Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019

01-05-2019

A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors: Yunqiang Cai, Hua Luo, Yongbin Li, Pan Gao, Bing Peng

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) reconstruction is the Achilles’ heel of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). However, only a few studies have focused on the performance of this difficult procedure laparoscopically.

Methods

We present a safe and feasible technique of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy for LPD, named Bing’s anastomosis. Our study included 238 cases of LPDs that underwent Bing’s anastomosis. Data on the demographic characteristics, operative outcomes (total operative time, PJ duration, and estimated blood loss), and postoperative results (length of hospital stay, recovery of bowel function, and rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality) of the cases were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Only one patient (0.4%) in our series required conversion to open surgery as a result of uncontrolled bleeding from the superior mesenteric artery. The average operative time was 358 min (220 min to 495 min). The mean duration for PJ was 23 min (19 min to 33 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 112 ml (50 ml to 800 ml). The overall incidence of pancreatic fistula was 21.4% and included 42 cases (17.6%) of biochemical leak, eight cases (3.4%) of Grade B, and one case (0.4%) of Grade C pancreatic fistulas. The 90-day mortality was 0.4%.

Conclusions

Bing’s anastomosis is a safe, reliable, and rapid PJ technique for LPD that is associated with favorable outcomes and a low risk of pancreatic fistula. However, its safety and feasibility should be verified by performing prospective randomized controlled trials at different institutions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Specht G, Stinshoff K (2001) [Walther Kausch (1867–1928) and his significance in pancreatic surgery]. Zentralbl Chir 126:479–481CrossRefPubMed Specht G, Stinshoff K (2001) [Walther Kausch (1867–1928) and his significance in pancreatic surgery]. Zentralbl Chir 126:479–481CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M, Gumbs A, Pederzoli P (2004) Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 21:54–59CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, Mascetta G, Salvia R, Falconi M, Gumbs A, Pederzoli P (2004) Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg 21:54–59CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sun X, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Lou Y, Fu Q, Zhang X, Liang T, Bai X (2016) Meta-analysis of invagination and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an update. Int J Surg 36:240–247CrossRefPubMed Sun X, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Lou Y, Fu Q, Zhang X, Liang T, Bai X (2016) Meta-analysis of invagination and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an update. Int J Surg 36:240–247CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani G, Noce L, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Bresadola F, Intini S (2008) Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:43–47PubMed Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani G, Noce L, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Bresadola F, Intini S (2008) Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:43–47PubMed
5.
go back to reference Han HJ, Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Kim YC, Choi SY (2011) Reliability of continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:2132–2139PubMed Han HJ, Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Kim YC, Choi SY (2011) Reliability of continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:2132–2139PubMed
6.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2007) Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356–364CrossRef Grobmyer SR, Pieracci FM, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Jaques DP (2007) Defining morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: use of a prospective complication grading system. J Am Coll Surg 204:356–364CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747–739CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747; discussion 747–739CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Govindarajan A, Tan JC, Baxter NN, Coburn NG, Law CH (2008) Variations in surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 15:175–185CrossRefPubMed Govindarajan A, Tan JC, Baxter NN, Coburn NG, Law CH (2008) Variations in surgical treatment and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 15:175–185CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hines OJ, Reber HA (2006) Technique of pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg 13:185–189CrossRef Hines OJ, Reber HA (2006) Technique of pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg 13:185–189CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang H, Wu X, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi C, Wang X, Xiao G, Guo X, Wang M, Qin R (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 30:5173–5184CrossRefPubMed Zhang H, Wu X, Zhu F, Shen M, Tian R, Shi C, Wang X, Xiao G, Guo X, Wang M, Qin R (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 30:5173–5184CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nigri G, Petrucciani N, La Torre M, Magistri P, Valabrega S, Aurello P, Ramacciato G (2014) Duodenopancreatectomy: open or minimally invasive approach? Surgeon 12:227–234CrossRefPubMed Nigri G, Petrucciani N, La Torre M, Magistri P, Valabrega S, Aurello P, Ramacciato G (2014) Duodenopancreatectomy: open or minimally invasive approach? Surgeon 12:227–234CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Liao CH, Wu YT, Liu YY, Wang SY, Kang SC, Yeh CN, Yeh TS (2016) Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 40:1218–1225CrossRefPubMed Liao CH, Wu YT, Liu YY, Wang SY, Kang SC, Yeh CN, Yeh TS (2016) Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 40:1218–1225CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Clerveus M, Morandeira-Rivas A, Picazo-Yeste J, Moreno-Sanz C (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1693–1704CrossRefPubMed Clerveus M, Morandeira-Rivas A, Picazo-Yeste J, Moreno-Sanz C (2014) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1693–1704CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Que W, Fang H, Yan B, Li J, Guo W, Zhai W, Zhang S (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 209:1074–1082CrossRefPubMed Que W, Fang H, Yan B, Li J, Guo W, Zhai W, Zhang S (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Surg 209:1074–1082CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261:882–887CrossRefPubMed Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261:882–887CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hua J, He Z, Qian D, Meng H, Zhou B, Song Z (2015) Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1900–1909CrossRefPubMed Hua J, He Z, Qian D, Meng H, Zhou B, Song Z (2015) Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1900–1909CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G (2015) Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 13:84–89CrossRefPubMed Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G (2015) Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 13:84–89CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Tsuji M, Kimura H, Konishi K, Yabushita K, Maeda K, Kuroda Y (1998) Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreaticoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients. Surgery 123:617–621CrossRefPubMed Tsuji M, Kimura H, Konishi K, Yabushita K, Maeda K, Kuroda Y (1998) Management of continuous anastomosis of pancreatic duct and jejunal mucosa after pancreaticoduodenectomy: historical study of 300 patients. Surgery 123:617–621CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2017) Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 152:336–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2017) Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 152:336–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Authors
Yunqiang Cai
Hua Luo
Yongbin Li
Pan Gao
Bing Peng
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6446-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2019 Go to the issue