Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

ERCP-related perforation: an analysis of operative outcomes in a large series over 12 years

Authors: Nilesh Sadashiv Patil, Nisha Solanki, Pramod Kumar Mishra, Barjesh Chander Sharma, Sundeep Singh Saluja

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perforation is a rare but serious adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of morbidity and mortality after surgical management of ERCP-related perforation (EP).

Methods

The records of patients with EP requiring surgical intervention at a tertiary referral center in a 12-year period (2004–2016) were retrospectively analyzed for demography, indications for ERCP, risk factors, timing and type of surgical repair, post-operative course, hospital stay, and outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify the parameters predicting survival.

Results

Of 25,300 ERCPs, 380 (1.5%) had EP. Non-operative management was successful in 330 (86.8%) patients. 50 (13.2%) patients were operated for EP. Out of 50, the perforation was detected during ERCP (intra-procedure) in 32 patients (64%). In 30 patients (60%), the surgery was performed within 24 h of ERCP. Twenty patients underwent delayed surgery (after 24 h of ERCP) following the failure of initial non-operative management. The delayed surgery after an unsuccessful medical treatment had a detrimental effect on morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Post-operative duodenal leak was the only independent predictor of 90-day mortality (p = 0.02, OR = 9.1, 95% CI 1.52–54.64). Addition of T-tube duodenostomy (TTD) to the primary repair for either type I or type II perforations increased post-operative duodenal leak (type I, p = 0.048 and type II; p = 0.001) and mortality (type I, p = 0.009 and type II, p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Although EP is a rare event, it has a serious impact on morbidity and mortality. Delaying of surgery following failed non-operative management worsens the prognosis. Addition of TTD to the repair is not helpful in these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stapfer M, Selby RR, Strain SC et al (2000) Management of duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 232:191–198CrossRef Stapfer M, Selby RR, Strain SC et al (2000) Management of duodenal perforations after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 232:191–198CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR et al (2006) Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 8:393–399CrossRef Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR et al (2006) Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB (Oxford) 8:393–399CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M et al (2012) Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg 55:99–104CrossRef Dubecz A, Ottmann J, Schweigert M et al (2012) Management of ERCP-related small bowel perforations: the pivotal role of physical investigation. Can J Surg 55:99–104CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim J, Lee SH, Paik WH et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforations associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 26:3293–3300CrossRef Kim J, Lee SH, Paik WH et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforations associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 26:3293–3300CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C et al (2013) Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc 27:2005–2012CrossRef Alfieri S, Rosa F, Cina C et al (2013) Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc 27:2005–2012CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH (2013) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:496–504 Szary NM, Al-Kawas FH (2013) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them. Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:496–504
7.
go back to reference Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1781–1788CrossRef Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102:1781–1788CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Machado NO (2012) Management of duodenal perforation postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 13:18–25PubMed Machado NO (2012) Management of duodenal perforation postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 13:18–25PubMed
9.
go back to reference Prachayakul V, Aswakul P (2014) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2:522–527CrossRef Prachayakul V, Aswakul P (2014) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: management and prevention. World J Clin Cases 2:522–527CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bell RC, Van Steigmann G, Goff J et al (1991) Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 57:237–240PubMed Bell RC, Van Steigmann G, Goff J et al (1991) Decision for surgical management of perforation following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am Surg 57:237–240PubMed
11.
go back to reference Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10CrossRef Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee TH, Han JH, Park SH (2013) Endoscopic treatment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc 46:522–528CrossRef Lee TH, Han JH, Park SH (2013) Endoscopic treatment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related duodenal perforations. Clin Endosc 46:522–528CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY et al (2009) Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 23:833–838CrossRef Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY et al (2009) Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 23:833–838CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic co morbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Lehman G, VennesJ et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRef Cotton PB, Lehman G, VennesJ et al (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Huang L, Yu QS, Zhang Q et al (2015) Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation. Dig Endosc 27:381–387CrossRef Huang L, Yu QS, Zhang Q et al (2015) Comparison between double-guidewire technique and transpancreatic sphincterotomy technique for difficult biliary cannulation. Dig Endosc 27:381–387CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB et al (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 101:1644–1655CrossRef Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB et al (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 101:1644–1655CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J et al (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258:1–7CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Scarlett PY, Falk GL (1994) The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 64:843–846CrossRef Scarlett PY, Falk GL (1994) The management of perforation of the duodenum following endoscopic sphincterotomy: a proposal for selective therapy. Aust N Z J Surg 64:843–846CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Dalgic T et al (2012) Surgical outcome of patients with perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:371–377CrossRef Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Dalgic T et al (2012) Surgical outcome of patients with perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:371–377CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jin YJ, Jeong S, Kim JH et al (2013) Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 45:806–812CrossRef Jin YJ, Jeong S, Kim JH et al (2013) Clinical course and proposed treatment strategy for ERCP-related duodenal perforation: a multicenter analysis. Endoscopy 45:806–812CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:1135–1141CrossRef Vezakis A, Fragulidis G, Polydorou A (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: diagnosis and management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:1135–1141CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC et al (2008) Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 196:975–981CrossRef Knudson K, Raeburn CD, McIntyre RC et al (2008) Management of duodenal and pancreaticobiliary perforations associated with periampullary endoscopic procedures. Am J Surg 196:975–981CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Snyder WH, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL et al (1980) The surgical management of duodenal trauma. Precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg 115:422–429CrossRef Snyder WH, Weigelt JA, Watkins WL et al (1980) The surgical management of duodenal trauma. Precepts based on a review of 247 cases. Arch Surg 115:422–429CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Carrillo EH, Richardson JD, Miller FB (1996) Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma 40:1037–1045CrossRef Carrillo EH, Richardson JD, Miller FB (1996) Evolution in the management of duodenal injuries. J Trauma 40:1037–1045CrossRef
27.
go back to reference DuBose JJ, Inaba K, Teixeira PG et al (2008) Pyloric exclusion in the treatment of severe duodenal injuries: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg 74:925–929PubMed DuBose JJ, Inaba K, Teixeira PG et al (2008) Pyloric exclusion in the treatment of severe duodenal injuries: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg 74:925–929PubMed
28.
go back to reference Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA et al (2007) A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma 62:829–833CrossRef Seamon MJ, Pieri PG, Fisher CA et al (2007) A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries? J Trauma 62:829–833CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Feliciano DV et al (1990) Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective. J Trauma 30:1469–1475CrossRef Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Feliciano DV et al (1990) Conservative management of duodenal trauma: a multicenter perspective. J Trauma 30:1469–1475CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ivatury RR, Gaudino J, Ascer E et al (1985) Treatment of penetrating duodenal injuries: primary repair vs. repair with decompressive enterostomy/serosal patch. J Trauma 25:337–341CrossRef Ivatury RR, Gaudino J, Ascer E et al (1985) Treatment of penetrating duodenal injuries: primary repair vs. repair with decompressive enterostomy/serosal patch. J Trauma 25:337–341CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ERCP-related perforation: an analysis of operative outcomes in a large series over 12 years
Authors
Nilesh Sadashiv Patil
Nisha Solanki
Pramod Kumar Mishra
Barjesh Chander Sharma
Sundeep Singh Saluja
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06733-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2020 Go to the issue