Top

Published in:

01-12-2019

Over-the-scope-clip applications for perforated peptic ulcer

Authors: Jing-Jing Wei, Xue-Ping Xie, Ting-Ting Lian, Zhi-Yong Yang, Yu-Feng Pan, Zhen-Lv Lin, Guang-Wei Zheng, Ze-Hao Zhuang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2019

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the effectiveness of over-the-scope-clip (OTSC)-based endoscopic closure in patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU).

Methods

One hundred six patients diagnosed with PPU were treated with either OTSC (n = 26) or conservative treatments (n = 80), respectively. The outcome assessments included technical success rate, clinical success rate, post-treatment complications after 1 month, mortality rate, time to resume oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and the administration of antibiotics.

Results

In the OTSC group, technical and clinical success was achieved in 100% of patients without any complications, including death, incomplete closure, duodenal obstruction, and gastrointestinal bleeding, with a median operation time of 10 min. All patients in the OTSC group were discharged, while the mortality rate in the control group was 13.8%. Subsequent surgeries were required in 30% of patients in the control group. The median times to resume oral feeding were 3.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0–5.25) days in the OTSC group and 7.0 (IQR 5.0–9.0) days in the control group (p < 0.001). One month post-procedure, 30% (24/80) of patients in the control group and 0 (0/26) in the OTSC group required additional operations (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the length of the hospital stay and the administration of antibiotics between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

OTSC-based endoscopic technique, with a high clinical success rate and a shorter time to resume oral feeding, was effective in achieving closure of PPU with a diameter < 15 mm.

Haito-Chavez Y, Law JK, Kratt T et al (2014) International multicenter experience with an over-the-scope clipping device for endoscopic management of GI defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 80(4):610–622CrossRef

Verlaan T, Voermans RP, van Berge Henegouwen MI et al (2015) Endoscopic closure of acute perforations of the GI tract: a systematic review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc 82(4):618–628 e5CrossRef

von Renteln D, Rudolph HU, Schmidt A et al (2010) Endoscopic closure of duodenal perforations by using an over-the-scope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study. Gastrointest Endosc 71(1):131–138CrossRef

Iabichino G, Eusebi LH, Palamara MA et al (2018) Performance of the over-the-scope clip system in the endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations and post-surgical leaks and fistulas. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 64(1):75–83PubMed

Changela K, Virk MA, Patel N et al (2014) Role of over the scope clips in the management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations. World J Gastroenterol 20(32):11460–11462CrossRef

Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS et al (2009) The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 69(4):843–849CrossRef

Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM et al (2002) Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 56(2):190–194CrossRef

Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T et al (2007) A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with the patient under conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 65(3):537–542CrossRef

Montalvo-Javé EE, Corres-Sillas O, Athié-Gutiérrez C (2011) Factors associated with postoperative complications and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer. Cir Cir 79(2):141–148PubMed

10.

Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A et al (1987) Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 205(1):22–26CrossRef

11.

Billing A, Fröhlich D, Schildberg FW (1994) Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. Br J Surg 81(2):209–213CrossRef

12.

Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A et al (2011) Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1329–1335CrossRef

13.

Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Søreide K (2014) What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems. J Gastrointest Surg 18(7):1261–1268CrossRef

14.

Muller MK, Wrann S, Widmer J et al (2016) Perforated peptic ulcer repair: factors predicting conversion in laparoscopy and postoperative septic complications. World J Surg 40(9):2186–2193CrossRef

15.

Bertleff MJ, Lange JF (2010) Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc 24(6):1231–1239CrossRef

16.

Tas I, Ulger BV, Onder A et al (2014) Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Ulus Cerrahi Derg 31(1):20–25PubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Guadagni S, Cengeli I, Galatioto C et al (2014) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: single-center results. Surg Endosc 28(8):2302–2308CrossRef

18.

von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Vassiliou MC et al (2010) Endoscopic full-thickness resection and defect closure in the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 71(7):1267–1273CrossRef

19.

Nishiyama N, Mori H, Kobara H et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clip: including complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 19(18):2752–2760CrossRef

Title: Over-the-scope-clip applications for perforated peptic ulcer
Authors: Jing-Jing Wei
Xue-Ping Xie
Ting-Ting Lian
Zhi-Yong Yang
Yu-Feng Pan
Zhen-Lv Lin
Guang-Wei Zheng
Ze-Hao Zhuang
Publication date: 01-12-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06717-x

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Over-the-scope-clip applications for perforated peptic ulcer

Abstract

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Open versus minimally invasive liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases (LapOpHuva): a prospective randomized controlled trial

Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following stent insertion for obstructing colon cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) as a prognostic immunonutritional biomarker for gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for lesions located in posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term and oncological outcomes

Early unplanned reoperations after gastrectomy for gastric cancer are different between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery

Clinical feasibility and safety of third space robotic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors dissection