Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017

01-12-2017

Gangrenous cholecystitis: innovative laparoscopic techniques to facilitate subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy when a critical view of safety cannot be achieved

Authors: Rebekah Kirkwood, Lauren Damon, Jennifer Wang, Esther Hong, Kimberly Kirkwood

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gangrenous cholecystitis is associated with a higher conversion rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open than acute non-gangrenous cholecystitis. New strategies and techniques are needed to decrease conversion rates and improve outcomes.

Methods

In this article, we provide a richly detailed, illustrated description of a modified fundus-first technique that we have developed over the last 15 years and now use routinely with rare conversions. We also compared outcomes of laparoscopic (LC) and open (OC) approaches for pathologically confirmed gangrenous cholecystitis in 146 patients during 1995–2005, the first 10 years during which these two approaches were performed contemporaneously at our institution on comparable patients.

Results

Among the 142 patients that met the inclusion criteria, laparoscopic procedures were started in 112 (79%) of these patients, with successful completion in 72 resulting in an overall conversion rate of 36%. During the last 5 years, however, in cases where the described laparoscopic technique was used, no patient has required conversion. The laparoscopic LC group had shorter average ICU stay (p < 0.05) and overall length of stay (2 vs 6 days, p < 0.001). Intraoperative cholangiography was completed in 37 of 72 LC patients (52%) versus 6 of 30 OC (20%). In five of the LC patients, a filling defect was seen on the cholangiogram and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct stones, thereby avoiding a second anesthetic and endoscopic procedure.

Conclusions

In the setting of severe inflammation, a number of procedural modifications can be incorporated to allow the surgeon to approach dissection of the gangrenous gallbladder using a flexible operative plan designed to optimize safe completion of this challenging procedure, with the expected improvement in surgical outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Karakavli FY, Akdur A, Kirnap M, Harman A, Ekici Y, Moray G (2014) Emergency cholecystectomy vs percutaneous cholecystostomy, plus delayed cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dic Int 13(3):316–322CrossRef Karakavli FY, Akdur A, Kirnap M, Harman A, Ekici Y, Moray G (2014) Emergency cholecystectomy vs percutaneous cholecystostomy, plus delayed cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dic Int 13(3):316–322CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy—“fenestrating” vs “reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Pucci MJ, Brunt LM, Deziel DJ (2016) Subtotal cholecystectomy—“fenestrating” vs “reconstituting” subtypes and the prevention of bile duct injury: definition of the optimal procedure in difficult operative conditions. J Am Coll Surg 222(1):89–96CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT, Dawes LG, Prystowsky JB, Rege RV, Joehl RJ (2002) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 106(1):20–24CrossRefPubMed Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT, Dawes LG, Prystowsky JB, Rege RV, Joehl RJ (2002) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 106(1):20–24CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Bingener J, Richards M, Schwesinger W, Dorman J, Sirinek K (2005) Gangrenous cholecystitis in the decade before and after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jsls 9(2):169–173PubMedPubMedCentral Stefanidis D, Bingener J, Richards M, Schwesinger W, Dorman J, Sirinek K (2005) Gangrenous cholecystitis in the decade before and after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jsls 9(2):169–173PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201(4):604–611CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM (2005) Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201(4):604–611CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M, Vashistha A (2000) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a review of 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. doi:10.1089/lap.2000.10.31 Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M, Vashistha A (2000) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a review of 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. doi:10.​1089/​lap.​2000.​10.​31
12.
go back to reference Soleimani M, Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, Kashfi A, Büchler MW, Schmidt J (2007) Partial cholecystectomy as a safe and viable option in the emergency treatment of complex acute cholecystitis: a case series and review of the literature. Am Surg 73(5):498–507PubMed Soleimani M, Mehrabi A, Mood ZA, Fonouni H, Kashfi A, Büchler MW, Schmidt J (2007) Partial cholecystectomy as a safe and viable option in the emergency treatment of complex acute cholecystitis: a case series and review of the literature. Am Surg 73(5):498–507PubMed
13.
Metadata
Title
Gangrenous cholecystitis: innovative laparoscopic techniques to facilitate subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy when a critical view of safety cannot be achieved
Authors
Rebekah Kirkwood
Lauren Damon
Jennifer Wang
Esther Hong
Kimberly Kirkwood
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5599-5

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017 Go to the issue