Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Gastrectomy

Outcomes of endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy: analysis of risk factors for clinical failure

Authors: Takeshi Tomoda, Hironari Kato, Kazuya Miyamoto, Akihiro Matsumi, Eijiro Ueta, Yuuki Fujii, Yousuke Saragai, Tatsuhiro Yamazaki, Daisuke Uchida, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Okada

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) using short-type double-balloon enteroscope (sDBE) in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Methods

A total of 45 patients with surgically altered anatomy underwent ERCP using sDBE for the treatment of MBO between April 2011 and March 2019. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and technical success (insertion and biliary intervention success), adverse events, and risk factors for clinical failure.

Results

The scope was successfully inserted in the target site in 82.2% of patients (37/45), and among them, biliary intervention success was achieved in 86.4% (32/37). The overall technical success rate was 71.1% (32/45) and clinical success rate was 68.9% (31/45), with an adverse event rate of 11.1%. In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5, p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure. The clinical success rate was 38.5% in patients with peritoneal dissemination and 81.3% in those without peritoneal dissemination.

Conclusion

Endoscopic treatment using sDBE in patients without peritoneal dissemination provided favorable outcomes, and it can be an initial treatment for MBO in patients with surgically altered anatomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC et al (1987) Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet 2:57–62CrossRef Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC et al (1987) Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet 2:57–62CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andersen JR, Sorensen SM, Kruse A, Rokkjaer M, Matzen P (1989) Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut 30:1132–1135CrossRef Andersen JR, Sorensen SM, Kruse A, Rokkjaer M, Matzen P (1989) Randomised trial of endoscopic endoprosthesis versus operative bypass in malignant obstructive jaundice. Gut 30:1132–1135CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB (1994) Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet 344:1655–1660CrossRef Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB (1994) Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bileduct obstruction. Lancet 344:1655–1660CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liu K, Joshi V, Saxena P, Kaffes AJ (2017) Predictors of success for double balloon-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Dig. Endosc. 29:190–197CrossRef Liu K, Joshi V, Saxena P, Kaffes AJ (2017) Predictors of success for double balloon-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Dig. Endosc. 29:190–197CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shimatani M, Hatanaka H, Kogure H et al (2016) Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using a short-type double-balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 111:1750–1758CrossRef Shimatani M, Hatanaka H, Kogure H et al (2016) Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography using a short-type double-balloon endoscope in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 111:1750–1758CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lenze F, Meister T, Matern P et al (2014) Single-balloon enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreaticography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: higherfailure rate in malignant biliary obstruction -a prospective single center cohort analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 49:766–771CrossRef Lenze F, Meister T, Matern P et al (2014) Single-balloon enteroscopy assisted endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreaticography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: higherfailure rate in malignant biliary obstruction -a prospective single center cohort analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 49:766–771CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tanisaka Y, Ryozawa S, Mizuide M et al (2019) Analysis of the factors involved in procedural failure: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13414CrossRefPubMed Tanisaka Y, Ryozawa S, Mizuide M et al (2019) Analysis of the factors involved in procedural failure: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a short-type single-balloon enteroscope for patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy. Dig Endosc. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​den.​13414CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454CrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71:446–454CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y et al (2011) Prospective clinical study of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant lower biliary tract obstruction. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106:1239–1245CrossRef Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y et al (2011) Prospective clinical study of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant lower biliary tract obstruction. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106:1239–1245CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasoundguided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 61:684–703CrossRef Khan MA, Akbar A, Baron TH et al (2016) Endoscopic ultrasoundguided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 61:684–703CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z (2016) Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 83:1218–1227CrossRef Wang K, Zhu J, Xing L, Wang Y, Jin Z, Li Z (2016) Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 83:1218–1227CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moole H, Bechtold ML, Forcione D, Puli SR (2017) A metaanalysis and systematic review: success of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary stenting in patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures and a failed ERCP. Medicine 96:e5154CrossRef Moole H, Bechtold ML, Forcione D, Puli SR (2017) A metaanalysis and systematic review: success of endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary stenting in patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures and a failed ERCP. Medicine 96:e5154CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Minaga K, Kitano M (2018) Recent advances in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. Dig. Endosc. 30:38–47CrossRef Minaga K, Kitano M (2018) Recent advances in endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage. Dig. Endosc. 30:38–47CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Outcomes of endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy: analysis of risk factors for clinical failure
Authors
Takeshi Tomoda
Hironari Kato
Kazuya Miyamoto
Akihiro Matsumi
Eijiro Ueta
Yuuki Fujii
Yousuke Saragai
Tatsuhiro Yamazaki
Daisuke Uchida
Kazuyuki Matsumoto
Shigeru Horiguchi
Koichiro Tsutsumi
Hiroyuki Okada
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07385-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2021 Go to the issue