Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

01-07-2018 | New Technology

Design and implementation of an electromagnetic ultrasound-based navigation technique for laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors

Authors: Iwan Paolucci, Marius Schwalbe, Gian Andrea Prevost, Anja Lachenmayer, Daniel Candinas, Stefan Weber, Pascale Tinguely

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors relies on precise tumor visualization and accurate positioning of ablation probes. This study evaluates positional accuracy and procedural efficiency of a dynamic navigation technique based on electromagnetic-tracked laparoscopic ultrasound (ELUS) for laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors.

Methods

The proposed navigation approach combines intraoperative 2D ELUS-based planning for navigated positioning of ablation probes, with immediate 3D ELUS-based validation of intrahepatic probe position. The environmental influence on electromagnetic-tracking stability was evaluated in the operation room. Accuracy of navigated ablation probe positioning assessed as the target-positioning error (TPE), and procedural efficiency defined as time efforts for target definition/navigated targeting and number of probe repositionings, were evaluated in a laparoscopic model and compared with conventional laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) guidance.

Results

The operation-room environment showed interferences < 1 mm on the EM-tracking system. A total of 60 targeting attempts were conducted by three surgeons, with ten targeting attempts using ELUS and ten using conventional LUS each. Median TPE and time for targeting using ELUS and LUS were 4.2 mm (IQR 2.9–5.3 mm) versus 6 mm (IQR 4.7–7.5 mm), and 39 s (IQR 24–47 s) versus 76 s (IQR 47–121 s), respectively (p < 0.01 each). With ELUS, median time for target definition was 48.5 s, with 0 ablation probe repositionings compared to 17 when using LUS. The navigation technique was rated with a mean score of 85.5 on a Standard Usability Scale.

Conclusions

The proposed ELUS-based navigation approach allows for accurate and efficient targeting of liver tumors in a laparoscopic model. Focusing on a dynamic and tumor-targeted navigation technique relying on intraoperative imaging, this avoids potential inaccuracies due to organ deformation and yields a user-friendly technique for efficient laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors.
Literature
5.
go back to reference van Duijnhoven FH, Jansen MC, Junggeburt JMC, van Hillegersberg R, Rijken AM, van Coevorden F, van der Sijp JR, van Gulik TM, Slooter GD, Klaase JM, Putter H, Tollenaar RAEM (2006) Factors influencing the local failure rate of radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 13:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.08.014 CrossRefPubMed van Duijnhoven FH, Jansen MC, Junggeburt JMC, van Hillegersberg R, Rijken AM, van Coevorden F, van der Sijp JR, van Gulik TM, Slooter GD, Klaase JM, Putter H, Tollenaar RAEM (2006) Factors influencing the local failure rate of radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 13:651–658. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1245/​ASO.​2006.​08.​014 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Gondan M, Nickel F, Nolden M, Fetzer A, Weitz J, Fischer L, Speidel S, Meinzer H-P, Böckler D, Büchler MW, Müller-Stich BP (2014) Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging. Surg Endosc 28:933–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3249-0 CrossRefPubMed Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Gondan M, Nickel F, Nolden M, Fetzer A, Weitz J, Fischer L, Speidel S, Meinzer H-P, Böckler D, Büchler MW, Müller-Stich BP (2014) Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging. Surg Endosc 28:933–940. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-013-3249-0 CrossRefPubMed
15.
18.
20.
go back to reference Widmann G, Stoffner R, Sieb M, Bale R (2009) Target registration and target positioning errors in computer-assisted neurosurgery: proposal for a standardized reporting of error assessment. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 5:355–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.271 CrossRef Widmann G, Stoffner R, Sieb M, Bale R (2009) Target registration and target positioning errors in computer-assisted neurosurgery: proposal for a standardized reporting of error assessment. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 5:355–365. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rcs.​271 CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4:114–123 Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4:114–123
27.
28.
go back to reference Sindram D, McKillop IH, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA (2010) Novel 3-D laparoscopic magnetic ultrasound image guidance for lesion targeting. HPB 12:709–716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sindram D, McKillop IH, Martinie JB, Iannitti DA (2010) Novel 3-D laparoscopic magnetic ultrasound image guidance for lesion targeting. HPB 12:709–716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Peterhans M, Oliveira T, Banz V, Candinas D, Weber S (2012) Computer-assisted liver surgery: clinical applications and technological trends. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:199–220 pii]CrossRefPubMed Peterhans M, Oliveira T, Banz V, Candinas D, Weber S (2012) Computer-assisted liver surgery: clinical applications and technological trends. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:199–220 pii]CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Boslo M, Calliada F, Correas JM, Darge K, Dietrich C, D’Onofrio M, Evans DH, Filice C, Greiner L, Jäger K, De Jong N, Leen E, Lencioni R, Lindsell D, Martegani A, Meairs S, Nolsøe C, Piscaglia F, Ricci P, Seidel G, Skjoldbye B, Solbiati C, Thorelius L, Tranquart F, Weskott HP, Whittingham T (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-963785 CrossRefPubMed Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Boslo M, Calliada F, Correas JM, Darge K, Dietrich C, D’Onofrio M, Evans DH, Filice C, Greiner L, Jäger K, De Jong N, Leen E, Lencioni R, Lindsell D, Martegani A, Meairs S, Nolsøe C, Piscaglia F, Ricci P, Seidel G, Skjoldbye B, Solbiati C, Thorelius L, Tranquart F, Weskott HP, Whittingham T (2008) Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med 29:28–44. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-2007-963785 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Design and implementation of an electromagnetic ultrasound-based navigation technique for laparoscopic ablation of liver tumors
Authors
Iwan Paolucci
Marius Schwalbe
Gian Andrea Prevost
Anja Lachenmayer
Daniel Candinas
Stefan Weber
Pascale Tinguely
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6088-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Go to the issue