Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Endoscopy | 2019 SAGES Oral

Resident perception of fundamental endoscopic skills exam: a single institution’s experience

Authors: Jacqueline J. Blank, Theresa B. Krausert, Lisa R. Olson, Matthew I. Goldblatt, Brian D. Lewis, Philip N. Redlich, Robert Treat, Andrew S. Kastenmeier

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Graduating general surgery residents are required to pass the FES exam for ABS certification. Trainees and surgery educators are interested in defining the most effective methods of exam preparation. Our aim is to define trainee perceptions, performance, and the most effective preparation methods regarding the FES exam.

Methods

General surgery residents from a single institution who completed the FES exam were identified. All participated in a flexible endoscopy rotation, and all had access to an endoscopy simulator. Residents were surveyed regarding preparation methods and exam difficulty. Descriptive statistics and a Kruskal–Wallis test were used.

Results

A total of 26 trainees took the FES exam with a first-time pass rate of 96.2%. Of 26 surveys administered, 21 were completed. Twenty trainees (76.9%) participated in a dedicated endoscopy curriculum. Scores were not different among those who received dedicated curricular instruction compared to those who did not (547 [IQR 539–562.5] vs. 516 [484.5–547], p = 0.1484; 535.5 [468.5–571] vs. 519 [464.75–575], p = 0.9514). Written exam difficulty was rated as 5.5 on a 10-point Likert scale, and 85.7% felt it was a fair assessment of endoscopy knowledge; skills exam difficulty was rated as 7, and 71% felt it was a fair assessment of endoscopy skills. Online FES modules, the endoscopy clinical rotation, and an exam preparation session with a faculty member were most effective for written exam preparation. The most effective skills exam preparation methods were independent simulator practice, the endoscopy clinical rotation, and a preparation session with a faculty member. The most difficult skills were loop reduction and retroflexion. Skill decay did not appear to be significant.

Conclusions

A clinical endoscopy rotation, a method for independent skills practice, and faculty-mediated exam instruction appear to be effective exam preparation methods. When these are present, trainees report minimal need for dedicated exam preparation time prior to taking the FES exam.
Literature
Metadata
Title
Resident perception of fundamental endoscopic skills exam: a single institution’s experience
Authors
Jacqueline J. Blank
Theresa B. Krausert
Lisa R. Olson
Matthew I. Goldblatt
Brian D. Lewis
Philip N. Redlich
Robert Treat
Andrew S. Kastenmeier
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07235-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2020 Go to the issue