Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018

The development and validation of a scoring tool to predict the operative duration of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Reshma Bharamgoudar, Aniket Sonsale, James Hodson, Ewen Griffiths, on behalf of the CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ability to accurately predict operative duration has the potential to optimise theatre efficiency and utilisation, thus reducing costs and increasing staff and patient satisfaction. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide, a tool to predict operative duration could be extremely beneficial to healthcare organisations.

Methods

Data collected from the CholeS study on patients undergoing cholecystectomy in UK and Irish hospitals between 04/2014 and 05/2014 were used to study operative duration. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was produced in order to identify significant independent predictors of long (> 90 min) operations. The resulting model was converted to a risk score, which was subsequently validated on second cohort of patients using ROC curves.

Results

After exclusions, data were available for 7227 patients in the derivation (CholeS) cohort. The median operative duration was 60 min (interquartile range 45–85), with 17.7% of operations lasting longer than 90 min. Ten factors were found to be significant independent predictors of operative durations > 90 min, including ASA, age, previous surgical admissions, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness and CBD diameter. A risk score was then produced from these factors, and applied to a cohort of 2405 patients from a tertiary centre for external validation. This returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.708 (SE = 0.013, p < 0.001), with the proportions of operations lasting > 90 min increasing more than eightfold from 5.1 to 41.8% in the extremes of the score.

Conclusion

The scoring tool produced in this study was found to be significantly predictive of long operative durations on validation in an external cohort. As such, the tool may have the potential to enable organisations to better organise theatre lists and deliver greater efficiencies in care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference NHS Digital (2017) Hospital admitted patient care activity, pp 2015–2016 NHS Digital (2017) Hospital admitted patient care activity, pp 2015–2016
2.
go back to reference Subhas G, Gupta A, Bhullar J, Dubay L, Ferguson L, Goriel Y, Jacobs MJ, Kolachalam RB, Silapaswan S, Mittal VK (2011) Prolonged (longer than 3 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reasons and results. Am Surg 77:981–984CrossRef Subhas G, Gupta A, Bhullar J, Dubay L, Ferguson L, Goriel Y, Jacobs MJ, Kolachalam RB, Silapaswan S, Mittal VK (2011) Prolonged (longer than 3 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reasons and results. Am Surg 77:981–984CrossRef
3.
go back to reference NHS (2009) Improving quality and efficiency in the operating theatre. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, London NHS (2009) Improving quality and efficiency in the operating theatre. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, London
4.
go back to reference Carter P (2016) Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals: Unwarranted variations. Department of Health, London Carter P (2016) Operational productivity and performance in English NHS acute hospitals: Unwarranted variations. Department of Health, London
5.
go back to reference Kumar R, Gandhi R (2012) Reasons for cancellation of operation on the day of intended surgery in a multidisciplinary 500 bedded hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 28:66–69CrossRef Kumar R, Gandhi R (2012) Reasons for cancellation of operation on the day of intended surgery in a multidisciplinary 500 bedded hospital. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 28:66–69CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dexter F, Macario A, Epstein RH, Ledolter J (2005) Validity and usefulness of a method to monitor surgical services’ average bias in scheduled case durations. Can J Anaesth 52:935–939CrossRef Dexter F, Macario A, Epstein RH, Ledolter J (2005) Validity and usefulness of a method to monitor surgical services’ average bias in scheduled case durations. Can J Anaesth 52:935–939CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dexter F, Dexter EU, Masursky D, Nussmeier NA (2008) Systematic review of general thoracic surgery articles to identify predictors of operating room case durations. Anesth Analg 106:1232–1241 (table of contents)CrossRef Dexter F, Dexter EU, Masursky D, Nussmeier NA (2008) Systematic review of general thoracic surgery articles to identify predictors of operating room case durations. Anesth Analg 106:1232–1241 (table of contents)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eijkemans MJ, van Houdenhoven M, Nguyen T, Boersma E, Steyerberg EW, Kazemier G (2010) Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon’s estimate. Anesthesiology 112:41–49CrossRef Eijkemans MJ, van Houdenhoven M, Nguyen T, Boersma E, Steyerberg EW, Kazemier G (2010) Predicting the unpredictable: a new prediction model for operating room times using individual characteristics and the surgeon’s estimate. Anesthesiology 112:41–49CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gambadauro P, Campo V, Campo S (2015) How predictable is the operative time of laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma? Minim Invasive Surg 2015:702631 Gambadauro P, Campo V, Campo S (2015) How predictable is the operative time of laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma? Minim Invasive Surg 2015:702631
10.
go back to reference Hosseini N, Hallbeck MS, Jankowski CJ, Huddleston JM, Kanwar A, Pasupathy KS (2014) Effect of obesity and clinical factors on pre-incision time: study of operating room workflow. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2014:691–699 Hosseini N, Hallbeck MS, Jankowski CJ, Huddleston JM, Kanwar A, Pasupathy KS (2014) Effect of obesity and clinical factors on pre-incision time: study of operating room workflow. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2014:691–699
11.
go back to reference Walter SD (1973) A comparison of appointment schedules in a hospital radiology department. Br J Prev Soc Med 27:160–167 Walter SD (1973) A comparison of appointment schedules in a hospital radiology department. Br J Prev Soc Med 27:160–167
12.
go back to reference Thiels CA, Yu D, Abdelrahman AM, Habermann EB, Hallbeck S, Pasupathy KS, Bingener J (2017) The use of patient factors to improve the prediction of operative duration using laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 31:333–340CrossRef Thiels CA, Yu D, Abdelrahman AM, Habermann EB, Hallbeck S, Pasupathy KS, Bingener J (2017) The use of patient factors to improve the prediction of operative duration using laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 31:333–340CrossRef
13.
go back to reference CholeS Study Group WMRC (2016) Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 103:1704–1715CrossRef CholeS Study Group WMRC (2016) Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 103:1704–1715CrossRef
14.
go back to reference CholeS Study Group WMRC (2016) Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 103:1716–1726CrossRef CholeS Study Group WMRC (2016) Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 103:1716–1726CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vohra RS, Spreadborough P, Johnstone M, Marriott P, Bhangu A, Alderson D, Morton DG, Griffiths EA, West Midlands Research Collaborative (2015) Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (The CholeS study). BMJ Open 5:e006399CrossRef Vohra RS, Spreadborough P, Johnstone M, Marriott P, Bhangu A, Alderson D, Morton DG, Griffiths EA, West Midlands Research Collaborative (2015) Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (The CholeS study). BMJ Open 5:e006399CrossRef
16.
go back to reference University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (2017) About us. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (2017) About us. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham
17.
go back to reference American Society of Anaesthesiologists (2017) ASA physical status classification system. American Society of Anaesthesiologists, Schaumburg American Society of Anaesthesiologists (2017) ASA physical status classification system. American Society of Anaesthesiologists, Schaumburg
18.
go back to reference Archer T, Macario A (2006) The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:171–176CrossRef Archer T, Macario A (2006) The drive for operating room efficiency will increase quality of patient care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 19:171–176CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Health.org.uk (2017) 6 in 10 NHS trusts in deficit Health.org Health.org.uk (2017) 6 in 10 NHS trusts in deficit Health.org
20.
go back to reference Zdichavsky M, Bashin YA, Blumenstock G, Zieker D, Meile T, Konigsrainer A (2012) Impact of risk factors for prolonged operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1033–1038CrossRef Zdichavsky M, Bashin YA, Blumenstock G, Zieker D, Meile T, Konigsrainer A (2012) Impact of risk factors for prolonged operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1033–1038CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Souadka A, Naya MS, Serji B, El Malki HO, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, Belkouchi A, Benkabbou A (2017) Impact of seniority on operative time and short-term outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience of an academic Surgical Department in a developing country. J Minim Access Surg 13:131–134CrossRef Souadka A, Naya MS, Serji B, El Malki HO, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, Belkouchi A, Benkabbou A (2017) Impact of seniority on operative time and short-term outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience of an academic Surgical Department in a developing country. J Minim Access Surg 13:131–134CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Goh YL, Toumi Z, Mok KW, Date RS (2015) Variation in conversion rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in different set-ups can be explained on the basis of C-reactive protein (CRP) values at index admission. Int J Surg 15:38–39CrossRef Goh YL, Toumi Z, Mok KW, Date RS (2015) Variation in conversion rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in different set-ups can be explained on the basis of C-reactive protein (CRP) values at index admission. Int J Surg 15:38–39CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sankar A, Johnson SR, Beattie WS, Tait G, Wijeysundera DN (2014) Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 113:424–432CrossRef Sankar A, Johnson SR, Beattie WS, Tait G, Wijeysundera DN (2014) Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 113:424–432CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The development and validation of a scoring tool to predict the operative duration of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Reshma Bharamgoudar
Aniket Sonsale
James Hodson
Ewen Griffiths
on behalf of the CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6030-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Go to the issue