Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease | 2019 SAGES Oral

Third-time (“redo–redo”) anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach

Authors: Nikhil Panda, David W. Rattner, Christopher R. Morse

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Approximately 3–6% of patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery require “redo” surgery for persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Further surgery for patients with two failed prior anti-reflux operations is controversial due to the morbidity of reoperation and poor outcomes. We examined our experience with surgical revision of patients with at least two failed anti-reflux operations.

Methods

Adults undergoing at least a second-time revision anti-reflux surgery between 1999 and 2017 were eligible. The primary outcomes were general and disease-specific quality-of-life (QoL) scores determined by Short-Form-36 (SF36) and GERD-Health-Related QoL (GERD-HRQL) instruments, respectively. Secondary outcomes included perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Results

Eighteen patients undergoing redo–redo surgery (13 with 2 prior operations, 5 with 3 prior operations) were followed for a median of 6 years [IQR 3, 12]. Sixteen patients (89%) underwent open revisions (14 thoracoabdominal, 2 laparotomy) and two patients had laparoscopic revisions. Indications for surgery included reflux (10 patients), regurgitation (5 patients), and dysphagia (3 patients). Intraoperative findings were mediastinal wrap herniation (9 patients), misplaced wrap (2 patients), mesh erosion (1 patient), or scarring/stricture (6 patients). Procedures performed included Collis gastroplasty + fundoplication (6 patients), redo fundoplication (5 patients), esophagogastrectomy (4 patients), and primary hiatal closure (3 patients). There were no deaths and 13/18 patients (72%) had no postoperative complications. Ten patients completed QoL surveys; 8 reported resolution of reflux, 6 reported resolution of regurgitation, while 4 remained on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Mean SF36 scores (± standard deviation) in the study cohort in the eight QoL domains were as follows: physical functioning (79.5 [± 19.9]), physical role limitations (52.5 [± 46.3]), emotional role limitations (83.3 [± 36.1]), vitality (60.0 [± 22.7]), emotional well-being (88.4 [± 8.7]), social functioning (75.2 [± 31.0]), pain (66.2 [± 30.9]), and general health (55.0 [± 39.0]).

Conclusion

An open thoracoabdominal approach in appropriately selected patients needing third-time anti-reflux surgery carries low morbidity and provides excellent results as reflected in QoL scores.

Graphic abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al Hashmi A-W, Pineton de Chambrun G, Souche R, Bertrand M, De Blasi V, Jacques E, Azagra S, Fabre JM, Borie F, Prudhomme M, Nagot N, Navarro F, Panaro F (2019) A retrospective multicenter analysis on redo-laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: conservative or conversion fundoplication? Surg Endosc 33:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6304-z CrossRefPubMed Al Hashmi A-W, Pineton de Chambrun G, Souche R, Bertrand M, De Blasi V, Jacques E, Azagra S, Fabre JM, Borie F, Prudhomme M, Nagot N, Navarro F, Panaro F (2019) A retrospective multicenter analysis on redo-laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: conservative or conversion fundoplication? Surg Endosc 33:243–251. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-018-6304-z CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB (1986) Reoperation for failed antireflux operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:511–517CrossRef Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB (1986) Reoperation for failed antireflux operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91:511–517CrossRef
10.
28.
go back to reference Shewale JB, Correa AM, Baker CM, Villafane-Ferriol N, Hofstetter WL, Jordan VS, Kehlet H, Lewis KM, Mehran RJ, Summers BL, Schaub D, Wilks SA, Swisher SG, T.U. of T.M.A.E.C.C. University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group (2015) Impact of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol on esophageal cancer patient outcomes and hospital charges. Ann Surg 261:1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000971 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shewale JB, Correa AM, Baker CM, Villafane-Ferriol N, Hofstetter WL, Jordan VS, Kehlet H, Lewis KM, Mehran RJ, Summers BL, Schaub D, Wilks SA, Swisher SG, T.U. of T.M.A.E.C.C. University of Texas MD Anderson Esophageal Cancer Collaborative Group (2015) Impact of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol on esophageal cancer patient outcomes and hospital charges. Ann Surg 261:1114–1123. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​sla.​0000000000000971​ CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Third-time (“redo–redo”) anti-reflux surgery: patient-reported outcomes after a thoracoabdominal approach
Authors
Nikhil Panda
David W. Rattner
Christopher R. Morse
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07059-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020 Go to the issue