Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Cholecystectomy

Prevalence of anatomic landmarks for orientation during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies

Authors: Jennifer Schendel, Chad Ball, Elijah Dixon, Francis Sutherland

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We sought to determine the prevalence of common anatomic landmarks around the gallbladder that may be useful in orienting surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

The subhepatic anatomy of 128 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy was recorded. We searched and recorded the presence of five anatomic landmarks: the bile duct (B), the Sulcus of Rouviere (S), the left hepatic artery (A), the umbilical fissure (F), and the duodenum (E). These are the previously described B-SAFE landmarks.

Results

We found that the duodenum and umbilical fissure were present reliably in almost all patients. The position of the left hepatic artery could be reliably determined by its pulsation in 84% of patients. A portion of the bile duct could be seen in 77% and the Sulcus of Rouviere was present in 80%. Furthermore, the hepatobiliary triangle was always found superior or at the same level as the Sulcus of Rouviere.

Conclusions

We found that these five anatomic landmarks were reliably present. This suggest that using the B-SAFE landmarks may allow a surgeon to more easily orient before and during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and prevent bile duct injuries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertz M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertz M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed
2.
go back to reference Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G, Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era (1992) A standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127:400–403CrossRef Morgenstern L, Wong L, Berci G, Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era (1992) A standard for comparison. Arch Surg 127:400–403CrossRef
3.
go back to reference The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078CrossRef The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vollmer CM Jr, Caller MP (2007) Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem? Gastroenterology 133:1039–1041CrossRef Vollmer CM Jr, Caller MP (2007) Biliary injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem? Gastroenterology 133:1039–1041CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132–138CrossRef Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211:132–138CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury-surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132:826–835CrossRef Hugh TB (2002) New strategies to prevent laparoscopic bile duct injury-surgeons can learn from pilots. Surgery 132:826–835CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A (1997) Rouviere; s sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:1253–1254CrossRef Hugh TB, Kelly MD, Mekisic A (1997) Rouviere; s sulcus: a useful landmark in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:1253–1254CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162:71–76CrossRef Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162:71–76CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Diamond T, Mole DJ (2005) Anatomical orientation and cross-checking- the key to safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:663–664CrossRef Diamond T, Mole DJ (2005) Anatomical orientation and cross-checking- the key to safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 92:663–664CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sutherland F, Ball C (2015) The Heuristics and psychology of bile duct injuries. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 191–204CrossRef Sutherland F, Ball C (2015) The Heuristics and psychology of bile duct injuries. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 191–204CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Madani A, Watanabe Y, Feldman L, Vassiliou M, Barkun J, Fried GM, Aggarwal R (2015) Expert Intraoperative judgment and decision-making: defining the cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 221:931–940CrossRef Madani A, Watanabe Y, Feldman L, Vassiliou M, Barkun J, Fried GM, Aggarwal R (2015) Expert Intraoperative judgment and decision-making: defining the cognitive competencies for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 221:931–940CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Saxon JC, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ (2014) Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB 16:422–429CrossRef Saxon JC, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ (2014) Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB 16:422–429CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stewart L (2015) Perceptual errors leading to bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 165–186CrossRef Stewart L (2015) Perceptual errors leading to bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Dixon E, Vollmer CMJ, May GR (eds) Management of benign biliary stenosis and injury. Springer, New York, pp 165–186CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Singh M, Prasad N (2017) The anatomy of Rouviere’s sulcus as seen during cholecystectomy: a proposed classification. J Minim Access Surg 13:89–95CrossRef Singh M, Prasad N (2017) The anatomy of Rouviere’s sulcus as seen during cholecystectomy: a proposed classification. J Minim Access Surg 13:89–95CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Neychev V, Saldinger PF (2011) Raising the thinker: new concept for dissecting the cystic pedicle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 146:1441–1444CrossRef Neychev V, Saldinger PF (2011) Raising the thinker: new concept for dissecting the cystic pedicle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 146:1441–1444CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sutherland F, Dixon E (2017) The importance of cognitive map placement in bile duct injuries. Can J Surg 60:424–425CrossRef Sutherland F, Dixon E (2017) The importance of cognitive map placement in bile duct injuries. Can J Surg 60:424–425CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of anatomic landmarks for orientation during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies
Authors
Jennifer Schendel
Chad Ball
Elijah Dixon
Francis Sutherland
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Cholecystectomy
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07131-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2020 Go to the issue