Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013

01-10-2013

Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a technically demanding key technique in minimally invasive rectal surgery. We investigated the learning curve of colorectal surgeons commencing with TEM.

Methods

All TEM procedures of four colorectal surgeons were analyzed. Procedures were ranked chronologically per surgeon. Outcomes included conversion, postoperative complications, procedure time, and recurrence. Backward multivariable regression analysis identified learning curve effects and other predictors.

Results

Four surgeons resected 693 rectal lesions [69.9 % adenoma/25.5 % carcinoma; median size 20 cm2; interquartile range (IQR) 11–35; 7 ± 4 cm ab ano]. A total of 555 resections (80.1 %) were histopathologically radical (R0). Conversion (4.3 %) was influenced by a learning curve [odds ratio (OR) 0.991 per additional procedure; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.984–0.998] and by lesion size. Postoperative complications depended only on the individual surgeon and lesion size in benign lesions (10.4 % complications). A learning curve (OR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.988–0.998) and peritoneal entrance affected complications in malignant lesions (13.3 %). Procedure time [median 55 min (IQR 30–90)] was influenced by a learning curve [B −0.11 (95 % CI −0.14 to −0.09)], individual surgeon, single-piece resection, peritoneal entrance, lesion size, and rectal quadrant. Recurrence of benign lesions (4.5 %) depended on lesion size, R0 resection, and prior resection attempts. Recurrence of malignant lesions (8.9 %) depended on 3D stereoscopic view, lesion size, full-thickness resection, and length of follow-up. Recurrence-free survival of patients operated during the 36th through 80th procedure per surgeon was significantly shorter than in patients operated during procedures 1–35 and 81 onwards.

Conclusions

A surgical learning curve affected conversion rate, procedure time, and complication rate. It did not influence recurrence rates, possibly due to evolving patient populations. This first insight into the learning curve of TEM stresses the importance of quality monitoring and centralisation of care.
Literature
1.
Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H (1984) A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg 55(10):677–680PubMed
2.
Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum 51(7):1026–1030PubMedCrossRef
3.
De Graaf EJ, Burger JW, van Ijsseldijk AL, Tetteroo GW, Dawson I, Hop WC (2011) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis 13(7):762–767PubMedCrossRef
4.
Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Sharma A, Taylor A, Monson JR (2007) Cost analysis of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumours. Colorectal Dis 9(3):229–234PubMedCrossRef
5.
Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeons specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD005391
6.
Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Remzi FH, Senagore AJ, Wu JS, Strong SA, Poloneicki JD, Hull TL, Church JM (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 241(2):262–268PubMedCrossRef
7.
Pendlimari R, Holubar SD, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Pemberton JH, Cima RR (2012) Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery. Arch Surg 147(4):317–322PubMedCrossRef
8.
Li JC, Lo AW, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Leung KL (2012) Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy: a multi-dimensional analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):527–533PubMedCrossRef
9.
Koebrugge B, Bosscha K, Ernst MF (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal lesions: is there a learning curve? Dig Surg 26(5):372–377PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kipfmuller K, Buess G, Naruhn M, Junginger T (1988) Training program for transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 2(1):24–27PubMedCrossRef
11.
Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, Schmid KW, Bunte H (1996) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 39(9):969–976PubMedCrossRef
12.
Barendse RM, Doornebosch PG, Bemelman WA, Fockens P, Dekker E, De Graaf EJ (2012) Transanal employment of single access ports is feasible for rectal surgery. Ann Surg 256(6):1030–1033PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery
Publication date
01-10-2013
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2931-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2013 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon

OriginalPaper

Predictive score for anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal cancer surgery: a decision making tool for choice of protective measures

Letter to the Editor

Comment on “Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250)” (doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2359-4)

OriginalPaper

Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model

OriginalPaper

Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation

OriginalPaper

Maintenance training for laparoscopic suturing: the quest for the perfect timing and training model: a randomized trial