Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2021

Open Access 01-05-2021 | Infertility

Clinical adhesion score (CLAS): development of a novel clinical score for adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery

Authors: Elisabeth Jacomine Lier, Barend A. W. van den Beukel, Larsa Gawria, Philip J. van der Wees, Leontine van den Hil, Nicole D. Bouvy, Ying Cheong, Rudy-Leon de Wilde, Harry van Goor, Martijn W. J. Stommel, Richard P. G. ten Broek, CLAS Collaboration

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adhesions are a major cause of long-term postsurgical complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery. Existing adhesion scores primarily measure morphological characteristics of adhesions that do not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical adhesion score (CLAS) measuring overall clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery.

Methods

An international Delphi study was performed to identify relevant score items for adhesion-related complications, including small bowel obstruction, female infertility, chronic abdominal or pelvic pain, and difficulties at reoperation. The CLAS includes clinical outcomes, related to morbidity of adhesions, and weight factors, to correct the outcome scores for the likelihood that symptoms are truly caused by adhesions. In a pilot study, two independent researchers retrospectively scored the CLAS in 51 patients to evaluate inter-observer reliability, by calculating the Intraclass correlation coefficient. During a feasibility assessment, we evaluated whether the CLAS completely covered different clinical scenarios of adhesion-related morbidity.

Results

Three Delphi rounds were performed. 43 experts agreed to participate, 38(88%) completed the first round, and 32 (74%) the third round. Consensus was reached on 83.4% of items. Inter-observer reliability for the CLAS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91–0.97). During feasibility assessment, six items were included. As a result, the CLAS includes 22 outcomes and 23 weight factors.

Conclusion

The CLAS represents a promising scoring system to measure and monitor the clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications. Further studies are needed to confirm its utility in clinical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P et al (2020) Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). Lancet 395:33–41CrossRef Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P et al (2020) Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). Lancet 395:33–41CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vrijland WW, Jeekel J, van Geldorp HJ et al (2003) Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility. Surg Endosc 17:1017–1022CrossRef Vrijland WW, Jeekel J, van Geldorp HJ et al (2003) Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility. Surg Endosc 17:1017–1022CrossRef
3.
go back to reference ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588CrossRef ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stommel MW, Ten Broek RP, Strik C et al (2017) Multicenter observational study of adhesion formation after open-and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 267:743–748CrossRef Stommel MW, Ten Broek RP, Strik C et al (2017) Multicenter observational study of adhesion formation after open-and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 267:743–748CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sikirica V, Bapat B, Candrilli SD et al (2011) The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US. BMC Surg 11:13CrossRef Sikirica V, Bapat B, Candrilli SD et al (2011) The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US. BMC Surg 11:13CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Manfredi R et al (2013) Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the "ignored iceberg" of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg 8:6CrossRef Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Manfredi R et al (2013) Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the "ignored iceberg" of medicine and surgery. World J Emerg Surg 8:6CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krielen P, van den Beukel BA, Stommel MWJ et al (2016) In-hospital costs of an admission for adhesive small bowel obstruction. World J Emerg Surg 11:49CrossRef Krielen P, van den Beukel BA, Stommel MWJ et al (2016) In-hospital costs of an admission for adhesive small bowel obstruction. World J Emerg Surg 11:49CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN et al (1999) Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476–1480CrossRef Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN et al (1999) Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 353:1476–1480CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al (2004) Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion-related complications. Colorectal Dis 6:506–511CrossRef Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D et al (2004) Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion-related complications. Colorectal Dis 6:506–511CrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):25–34CrossRef van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9(Suppl 2):25–34CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Schreinemacher MH, ten Broek RP, Bakkum EA et al (2010) Adhesion awareness: a national survey of surgeons. World J Surg 34:2805–2812CrossRef Schreinemacher MH, ten Broek RP, Bakkum EA et al (2010) Adhesion awareness: a national survey of surgeons. World J Surg 34:2805–2812CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Attard JA, MacLean AR (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg 50:291–300PubMedPubMedCentral Attard JA, MacLean AR (2007) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg 50:291–300PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2000) Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 180:33–36CrossRef Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I et al (2000) Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 180:33–36CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fevang BT, Fevang J, Lie SA et al (2004) Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 240:193–201CrossRef Fevang BT, Fevang J, Lie SA et al (2004) Long-term prognosis after operation for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg 240:193–201CrossRef
15.
go back to reference ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y et al (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106CrossRef ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y et al (2013) Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg 258:98–106CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van den Beukel BA, de Ree R, van Leuven S et al (2017) Surgical treatment of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain after gynaecological and general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 23:276–288PubMed van den Beukel BA, de Ree R, van Leuven S et al (2017) Surgical treatment of adhesion-related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain after gynaecological and general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 23:276–288PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sperber AD, Morris CB, Greemberg L et al (2008) Development of abdominal pain and IBS following gynecological surgery: a prospective, controlled study. Gastroenterology 134:75–84CrossRef Sperber AD, Morris CB, Greemberg L et al (2008) Development of abdominal pain and IBS following gynecological surgery: a prospective, controlled study. Gastroenterology 134:75–84CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Strik C, Beukel BVD, van Rijckevorsel D et al (2019) Risk of pain and gastrointestinal complaints at six months after elective abdominal surgery. J Pain 20:38–46CrossRef Strik C, Beukel BVD, van Rijckevorsel D et al (2019) Risk of pain and gastrointestinal complaints at six months after elective abdominal surgery. J Pain 20:38–46CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM et al (1990) [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions] Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir: 1009–1016 Zuhlke HV, Lorenz EM, Straub EM et al (1990) [Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions] Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir: 1009–1016
20.
go back to reference American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955CrossRef American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Adhesion Scoring Group (1994) Improvement of interobserver reproducibility of adhesion scoring systems. Fertil Steril 62:984–988CrossRef Adhesion Scoring Group (1994) Improvement of interobserver reproducibility of adhesion scoring systems. Fertil Steril 62:984–988CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Portney LG (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice Portney LG (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice
23.
go back to reference Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C et al (2014) Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 383:48–59CrossRef Ten Broek RPG, Stommel MWJ, Strik C et al (2014) Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 383:48–59CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bruce J, Krukowski ZH (2006) Quality of life and chronic pain four years after gastrointestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1362–1370CrossRef Bruce J, Krukowski ZH (2006) Quality of life and chronic pain four years after gastrointestinal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1362–1370CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Strik C, Stommel MWJ, Hol JC et al (2018) Quality of life, functional status and adhesiolysis during elective abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 215:104–112CrossRef Strik C, Stommel MWJ, Hol JC et al (2018) Quality of life, functional status and adhesiolysis during elective abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 215:104–112CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lundorff P, Brolmann H, Koninckx PR et al (2015) Predicting formation of adhesions after gynaecological surgery: development of a risk score. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:931–938CrossRef Lundorff P, Brolmann H, Koninckx PR et al (2015) Predicting formation of adhesions after gynaecological surgery: development of a risk score. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:931–938CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Al-Took S, Platt R, Tulandi T (1999) Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction after gynecologic operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:313–315CrossRef Al-Took S, Platt R, Tulandi T (1999) Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction after gynecologic operations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:313–315CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Barmparas G, Branco BC, Schnuriger B et al (2010) The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1619–1628CrossRef Barmparas G, Branco BC, Schnuriger B et al (2010) The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1619–1628CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S et al (2012) P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 16:382–388CrossRef Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S et al (2012) P.O.P.A. study: prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by icodextrin 4% solution after laparotomy for adhesive small bowel obstruction. A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastrointest Surg 16:382–388CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Nunoo-Mensah JW, Rosen M, Chan LS et al (2009) Prevalence of intra-abdominal surgery: what is an individual's lifetime risk? South Med J 102:25–29CrossRef Nunoo-Mensah JW, Rosen M, Chan LS et al (2009) Prevalence of intra-abdominal surgery: what is an individual's lifetime risk? South Med J 102:25–29CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C et al (2008) Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000475 Ahmad G, Duffy JM, Farquhar C et al (2008) Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000475
32.
go back to reference Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA et al (2014) Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001298 Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA et al (2014) Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001298
Metadata
Title
Clinical adhesion score (CLAS): development of a novel clinical score for adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery
Authors
Elisabeth Jacomine Lier
Barend A. W. van den Beukel
Larsa Gawria
Philip J. van der Wees
Leontine van den Hil
Nicole D. Bouvy
Ying Cheong
Rudy-Leon de Wilde
Harry van Goor
Martijn W. J. Stommel
Richard P. G. ten Broek
CLAS Collaboration
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07621-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2021 Go to the issue