Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020

Open Access 01-03-2020 | Splenectomy

Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Authors: Alma L. Moekotte, Sanne Lof, Steve A. White, Ravi Marudanayagam, Bilal Al-Sarireh, Sakhanat Rahman, Zahir Soonawalla, Mark Deakin, Somaiah Aroori, Basil Ammori, Dhanny Gomez, Gabriele Marangoni, Mohammed Abu Hilal, For the Minimally Invasive liver and Pancreatic Surgery Study Group-UK (MI-LAPS UK)

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The laparoscopic approach in distal pancreatectomy is associated with higher rates of splenic preservation compared to open surgery. Although favorable postoperative short-term outcomes have been reported in open spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy when compared to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy, it is unclear whether this observation applies to the laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study is to compare laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS).

Study design

This is a UK wide, propensity score-matched study, including patients who underwent LSPDP or LDPS between 2006 and 2016. Short-term outcomes were compared between LSPDP and LDPS according to intention to treat. Additionally, risk factors for unplanned splenectomy were explored.

Results

A total of 456 patients were included from eleven centers (229 LSPDP and 227 LDPS). We were able to match 173 LSPDP cases to 173 LDPS cases, according to intention to treat. No differences were seen in postoperative morbidity between the groups. The only identified risk factor for unplanned splenectomy was tumor size ≥ 30 mm.

Conclusions

Preserving the spleen during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is not associated with a lower postoperative morbidity compared to sacrificing the spleen. Tumor size is a risk factor for unplanned splenectomy.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, Shinkai H, Han I, Muto T (1996) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery 120:885–890CrossRef Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, Shinkai H, Han I, Muto T (1996) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgery 120:885–890CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cooperman AM (1978) Surgery of the pancreas: a text and atlas Cooperman AM (1978) Surgery of the pancreas: a text and atlas
6.
go back to reference Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR (2011) Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Lancet 378:86–97CrossRef Di Sabatino A, Carsetti R, Corazza GR (2011) Post-splenectomy and hyposplenic states. Lancet 378:86–97CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J, Esmaeilzadeh M, Garoussi C, Emami G, Kössler-Ebs J, Müller-Stich BP, Büchler MW, Hackert T, Diener MK (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surg (United States) 157:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081 CrossRef Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J, Esmaeilzadeh M, Garoussi C, Emami G, Kössler-Ebs J, Müller-Stich BP, Büchler MW, Hackert T, Diener MK (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it’s time to randomize. Surg (United States) 157:45–55. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2014.​06.​081 CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jiang C, Lv G-Y, Wang YC, Liu XY, Wang GY (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic preservation: a retrospective study of 39 cases. Indian J Surg 77:783–787CrossRef Jiang C, Lv G-Y, Wang YC, Liu XY, Wang GY (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic preservation: a retrospective study of 39 cases. Indian J Surg 77:783–787CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Choi SH, Seo MA, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2012) Is it worthwhile to preserve adult spleen in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 26:3149–3156CrossRef Choi SH, Seo MA, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2012) Is it worthwhile to preserve adult spleen in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 26:3149–3156CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hartwig W, Vollmer CM, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Neoptolemos JP, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Asbun HJ, Bassi C, Bockhorn M, Charnley R, Conlon KC, Dervenis C, Fernandez-Cruz L, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Imrie CW, Lillemoe KD, Milićević MN, Montorsi M, Shrikhande SV, Vashist YK, Izbicki JR, Büchler MW (2014) Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surg (United States) 156:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.009 CrossRef Hartwig W, Vollmer CM, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Neoptolemos JP, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Asbun HJ, Bassi C, Bockhorn M, Charnley R, Conlon KC, Dervenis C, Fernandez-Cruz L, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Imrie CW, Lillemoe KD, Milićević MN, Montorsi M, Shrikhande SV, Vashist YK, Izbicki JR, Büchler MW (2014) Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surg (United States) 156:1–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2014.​02.​009 CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mowbray N, Al-Sarira A, Al-Sarira B (2016) Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy in the United Kingdom: analysis of a six-year experience in a single tertiary center. Pancreas 45:1204–1207CrossRef Mowbray N, Al-Sarira A, Al-Sarira B (2016) Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy in the United Kingdom: analysis of a six-year experience in a single tertiary center. Pancreas 45:1204–1207CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study
Authors
Alma L. Moekotte
Sanne Lof
Steve A. White
Ravi Marudanayagam
Bilal Al-Sarireh
Sakhanat Rahman
Zahir Soonawalla
Mark Deakin
Somaiah Aroori
Basil Ammori
Dhanny Gomez
Gabriele Marangoni
Mohammed Abu Hilal
For the Minimally Invasive liver and Pancreatic Surgery Study Group-UK (MI-LAPS UK)
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06901-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2020 Go to the issue