Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Gastrostomy | 2019 SAGES Oral

Gastrectomy versus stomach left in situ with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of gastroparesis

Authors: Joshua P. Landreneau, Andrew T. Strong, Kevin El-Hayek, Matthew D. Kroh, John H. Rodriguez

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gastroparesis is a debilitating functional disorder of the stomach marked by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Patients with severe, refractory symptoms may ultimately be managed with Roux-en-Y reconstruction; however, it is unclear whether the stomach should be left in situ, similar to a conventional gastric bypass, or resected as in gastrectomy.

Methods

All patients undergoing Roux-en-Y for the treatment of gastroparesis (GP) at our institution from September 2010 through March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with prior gastric resection or whose primary operative indication was not gastroparesis were excluded from analysis.

Results

Twenty-six patients underwent Roux-en-Y with stomach left in situ (RY-SIS) and twenty-seven patients underwent gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction during the study period. The mean age was 49.7 years in the RY-SIS cohort and 48.5 years in the gastrectomy cohort. Etiology of GP was similar between the two cohorts. Patients undergoing gastrectomy were more likely to have previous interventions for GP (63.0% vs. 26.9%). RY-SIS was associated with a shorter operative time (155 vs. 223 min), less blood loss (24 vs. 130 mL), and shorter length of stay (4.0 vs. 7.2 days). Twelve patients (44.4%) had complications within 30 days following gastrectomy compared to two patients (7.7%) following RY-SIS (p = 0.001). Patients in the RY-SIS cohort were more likely to require further subsequent surgical intervention for GP (23.1% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). At last follow-up, there were no differences in reported GP symptoms or symptom scoring.

Conclusions

Gastrectomy was associated with greater perioperative morbidity compared to leaving the stomach in situ. Symptomatic improvement at intermediate follow-up was equivalent following either procedure. However, patients undergoing RY-SIS were more likely to require subsequent surgical intervention, suggesting that gastrectomy may be a more definitive operation for the management of medically refractory gastroparesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hasler WL (2007) Gastroparesis: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 36:619–647CrossRef Hasler WL (2007) Gastroparesis: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 36:619–647CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Myint AS, Rieders B, Tashkandi M, Borum ML, Koh JM, Stephen S, Doman DB (2018) Current and emerging therapeutic options for gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:639–645 Myint AS, Rieders B, Tashkandi M, Borum ML, Koh JM, Stephen S, Doman DB (2018) Current and emerging therapeutic options for gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:639–645
7.
go back to reference Mancini SA, Angelo JL, Peckler Z, Philp FH, Farah KF (2015) Pyloroplasty for refractory gastroparesis. Am Surg 81:738–746PubMed Mancini SA, Angelo JL, Peckler Z, Philp FH, Farah KF (2015) Pyloroplasty for refractory gastroparesis. Am Surg 81:738–746PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wakamatsu K, Perez Quirante F, Montorfano L, Lo Menzo E, Seto Y, Rosenthal RJ (2018) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroparesis: a single center experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:200–205CrossRefPubMed Wakamatsu K, Perez Quirante F, Montorfano L, Lo Menzo E, Seto Y, Rosenthal RJ (2018) Laparoscopic treatment of gastroparesis: a single center experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14:200–205CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference McCallum RW, Polepalle SC, Schirmer B (1991) Completion gastrectomy for refractory gastroparesis following surgery for peptic ulcer disease. Long-term follow-up with subjective and objective parameters. Dig Dis Sci 36:1556–1561CrossRefPubMed McCallum RW, Polepalle SC, Schirmer B (1991) Completion gastrectomy for refractory gastroparesis following surgery for peptic ulcer disease. Long-term follow-up with subjective and objective parameters. Dig Dis Sci 36:1556–1561CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, Hasler WL, Lin HC, Maurer AH, McCallum RW, Nowak T, Nusynowitz ML, Parkman HP, Shreve P, Szarka LA, Snape WJ, Ziessman HA, American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine (2008) Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol 103:753–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01636.x CrossRefPubMed Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, Hasler WL, Lin HC, Maurer AH, McCallum RW, Nowak T, Nusynowitz ML, Parkman HP, Shreve P, Szarka LA, Snape WJ, Ziessman HA, American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine (2008) Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol 103:753–763. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1572-0241.​2007.​01636.​x CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Watkins PJ, Buxton-Thomas MS, Howard ER (2003) Long-term outcome after gastrectomy for intractable diabetic gastroparesis. Diabet Med 20:58–63CrossRefPubMed Watkins PJ, Buxton-Thomas MS, Howard ER (2003) Long-term outcome after gastrectomy for intractable diabetic gastroparesis. Diabet Med 20:58–63CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Gastrectomy versus stomach left in situ with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of gastroparesis
Authors
Joshua P. Landreneau
Andrew T. Strong
Kevin El-Hayek
Matthew D. Kroh
John H. Rodriguez
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06951-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2020 Go to the issue