Top

Surgical Endoscopy

Published in:

01-10-2020 | Endoscopy

Clinical and economic burden of colorectal and bariatric anastomotic leaks

Authors: Sang W. Lee, David Gregory, Christina L. Cool

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2020

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leaks cause a significant clinical and economic burden on patients undergoing bariatric and colorectal surgeries. Current literature shows a wide variation in incidence of anastomotic leaks and a significant gap in associated economic metrics. This analysis utilized claims data to quantify the full episode-of-care cost burden of leaks following colorectal and bariatric surgeries.

Methods

Medicare Fee-for-Service and commercial claims data from a large U.S.-based health plan were queried for cost and utilization of members that underwent bariatric and colorectal surgical procedures between January 1, 2013 and August 31, 2015. Outcomes were collected for members with anastomotic leaks versus those without leaks during the initial hospital stay (index) and within 30 days of the procedure. These outcomes included leak frequency, payer reimbursement, and length of stay (LOS).

Results

The colorectal Medicare analysis identified 239,350 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. For patients with a leak compared to those without, index admission costs were $30,670 greater ($48,982 vs. $18,312; p < 0.0001) and the index LOS was 12 days longer (19 vs. 7 days; p < 0.0001). This finding was similar for the bariatric patients (n = 62,292) where cost was $30,885 higher ($43,918 vs. $13,033; p < 0.0001) and LOS was 15 days longer (17 vs. 2 days; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, readmissions and associated costs were also substantially higher for those with an index leak. The commercial analysis of both the bariatric and colorectal populations trended similarly to the Medicare population in regards to all outcomes measured.

Conclusion

Patients experiencing anastomotic leaks during and after bariatric and colorectal surgery have significantly higher costs and longer LOS both at the initial stay and within 30 days of the procedure. It is important that providers and hospitals understand the economic consequences of these procedures and implement technologies and techniques to prevent/reduce anastomotic leaks.

Available only for authorised users

Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA et al (2016) Risk factors of anastomotic leakage and long-term survival after colorectal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(8):e2890. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002890CrossRef

Chadi SA, Fingerhut A, Berho M et al (2016) Emerging trends in the etiology, prevention, and treatment of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. J Gastrointest Surg 20(12):2035–2051CrossRef

Phillips B (2016) Reducing gastrointestinal anastomotic leak rates: review of challenges and solutions. Open Access Surg. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S54936CrossRef

Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M et al (2013) Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 257(1):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cdCrossRefPubMed

Berger ER, Huffman KM, Fraker T et al (2018) Prevalence and risk factors for bariatric surgery readmissions: findings from 130,007 admissions in the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program. Ann Surg 267(1):122–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002079CrossRefPubMed

Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y et al (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18(6):1176–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2506-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krell RW, Girotti ME, Fritze D et al (2013) Hospital readmissions after colectomy: a population-based study. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):1070–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.403CrossRefPubMed

Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR et al (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76(7):579–585CrossRef

Haddad A, Tapazoglou N, Singh K et al (2012) Role of intraoperative esophagogastroenteroscopy in minimizing gastrojejunostomy-related morbidity: experience with 2,311 laparoscopic gastric bypasses with linear stapler anastomosis. Obes Surg 22(12):1928–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0757-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Rickles AS, Iannuzzi JC, Mironov O et al (2013) Visceral obesity and colorectal cancer: are we missing the boat with BMI? J Gastrointest Surg 17(1):133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2045-9CrossRefPubMed

11.

Bliss LA, Maguire LH, Chau Z et al (2015) Readmission after resections of the colon and rectum: predictors of a costly and common outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 58(12):1164–1173. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000433CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Branagan G, Finnis D, Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(5):1021–1026CrossRef

13.

Shogan BD, Carlisle EM, Alverdy JC et al (2013) Do we really know why colorectal anastomoses leak? J Gastrointest Surg 17(9):1698–2705CrossRef

14.

Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(5):569–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ricciardi R, Roberts PL, Marcello PW et al (2009) Anastomotic leak testing after colorectal resection: what are the data? Arch Surg 144(5):407–411. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.43CrossRefPubMed

16.

Allaix ME, Lena A, Degiuli M et al (2018) Intraoperative air leak test reduces the rate of postoperative anastomotic leak: analysis of 777 laparoscopic left-sided colon resections. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6421-8CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ivanov D, Cvijanović R, Gvozdenović L (2011) Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses. Srp Arh Celok Lek 139(5–6):333–338CrossRef

18.

Li VK, Wexner SD, Pulido N et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23(11):2459–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0416-4CrossRefPubMed

Title: Clinical and economic burden of colorectal and bariatric anastomotic leaks
Authors: Sang W. Lee
David Gregory
Christina L. Cool
Publication date: 01-10-2020
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Endoscopy
Bariatric Surgery
Bariatric Surgery
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07210-1

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Clinical and economic burden of colorectal and bariatric anastomotic leaks

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Doing more with less: our decade of experience with laparo-endoscopic single site Heller myotomy supports its application

Impact of pneumoperitoneum on intra-abdominal microcirculation blood flow: an experimental randomized controlled study of two insufflator models during transanal total mesorectal excision

Total laparoscopic versus open radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery reduces the adverse impacts of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis

Trans-duodenal ampullectomy for ampullary neoplasms: early and long-term outcomes in 36 consecutive patients