Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019

01-02-2019 | New Technology

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel articulating devices: a comparative study in a live porcine model

Authors: Yasuharu Okamoto, Ryu Nakadate, Shotaro Nakamura, Jumpei Arata, Susumu Oguri, Tomohiko Moriyama, Motohiro Esaki, Tsutomu Iwasa, Kenoki Ohuchida, Tomohiko Akahoshi, Tetsuo Ikeda, Takanari Kitazono, Makoto Hashizume

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and aims

Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is time-consuming and bears a high risk of perforation. The aim of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy between novel articulating devices and conventional ESD in live porcine colon models.

Methods

Thirty ESDs in ten pigs were carried out at three different locations (15, 25, and 35 cm from the anus) by the conventional method (n = 15) and by the new method (n = 15). Procedure times, adverse events (perforation, bleeding), and damage to the muscular layer were recorded, and the ESD time per unit area of the specimens was calculated.

Results

The perforation rate using the conventional method was 6.7% (1/15), whereas that using the new method was 0.0%. The number of sites of muscular damage was significantly lower in the new than conventional method (6 vs. 37, respectively; P = 0.024). The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the new than conventional method (4.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.0 ± 4.1 min/cm2, respectively; P = 0.042).

Conclusions

Use of the new ESD method allows for reduced adverse events and a shortened resection time.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1725CrossRefPubMed Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y et al (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections. Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1725CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H et al (1999) A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc 50:560–563CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H et al (1999) A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc 50:560–563CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Maple JT, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chauhan SS et al (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1311–1325CrossRefPubMed Maple JT, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chauhan SS et al (2015) Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1311–1325CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A et al (2015) Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 110:784–791CrossRefPubMed Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A et al (2015) Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 110:784–791CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T et al (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595CrossRefPubMed Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T et al (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 81:583–595CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T et al (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306CrossRefPubMed Hotta K, Oyama T, Shinohara T et al (2010) Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc 22:302–306CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Patel N, Patel K, Ashrafian H et al (2016) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes. Dig Endosc 28:405–416CrossRefPubMed Patel N, Patel K, Ashrafian H et al (2016) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes. Dig Endosc 28:405–416CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fukami N (2013) What we want for ESD is a second hand! Traction method. Gastrointest Endosc 78:274–276CrossRefPubMed Fukami N (2013) What we want for ESD is a second hand! Traction method. Gastrointest Endosc 78:274–276CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
go back to reference Ikeda K, Sumiyama K, Tajiri H et al (2011) Evaluation of a new multitasking platform for endoscopic full-thickness resection. Gastrointest Endosc 73:117–122CrossRefPubMed Ikeda K, Sumiyama K, Tajiri H et al (2011) Evaluation of a new multitasking platform for endoscopic full-thickness resection. Gastrointest Endosc 73:117–122CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH et al (2013) Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27:4130–4135CrossRefPubMed Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH et al (2013) Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27:4130–4135CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chiu PW, Phee SJ, Bhandari P et al (2015) Enhancing proficiency in performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using a prototype robotic endoscope. Endosc Int Open 03:E439–E442CrossRef Chiu PW, Phee SJ, Bhandari P et al (2015) Enhancing proficiency in performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using a prototype robotic endoscope. Endosc Int Open 03:E439–E442CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zizer E, Roppenecker D, Helmes F et al (2016) A new 3D-printed overtube system for endoscopic submucosal dissection: first results of a randomized study in a poricine model. Endoscopy 48:762–765CrossRefPubMed Zizer E, Roppenecker D, Helmes F et al (2016) A new 3D-printed overtube system for endoscopic submucosal dissection: first results of a randomized study in a poricine model. Endoscopy 48:762–765CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nakadate R, Kenmotsu H, Nakamura S et al (2014) 2.6 mm articulating endoscopic submucosal dissection device insertable into standard endoscope. Int J CARS 9(Suppl 1):S181–S182 Nakadate R, Kenmotsu H, Nakamura S et al (2014) 2.6 mm articulating endoscopic submucosal dissection device insertable into standard endoscope. Int J CARS 9(Suppl 1):S181–S182
15.
go back to reference Nakadate R, Nakamura S, Moriyama T et al (2015) Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel 2.6-mm articulating devices: an ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study. Endoscopy 47:820–824CrossRefPubMed Nakadate R, Nakamura S, Moriyama T et al (2015) Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel 2.6-mm articulating devices: an ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study. Endoscopy 47:820–824CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel articulating devices: a comparative study in a live porcine model
Authors
Yasuharu Okamoto
Ryu Nakadate
Shotaro Nakamura
Jumpei Arata
Susumu Oguri
Tomohiko Moriyama
Motohiro Esaki
Tsutomu Iwasa
Kenoki Ohuchida
Tomohiko Akahoshi
Tetsuo Ikeda
Takanari Kitazono
Makoto Hashizume
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6408-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2019 Go to the issue