Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019

01-05-2019

Strategies for surgical remediation of the multi-fundoplication failure patient

Authors: Michael Antiporda, Chloe Jackson, C. Daniel Smith, Mathew Thomas, Enrique F. Elli, Steven P. Bowers

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Outcomes are not well studied in patients undergoing remediation for multi-fundoplication failure, that is, two or more prior failed fundoplications. Re-operation must balance reflux control and restoration of the ability to eat with the challenge of reconstructing a distorted hiatus and GE junction. The purpose of this study is to present our experience with surgical remediation for multi-fundoplication failure.

Methods

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed of 91 patients who underwent third time or more esophagogastric operation for fundoplication failure at a single institution from 2007 to 2016. Dysphagia was present in 56% and heartburn in 51%. Median number of prior operations was 2 with range up to 6. Anatomic failure consisted of slipped wrap in 26 cases, wrap herniation in 23, hiatal stenosis in 24, hiatal mesh complication in 8, and wrap dehiscence in 10. Operative approaches generally followed an institutional algorithm and consisted of hiatal hernia repair with: re-do fundoplication in 55%, takedown of fundoplication alone in 24%, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy in 14%, and GE junction resection in 7%. Laparoscopic approach was successful in 81%.

Results

Mean duration of operations was 217 min and median length of stay was 3 days. The complication rate was 13%, with 7% undergoing unplanned early re-operation. Patients were followed for mean 11 months, and recurrent hiatal hernia was detected in 13%. Late re-operation was performed in 6% for recurrent hiatal hernia. Recurrent reflux symptomatology resolved in 93%. Dysphagia resolved in 84%. There were no significant differences in outcomes with regard to number of prior operations, operative approach, BMI, or age.

Conclusions

There is no single best approach to remediation in the multi-fundoplication failure patient. Re-do fundoplication is appropriate in over half of patients. Reoperation for multi-fundoplication failure can be performed via minimally invasive approach with excellent remediation of symptoms, low morbidity, and low recurrence rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robinson B, Dunst CM, Cassera MA, Reavis KM, Sharata A, Swanstrom LL (2015) 20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability. Surg Endosc 29(9):2520–2524CrossRefPubMed Robinson B, Dunst CM, Cassera MA, Reavis KM, Sharata A, Swanstrom LL (2015) 20 years later: laparoscopic fundoplication durability. Surg Endosc 29(9):2520–2524CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Sorasto A, Autio R, Södervik H, Mäkelä H, Hulkko A (1999) Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup. J Am Coll Surg 188(4):368–376CrossRefPubMed Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P, Sorasto A, Autio R, Södervik H, Mäkelä H, Hulkko A (1999) Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup. J Am Coll Surg 188(4):368–376CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ruiz-Tovar J, Diez-Tabernilla M, Chames A, Morales V, Martinez-Molina E (2010) Clinical outcome at 10 years after laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(1):21–23CrossRefPubMed Ruiz-Tovar J, Diez-Tabernilla M, Chames A, Morales V, Martinez-Molina E (2010) Clinical outcome at 10 years after laparoscopic versus open Nissen fundoplication. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20(1):21–23CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hinder RA, Klingler PJ, Perdikis G, Smith SL (1997) Management of the failed antireflux operation. Surg Clin North Am 77(5):1083–1098CrossRefPubMed Hinder RA, Klingler PJ, Perdikis G, Smith SL (1997) Management of the failed antireflux operation. Surg Clin North Am 77(5):1083–1098CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1539–1549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Furnée EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):1539–1549CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ (2011) A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc 25(3):706–712CrossRefPubMed Van Beek DB, Auyang ED, Soper NJ (2011) A comprehensive review of laparoscopic redo fundoplication. Surg Endosc 25(3):706–712CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB (1986) Reoperation for failed antireflux operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91(4):511–517PubMed Little AG, Ferguson MK, Skinner DB (1986) Reoperation for failed antireflux operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 91(4):511–517PubMed
9.
go back to reference Makris KI, Panwar A, Willer BL, Ali A, Sramek KL, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2012) The role of short-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed antireflux surgery: a single-center 5-year experience. Surg Endosc 26(5):1279–1286CrossRefPubMed Makris KI, Panwar A, Willer BL, Ali A, Sramek KL, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2012) The role of short-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction for failed antireflux surgery: a single-center 5-year experience. Surg Endosc 26(5):1279–1286CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mittal SK, Légner A, Tsuboi K, Juhasz A, Bathla L, Lee TH (2013) Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to redo fundoplication in a subset of patients with failed antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 27(3):927–935CrossRefPubMed Mittal SK, Légner A, Tsuboi K, Juhasz A, Bathla L, Lee TH (2013) Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to redo fundoplication in a subset of patients with failed antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 27(3):927–935CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Awais O, Luketich JD, Reddy N, Bianco V, Levy RM, Schuchert MJ, Gooding WE, Crist LR, Landreneau RJ, Pennathur A (2014) Roux-en-Y near esophagojejunostomy for failed antireflux operations: outcomes in more than 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 98(6):1905–1911. (discussion 1911–1913)CrossRefPubMed Awais O, Luketich JD, Reddy N, Bianco V, Levy RM, Schuchert MJ, Gooding WE, Crist LR, Landreneau RJ, Pennathur A (2014) Roux-en-Y near esophagojejunostomy for failed antireflux operations: outcomes in more than 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 98(6):1905–1911. (discussion 1911–1913)CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Singhal S, Kirkpatrick DR, Masuda T, Gerhardt J, Mittal SK (2018) Primary and redo antireflux surgery: outcomes and lessons learned. J Gastrointest Surg 22:177–186CrossRefPubMed Singhal S, Kirkpatrick DR, Masuda T, Gerhardt J, Mittal SK (2018) Primary and redo antireflux surgery: outcomes and lessons learned. J Gastrointest Surg 22:177–186CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Terry ML, Vernon A, Hunter JG (2004) Stapled-wedge Collis gastroplasty for the shortened esophagus. Am J Surg 188(2):195–199CrossRefPubMed Terry ML, Vernon A, Hunter JG (2004) Stapled-wedge Collis gastroplasty for the shortened esophagus. Am J Surg 188(2):195–199CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Makdisi G, Nichols F, Cassivi S, Wigle D, Shen R, Allen M, Deschamps C (2014) Laparoscopic repair for failed antireflux procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1261–1266CrossRefPubMed Makdisi G, Nichols F, Cassivi S, Wigle D, Shen R, Allen M, Deschamps C (2014) Laparoscopic repair for failed antireflux procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 98:1261–1266CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Brunt LM, Hunter JG, Demeester TR, Swanstrom LL, Smith CD, Filipi CJ (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23(6):1219–1226CrossRefPubMed Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Brunt LM, Hunter JG, Demeester TR, Swanstrom LL, Smith CD, Filipi CJ (2009) Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 23(6):1219–1226CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, Harris AS, Belli EV, Pfluke JM, Preissler S, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2010) Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 24(12):3095–3101CrossRefPubMed Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, Harris AS, Belli EV, Pfluke JM, Preissler S, Asbun HJ, Smith CD (2010) Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 24(12):3095–3101CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Polissar NL, Neradilek MB, Mitsumori LM, Rohrmann CA, Swanstrom LL (2011) Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 213(4):461–468CrossRefPubMed Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter JG, Brunt ML, Soper NJ, Sheppard BC, Polissar NL, Neradilek MB, Mitsumori LM, Rohrmann CA, Swanstrom LL (2011) Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 213(4):461–468CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Antiporda M, Veenstra B, Jackson C, Kandel P, Daniel Smith C, Bowers SP (2018) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: are there factors associated with anatomic recurrence? Surg Endosc 32(2):945–954CrossRefPubMed Antiporda M, Veenstra B, Jackson C, Kandel P, Daniel Smith C, Bowers SP (2018) Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: are there factors associated with anatomic recurrence? Surg Endosc 32(2):945–954CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Strategies for surgical remediation of the multi-fundoplication failure patient
Authors
Michael Antiporda
Chloe Jackson
C. Daniel Smith
Mathew Thomas
Enrique F. Elli
Steven P. Bowers
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6429-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019 Go to the issue