Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2019

01-06-2019

Perforation in the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: a real surgical complication with a challenging prognosis?

Authors: Xavier Serra-Aracil, Anna Pallisera-Lloveras, Laura Mora-Lopez, Pere Rebasa, Sheila Serra-Pla, Salvador Navarro

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perforation in the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery represents a major challenge. It is usually treated by primary suture, though some authors propose laparoscopic repair with or without ostomy. It is unclear whether perforation increases the risk of tumor dissemination.

Aim

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of primary suture of peritoneal perforation and the long-term risk of dissemination, also, to determine risk factors for perforation and to propose a predictive model for lesions with risk of perforation.

Method

This is an observational study with prospective data collection at Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, of patients undergoing transanal surgery with perforation into the peritoneal cavity from June 2004 to September 2017. The main variable is postoperative morbidity and mortality. The long-term follow-up of local recurrence and peritoneal tumor dissemination is described, and a quantitative predictive model for peritoneal cavity perforation is proposed.

Results

Forty-five patients out of 686 (6.6%) presented perforation into the peritoneal cavity. Ten patients (22.2%) in the perforation group had morbidity, a rate similar to the non-perforated group. There was no peritoneal dissemination in patients with adenoma or with carcinoma treated with curative intent. In the quantitative predictive model, risk factors for perforation were proximal edge of tumor > 14 cm from anal verge (6 points), size ≥ 6 cm (2), age ≥ 85 years (4), anterior quadrant (3) , and sex (2). Total scores of ≥ 6 points predicted perforation.

Conclusions

Primary suture after peritoneal cavity perforation during transanal surgery is safe and does not increase the risk of recurrence or peritoneal dissemination. Our predictive model provides guidance regarding the risk of perforation and the need to suture the defect after transanal surgery resection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benson AB III, Venook AP, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS, Deming D, Engstrom PF, Enzinger PC, Fichera A, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hoffe S, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Wu CS, Gregory KM, Freedman-Cass D (2017) Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(3):370–398 Benson AB III, Venook AP, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS, Deming D, Engstrom PF, Enzinger PC, Fichera A, Grem JL, Grothey A, Hochster HS, Hoffe S, Hunt S, Kamel A, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Mulcahy MF, Murphy JD, Nurkin S, Saltz L, Sharma S, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Wu CS, Gregory KM, Freedman-Cass D (2017) Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15(3):370–398
2.
go back to reference Demartines N, Von Flüe MO, Harder FH (2001) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 25:870–875CrossRefPubMed Demartines N, Von Flüe MO, Harder FH (2001) Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg 25:870–875CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Peng J, Chen W, Sheng W, Xu Y, Cai G, Huang D, Cai S (2011) Oncological outcome of T1 rectal cancer undergoing standard resection and local excision. Colorectal Dis 13(2):e14–e19CrossRefPubMed Peng J, Chen W, Sheng W, Xu Y, Cai G, Huang D, Cai S (2011) Oncological outcome of T1 rectal cancer undergoing standard resection and local excision. Colorectal Dis 13(2):e14–e19CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1031CrossRefPubMed Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1026–1031CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Buess G, Theiss R, Günther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Leber Magen Darm 15(6):271–279PubMed Buess G, Theiss R, Günther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Leber Magen Darm 15(6):271–279PubMed
6.
go back to reference Rocha JJ, Feres O (2008) Transanal endoscopic operation: a new proposal. Acta Cir Bras 23(Suppl 1):93–104. Discussion 104CrossRefPubMed Rocha JJ, Feres O (2008) Transanal endoscopic operation: a new proposal. Acta Cir Bras 23(Suppl 1):93–104. Discussion 104CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. SurgEndosc 24:2200–2205 Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. SurgEndosc 24:2200–2205
8.
go back to reference Lev-Chelouche D, Margel D, Goldman G, Rabau MJ (2000) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience with 75 rectal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 43:662–668CrossRefPubMed Lev-Chelouche D, Margel D, Goldman G, Rabau MJ (2000) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience with 75 rectal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 43:662–668CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gavagan JA, Whiteford MH, Swanstrom LL (2004) Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications. Am J Surg 187:630–634CrossRefPubMed Gavagan JA, Whiteford MH, Swanstrom LL (2004) Full-thickness intraperitoneal excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase short-term complications. Am J Surg 187:630–634CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Baatrup G, Borschitz T, Cunningham C, Qvist N (2009) Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or conological outcomes. Surg Endosc 23:2680–2683CrossRefPubMed Baatrup G, Borschitz T, Cunningham C, Qvist N (2009) Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or conological outcomes. Surg Endosc 23:2680–2683CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M, Mathias J, Simson J (2009) The cration of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis 11(9):964–966CrossRefPubMed Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M, Mathias J, Simson J (2009) The cration of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis 11(9):964–966CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Morino M, Allaix ME, Famiglietti F, Caldart M, Arezzo A (2013) Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and log-term outcomes after transanalendosopic microsurgery? Surg Endosc 27:181–188CrossRefPubMed Morino M, Allaix ME, Famiglietti F, Caldart M, Arezzo A (2013) Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and log-term outcomes after transanalendosopic microsurgery? Surg Endosc 27:181–188CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Eyvazzadeh DJ, Lee JT, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF, Finne CO (2014) Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:438–441CrossRefPubMed Eyvazzadeh DJ, Lee JT, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF, Finne CO (2014) Outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery with intraperitoneal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:438–441CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Marks JH, Frenkel JL, Greenleaf CE et al (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 57:1176–1182CrossRefPubMed Marks JH, Frenkel JL, Greenleaf CE et al (2014) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with entrance into the peritoneal cavity: is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 57:1176–1182CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Molina G, Bordeianou L, Shellito P et al (2016) Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a Word of caution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1816–1825CrossRefPubMed Molina G, Bordeianou L, Shellito P et al (2016) Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a Word of caution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1816–1825CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Issa N, Fenig Y, Yasin M, Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Khoury W, Powsner E (2016) Laparoscopy following entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery may increase the safety and maximize the benefits of the transanal excision. Tech Coloproctol 20:221–226CrossRefPubMed Issa N, Fenig Y, Yasin M, Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Khoury W, Powsner E (2016) Laparoscopy following entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery may increase the safety and maximize the benefits of the transanal excision. Tech Coloproctol 20:221–226CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mege D, Petrucciani N, Maggiori L, Panis Y (2017) Peritoneal perforation is less a complication than an expected event during trasanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience from 194 consecutive cases. Tech Coloproctol 21(9):729–736CrossRefPubMed Mege D, Petrucciani N, Maggiori L, Panis Y (2017) Peritoneal perforation is less a complication than an expected event during trasanal endoscopic microsurgery: experience from 194 consecutive cases. Tech Coloproctol 21(9):729–736CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, Dindo D, Rega D, Delrio P (2015) Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis 17(5):397–402CrossRefPubMed Hahnloser D, Cantero R, Salgado G, Dindo D, Rega D, Delrio P (2015) Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed? Colorectal Dis 17(5):397–402CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Karimuddin AA (2017) The surgical defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed managment. Surg Endosc 31:1078–1082CrossRefPubMed Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Karimuddin AA (2017) The surgical defect after transanal endoscopic microsurgery: open versus closed managment. Surg Endosc 31:1078–1082CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Arribas D, Martinez M (2001) Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumors: should the defect be sutured? A randomizedcontrolled trial. Colorectal Dis 4:51–55CrossRef Ramirez JM, Aguilella V, Arribas D, Martinez M (2001) Transanal full-thickness excision of rectal tumors: should the defect be sutured? A randomizedcontrolled trial. Colorectal Dis 4:51–55CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ley orgánica 15/1999 de 13 de diciembre de protección de datos de carácter personal (LOPD). BOE no. 298 de 14 /12/1999 Ley orgánica 15/1999 de 13 de diciembre de protección de datos de carácter personal (LOPD). BOE no. 298 de 14 /12/1999
22.
go back to reference Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Caro-Tarrago A, Gomez-Díaz CJ, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(33):11538–11545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Caro-Tarrago A, Gomez-Díaz CJ, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Transanal endoscopic surgery in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(33):11538–11545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Corredera-Cantarin C, Gomez-Diaz C, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Atypical indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery to avoid major surgery. Tech Coloproctol 18:157–164CrossRefPubMed Serra-Aracil X, Mora-Lopez L, Alcantara-Moral M, Corredera-Cantarin C, Gomez-Diaz C, Navarro-Soto S (2014) Atypical indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery to avoid major surgery. Tech Coloproctol 18:157–164CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27:3591–3602CrossRefPubMed Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten EC, Hoff C, Dekker E, Fockens P, Bemelman WA, de Graaf EJ (2013) Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 27:3591–3602CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lee L, Burke JP, de Beche-Adams T, Nassif G, Martin-Perez B, Monson JRT, Albert MR, Atallah SB (2018) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excison of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up. Ann Surg 267(5):910–916CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Burke JP, de Beche-Adams T, Nassif G, Martin-Perez B, Monson JRT, Albert MR, Atallah SB (2018) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excison of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up. Ann Surg 267(5):910–916CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Perforation in the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: a real surgical complication with a challenging prognosis?
Authors
Xavier Serra-Aracil
Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
Laura Mora-Lopez
Pere Rebasa
Sheila Serra-Pla
Salvador Navarro
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6466-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2019 Go to the issue