Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020

01-09-2020 | Rectal Cancer

Teaching robotic rectal cancer surgery at your workplace: does the presence of visiting surgeons in the operating room have a detrimental effect on outcomes?

Authors: Alain Valverde, Kevin Zuber, Nicolas Goasguen, Olivier Oberlin, Auriana Tetart, Julien Cahais, Jean-François Fléjou, Renato M. Lupinacci

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Surgery demonstration (SD) is considered to be a mainstay of surgical education, but controversy exists concerning the patient’s safety. Indeed, the presence of visiting surgeons is a source of distraction and may have an impact on surgeon’s performance. This study’s objective was to evaluate possible differences in outcomes between robotic sphincter-saving rectal cancer surgery (RRCS) performed during routine surgical practice versus in the presence of visiting surgeons in the operating room (OR) with direct access to the surgeon.

Methods

Retrospective case-matched studies were conducted from a prospectively collected database. 114 patients (38 with the presence of visiting surgeons) who underwent RRCS between January 2013 and September 2018 were included. Patients were matched in a 1:2 basis after propensity score analysis using five criteria: gender, body mass index, preoperative chemoradiation, type of mesorectum excision, and synchronous liver metastasis.

Results

There was no difference between the two groups with regard to mean operating time, estimated blood loss, conversion, and hospital stay. Also, overall (44% vs. 40%; P = 0.6), major morbidity (26% vs. 19%; P = 0.5), and unplanned reoperation (17% vs. 15%; P = 1.0) rates were not statistically different. No difference was noted with regard to the quality of mesorectum excision, or positive rate of circumferential and distal longitudinal resection margins. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes (17 vs. 14.5; P = 0.04) was lower in the SD group and the number of patients with < 12 harvested lymph nodes (31% vs. 16%; P = 0.09) was greater after SD although it did not reach statistical significance. No differences were observed in disease-free or overall survival.

Conclusions

The presence of visiting surgeons in the OR seems not to interfere in the quality of rectal resection and does not compromise patient’s short-term outcome and survival. However, mild differences in the extent of lymphadenectomy were observed and the surgeons performing SD may be aware of this.
Footnotes
1
The Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon is an institutional no-profit tertiary center from Paris, France.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Artibani W, Ficarra V, Challacombe BJ, Abbou C-C, Bedke J, Boscolo-Berto R, Brausi M, de la Rosette JJMCH, Deger S, Denis L, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Heesakkers JPFA, Jacqmin D, Knoll T, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Piechaud P-T, Rane A, Rassweiler J, Stenzl A, Van Moorselaar J, Van Velthoven RF, van Poppel H, Wirth M, Abrahamsson P-A, Parsons KF (2014) EAU policy on live surgery events. Eur Urol 66:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.028 CrossRefPubMed Artibani W, Ficarra V, Challacombe BJ, Abbou C-C, Bedke J, Boscolo-Berto R, Brausi M, de la Rosette JJMCH, Deger S, Denis L, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Heesakkers JPFA, Jacqmin D, Knoll T, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Piechaud P-T, Rane A, Rassweiler J, Stenzl A, Van Moorselaar J, Van Velthoven RF, van Poppel H, Wirth M, Abrahamsson P-A, Parsons KF (2014) EAU policy on live surgery events. Eur Urol 66:87–97. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2014.​01.​028 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.07.010 CrossRefPubMed Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM, Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2002) Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol 20:1729–1734. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​jco.​2002.​07.​010 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Valverde A, Goasguen N, Oberlin O, Svrcek M, Fléjou J-F, Sezeur A, Mosnier H, Houdart R, Lupinacci RM (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 31:4085–4091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7 CrossRefPubMed Valverde A, Goasguen N, Oberlin O, Svrcek M, Fléjou J-F, Sezeur A, Mosnier H, Houdart R, Lupinacci RM (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 31:4085–4091. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-017-5455-7 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B, Choi HS, Kim D-W, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim T-Y, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim D-H, Kim J-S, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0 CrossRefPubMed Jeong S-Y, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang S-B, Lim S-B, Choi HS, Kim D-W, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim T-Y, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim D-H, Kim J-S, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(14)70205-0 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​nejmoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7219 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Quirke P, West N, Rautio T, Thomassen N, Tilney H, Gudgeon M, Bianchi PP, Edlin R, Hulme C, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the rolarr randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1569–1580. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2017.​7219 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Ayliffe GA (1991) Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis 13(Suppl 10):S800–S804CrossRefPubMed Ayliffe GA (1991) Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis 13(Suppl 10):S800–S804CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Mege D, Hain E, Lakkis Z, Maggiori L, Prost à la Denise J, Panis Y (2018) Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients. Colorectal Dis 20:O143–O151. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14238 CrossRefPubMed Mege D, Hain E, Lakkis Z, Maggiori L, Prost à la Denise J, Panis Y (2018) Is trans-anal total mesorectal excision really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with a perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients. Colorectal Dis 20:O143–O151. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​codi.​14238 CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Rouanet P, Bertrand MM, Jarlier M, Mourregot A, Traore D, Taoum C, de Forges H, Colombo P-E (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for sphincter-saving surgery: results of a single-center series of 400 consecutive patients and perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 25:3572–3579. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6738-5 CrossRefPubMed Rouanet P, Bertrand MM, Jarlier M, Mourregot A, Traore D, Taoum C, de Forges H, Colombo P-E (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for sphincter-saving surgery: results of a single-center series of 400 consecutive patients and perspectives. Ann Surg Oncol 25:3572–3579. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-018-6738-5 CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Colombo P-E, Bertrand MM, Alline M, Boulay E, Mourregot A, Carrère S, Quénet F, Jarlier M, Rouanet P (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for sphincter-saving surgery: is there any difference in the transanal TME rectal approach?: a single-center series of 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1594–1600. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5048-4 CrossRefPubMed Colombo P-E, Bertrand MM, Alline M, Boulay E, Mourregot A, Carrère S, Quénet F, Jarlier M, Rouanet P (2016) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for sphincter-saving surgery: is there any difference in the transanal TME rectal approach?: a single-center series of 120 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1594–1600. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​s10434-015-5048-4 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Teaching robotic rectal cancer surgery at your workplace: does the presence of visiting surgeons in the operating room have a detrimental effect on outcomes?
Authors
Alain Valverde
Kevin Zuber
Nicolas Goasguen
Olivier Oberlin
Auriana Tetart
Julien Cahais
Jean-François Fléjou
Renato M. Lupinacci
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07164-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2020 Go to the issue