons should undergo basic training when using a new system (e-learning, dry lab, and operating room (OR) team training, virtual reality modules, and wet lab; case observations were unnecessary for basic training) and should complete the advanced index procedural robotic curriculum with assessment by wet lab, case observation, and OR team training.

Conclusions

Optimization and standardization of training and education of HPB surgeons in robotic procedures was agreed upon. Results are being incorporated into future curriculum for education in robotic surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, Sun V, Lee B, Singh G, Fong Y (2018) Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:77–84PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, Sun V, Lee B, Singh G, Fong Y (2018) Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:77–84PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ryska MF, Rudis J, Jurenka B, Langer D, Pudil J (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85:511–516PubMed Ryska MF, Rudis J, Jurenka B, Langer D, Pudil J (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85:511–516PubMed
5.
go back to reference Goh BKP, Lee LS, Lee SY, Chow PKH, Chan CY, Chiow AKH (2019) Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 89:201–205PubMedCrossRef Goh BKP, Lee LS, Lee SY, Chow PKH, Chan CY, Chiow AKH (2019) Initial experience with robotic hepatectomy in Singapore: analysis of 48 resections in 43 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 89:201–205PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Hagendoorn J (2017) Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6:239–245PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Hagendoorn J (2017) Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6:239–245PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Chou WH, Lai HS, Liang JT, Lee PH, Wu YM (2017) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, Chou WH, Lai HS, Liang JT, Lee PH, Wu YM (2017) Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1021–1028PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, Marsh W, Reddy SK, Bartlett DL (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555PubMedCrossRef Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, Sabbaghian S, Tohme S, Steel J, Marsh W, Reddy SK, Bartlett DL (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Benedetti E (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146:844–850PubMedCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, Bianco FM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Benedetti E (2011) Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg 146:844–850PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lyman WB, Passeri M, Sastry A, Cochran A, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Baker EH, Martinie JB (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center. Surg Endosc 33:2991–3000PubMedCrossRef Lyman WB, Passeri M, Sastry A, Cochran A, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Baker EH, Martinie JB (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center. Surg Endosc 33:2991–3000PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference de Mesquita Neto JWB, Macedo FI, Liu Y, Yiengpruksawan A (2019) Fully robotic total pancreatectomy: technical aspects and outcomes. J Robot Surg 13:77–82PubMedCrossRef de Mesquita Neto JWB, Macedo FI, Liu Y, Yiengpruksawan A (2019) Fully robotic total pancreatectomy: technical aspects and outcomes. J Robot Surg 13:77–82PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 17:580–586CrossRef Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, Choudry HA, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford) 17:580–586CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jung JP, Zenati MS, Hamad A, Hogg ME, Simmons RL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Boone BA (2019) Can post-hoc video review of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy predict portal/superior mesenteric vein margin status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma? HPB (Oxford) 21:679–686CrossRef Jung JP, Zenati MS, Hamad A, Hogg ME, Simmons RL, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Boone BA (2019) Can post-hoc video review of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy predict portal/superior mesenteric vein margin status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma? HPB (Oxford) 21:679–686CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2020) Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 34:377–383PubMedCrossRef Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2020) Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 34:377–383PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2018) Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e13000CrossRef Shyr BU, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2018) Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e13000CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422PubMedCrossRef Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH (2015) Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg 150:416–422PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, Gheza F, Fernandes E, Masrur MA, Gangemi A, Bianco FM (2018) Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique : lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 32:4329–4336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Giulianotti PC, Mangano A, Bustos RE, Gheza F, Fernandes E, Masrur MA, Gangemi A, Bianco FM (2018) Operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique : lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001. Surg Endosc 32:4329–4336PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fong Y, Yanghee W, Hyung W, Lau C, Strong V (2018) The SAGES Atlas of robotic surgery, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, New YorkCrossRef Fong Y, Yanghee W, Hyung W, Lau C, Strong V (2018) The SAGES Atlas of robotic surgery, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, New YorkCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Awad M, Awad F, Carter F, Jervis B, Buzink S, Foster J, Jakimowicz J, Francis NK (2018) Consensus views on the optimum training curriculum for advanced minimally invasive surgery: a Delphi study. Int J Surg (London, England) 53:137–142CrossRef Awad M, Awad F, Carter F, Jervis B, Buzink S, Foster J, Jakimowicz J, Francis NK (2018) Consensus views on the optimum training curriculum for advanced minimally invasive surgery: a Delphi study. Int J Surg (London, England) 53:137–142CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H, Karachun A, Kim SH, Law WL, Marks J, Morino M, Panis Y, Uriburu JC, Wexner SD, Parvaiz A (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261:716–722PubMedCrossRef Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H, Karachun A, Kim SH, Law WL, Marks J, Morino M, Panis Y, Uriburu JC, Wexner SD, Parvaiz A (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261:716–722PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Palter VN, Graafland M, Schijven MP, Grantcharov TP (2012) Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. Surgery 151:391–397PubMedCrossRef Palter VN, Graafland M, Schijven MP, Grantcharov TP (2012) Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach. Surgery 151:391–397PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Petz W, Spinoglio G, Choi GS, Parvaiz A, Santiago C, Marecik S, Giulianotti PC, Bianchi PP (2016) Structured training and competence assessment in colorectal robotic surgery. Results of a consensus experts round table. Int J Med Robot 12:634–641PubMedCrossRef Petz W, Spinoglio G, Choi GS, Parvaiz A, Santiago C, Marecik S, Giulianotti PC, Bianchi PP (2016) Structured training and competence assessment in colorectal robotic surgery. Results of a consensus experts round table. Int J Med Robot 12:634–641PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Husslein H, Bjerrum F, Sorensen JL, Grantcharov TP (2015) Designing a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a Delphi approach. J Grad Med Educ 7:197–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shore EM, Lefebvre GG, Husslein H, Bjerrum F, Sorensen JL, Grantcharov TP (2015) Designing a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a Delphi approach. J Grad Med Educ 7:197–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Singh P, Aggarwal R, Zevin B, Grantcharov T, Darzi A (2014) A global Delphi consensus study on defining and measuring quality in surgical training. J Am Coll Surg 219(346–353):e347 Singh P, Aggarwal R, Zevin B, Grantcharov T, Darzi A (2014) A global Delphi consensus study on defining and measuring quality in surgical training. J Am Coll Surg 219(346–353):e347
27.
go back to reference Tremblay C, Grantcharov T, Urquia ML, Satkunaratnam A (2014) Assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi consensus survey among international experts. J Obst Gynaecol 36:1014–1023 Tremblay C, Grantcharov T, Urquia ML, Satkunaratnam A (2014) Assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi consensus survey among international experts. J Obst Gynaecol 36:1014–1023
28.
go back to reference Zevin B, Levy JS, Satava RM, Grantcharov TP (2012) A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(580–586):e583 Zevin B, Levy JS, Satava RM, Grantcharov TP (2012) A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. J Am Coll Surg 215(580–586):e583
29.
go back to reference Fard MJ, Ameri S, Darin Ellis R, Chinnam RB, Pandya AK, Klein MD (2018) Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: predictive analytics approach. Int J Med Robot 14:1850CrossRef Fard MJ, Ameri S, Darin Ellis R, Chinnam RB, Pandya AK, Klein MD (2018) Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: predictive analytics approach. Int J Med Robot 14:1850CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187:247–252PubMedCrossRef Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187:247–252PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hopmans CJ, den Hoed PT, van der Laan L, van der Harst E, van der Elst M, Mannaerts GH, Dawson I, Timman R, Wijnhoven BP (2014) Assessment of surgery residents' operative skills in the operating theater using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a prospective multicenter study. Surgery 156:1078–1088PubMedCrossRef Hopmans CJ, den Hoed PT, van der Laan L, van der Harst E, van der Elst M, Mannaerts GH, Dawson I, Timman R, Wijnhoven BP (2014) Assessment of surgery residents' operative skills in the operating theater using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS): a prospective multicenter study. Surgery 156:1078–1088PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Knight S, Aggarwal R, Agostini A, Loundou A, Berdah S, Crochet P (2018) Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator. PLoS ONE 13:e0190580PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Knight S, Aggarwal R, Agostini A, Loundou A, Berdah S, Crochet P (2018) Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator. PLoS ONE 13:e0190580PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Polin MR, Siddiqui NY, Comstock BA, Hesham H, Brown C, Lendvay TS, Martino MA (2016) Crowdsourcing: a valid alternative to expert evaluation of robotic surgery skills. Am J Obst Gynecol 215:644CrossRef Polin MR, Siddiqui NY, Comstock BA, Hesham H, Brown C, Lendvay TS, Martino MA (2016) Crowdsourcing: a valid alternative to expert evaluation of robotic surgery skills. Am J Obst Gynecol 215:644CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP, Rehman S, Sharif M, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Kesavadas T, Kaouk J, Guru KA (2014) Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum–a multi-institution prospective study. J Surg Educ 71:316–324PubMedCrossRef Raza SJ, Froghi S, Chowriappa A, Ahmed K, Field E, Stegemann AP, Rehman S, Sharif M, Shi Y, Wilding GE, Kesavadas T, Kaouk J, Guru KA (2014) Construct validation of the key components of Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery (FSRS) curriculum–a multi-institution prospective study. J Surg Educ 71:316–324PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sanchez R, Rodriguez O, Rosciano J, Vegas L, Bond V, Rojas A, Sanchez-Ismayel A (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10:227–231PubMedCrossRef Sanchez R, Rodriguez O, Rosciano J, Vegas L, Bond V, Rojas A, Sanchez-Ismayel A (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10:227–231PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Nagle AP, Rooney DM, Hungness ES (2012) Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale. Surg Endosc 26:2403–2415PubMedCrossRef Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Nagle AP, Rooney DM, Hungness ES (2012) Development and evaluation of a laparoscopic common bile duct exploration simulator and procedural rating scale. Surg Endosc 26:2403–2415PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2014) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10:379–384PubMedCrossRef Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2014) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10:379–384PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Suh I, Mukherjee M, Oleynikov D, Siu KC (2011) Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robot 7:327–333PubMed Suh I, Mukherjee M, Oleynikov D, Siu KC (2011) Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery. Int J Med Robot 7:327–333PubMed
39.
go back to reference Tou S, Bergamaschi R, Heald RJ, Parvaiz A (2015) Structured training in robotic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 17:185PubMedCrossRef Tou S, Bergamaschi R, Heald RJ, Parvaiz A (2015) Structured training in robotic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 17:185PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference White LW, Kowalewski TM, Dockter RL, Comstock B, Hannaford B, Lendvay TS (2015) Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skill: a valid method for discriminating basic robotic surgery skills. J Endourol 29:1295–1301PubMedCrossRef White LW, Kowalewski TM, Dockter RL, Comstock B, Hannaford B, Lendvay TS (2015) Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skill: a valid method for discriminating basic robotic surgery skills. J Endourol 29:1295–1301PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Zevin B, Bonrath EM, Aggarwal R, Dedy NJ, Ahmed N, Grantcharov TP (2013) Development, feasibility, validity, and reliability of a scale for objective assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. J Am Coll Surg 216:955–965PubMedCrossRef Zevin B, Bonrath EM, Aggarwal R, Dedy NJ, Ahmed N, Grantcharov TP (2013) Development, feasibility, validity, and reliability of a scale for objective assessment of operative performance in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. J Am Coll Surg 216:955–965PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Veronesi G, Dorn P, Dunning J, Cardillo G, Schmid RA, Collins J, Baste JM, Limmer S, Shahin GMM, Egberts JH, Pardolesi A, Meacci E, Stamenkovic S, Casali G, Rueckert JC, Taurchini M, Santelmo N, Melfi F, Toker A (2018) Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 53:1173–1179PubMedCrossRef Veronesi G, Dorn P, Dunning J, Cardillo G, Schmid RA, Collins J, Baste JM, Limmer S, Shahin GMM, Egberts JH, Pardolesi A, Meacci E, Stamenkovic S, Casali G, Rueckert JC, Taurchini M, Santelmo N, Melfi F, Toker A (2018) Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 53:1173–1179PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540–544PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540–544PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg 12:1709–1716PubMedCrossRef Eppsteiner RW, Csikesz NG, Simons JP, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center? J Gastrointest Surg 12:1709–1716PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Dusch N, Lietzmann A, Barthels F, Niedergethmann M, Ruckert F, Wilhelm TJ (2017) International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definitions for Postpancreatectomy Complications: Applicability at a High-Volume Center. Scand J Surg 106:216–223PubMedCrossRef Dusch N, Lietzmann A, Barthels F, Niedergethmann M, Ruckert F, Wilhelm TJ (2017) International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definitions for Postpancreatectomy Complications: Applicability at a High-Volume Center. Scand J Surg 106:216–223PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Belyansky I, Swan RZ, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Iannitti DA, Heniford BT (2014) Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA. J Gastrointest Surg 18:532–541PubMedCrossRef Colavita PD, Tsirline VB, Belyansky I, Swan RZ, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Iannitti DA, Heniford BT (2014) Regionalization and outcomes of hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer surgery in USA. J Gastrointest Surg 18:532–541PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM (2017) Evaluating trends in the volume-outcomes relationship following liver surgery: does regionalization benefit all patients the same? J Gastrointest Surg 21:463–471PubMedCrossRef Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM (2017) Evaluating trends in the volume-outcomes relationship following liver surgery: does regionalization benefit all patients the same? J Gastrointest Surg 21:463–471PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Luglio G, Nelson H (2010) Laparoscopy for colon cancer: state of the art. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:777–791PubMedCrossRef Luglio G, Nelson H (2010) Laparoscopy for colon cancer: state of the art. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:777–791PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM (2008) Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 248:721–727PubMedCrossRef Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM (2008) Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 248:721–727PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Stroh C, Kockerling F, Volker L, Frank B, Stefanie W, Christian K, Christiane B, Thomas M, Obesity Surgery Working Group CNO (2016) Results of more than 11,800 sleeve gastrectomies: data analysis of the german bariatric surgery registry. Ann Surg 263:949–955PubMedCrossRef Stroh C, Kockerling F, Volker L, Frank B, Stefanie W, Christian K, Christiane B, Thomas M, Obesity Surgery Working Group CNO (2016) Results of more than 11,800 sleeve gastrectomies: data analysis of the german bariatric surgery registry. Ann Surg 263:949–955PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Blute ML, Prestipino AL (2014) Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume. Ann Surg 259:7–9PubMedCrossRef Blute ML, Prestipino AL (2014) Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume. Ann Surg 259:7–9PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Stewart CL, Ituarte PHG, Melstrom KA, Warner SG, Melstrom LG, Lai LL, Fong Y, Woo Y (2019) Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 33:2591–2601PubMedCrossRef Stewart CL, Ituarte PHG, Melstrom KA, Warner SG, Melstrom LG, Lai LL, Fong Y, Woo Y (2019) Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc 33:2591–2601PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Harper K, Mattei MG, Simon D, Suzan M, Guenet JL, Haddad P, Sasportes M, Golstein P (1988) Proximity of the CTLA-1 serine esterase and Tcr alpha loci in mouse and man. Immunogenetics 28:439–444PubMedCrossRef Harper K, Mattei MG, Simon D, Suzan M, Guenet JL, Haddad P, Sasportes M, Golstein P (1988) Proximity of the CTLA-1 serine esterase and Tcr alpha loci in mouse and man. Immunogenetics 28:439–444PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Sandri A, Papagiannopoulos K, Milton R, Kefaloyannis E, Chaudhuri N, Poyser E, Spencer N, Brunelli A (2015) Major morbidity after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resections: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system. J Thorac Dis 7:1174–1180PubMedPubMedCentral Sandri A, Papagiannopoulos K, Milton R, Kefaloyannis E, Chaudhuri N, Poyser E, Spencer N, Brunelli A (2015) Major morbidity after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resections: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system. J Thorac Dis 7:1174–1180PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
go back to reference Cerfolio RJ, Bess KM, Wei B, Minnich DJ (2016) Incidence, results, and our current intraoperative technique to control major vascular injuries during minimally invasive robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 102:394–399PubMedCrossRef Cerfolio RJ, Bess KM, Wei B, Minnich DJ (2016) Incidence, results, and our current intraoperative technique to control major vascular injuries during minimally invasive robotic thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 102:394–399PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN (2016) Enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol 70:649–660PubMedCrossRef Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN (2016) Enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol 70:649–660PubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2020) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367PubMedCrossRef Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Siu KC, Oleynikov D (2020) A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 34:361–367PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum
Authors
Yuman Fong
Joseph F. Buell
Justin Collins
John Martinie
Christiane Bruns
Allan Tsung
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Ido Nachmany
Bjørn Edwin
Johann Pratschke
Evgeny Solomonov
Alfred Koenigsrainer
Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07836-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020 Go to the issue